- Joined
- Dec 4, 2000
- Posts
- 60,846
- Reaction score
- 165,864
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
All the better because well lolnorf is 0-4 and Thomas cost them the game twice in 25 seconds.Brilliant win
lols
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

All the better because well lolnorf is 0-4 and Thomas cost them the game twice in 25 seconds.Brilliant win
Is Long a future mid fielder or stay at home forward type?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Mid benderMust have been off it for three days then, normally looks like he's been on a six dayer.
I don't even know why they introduced it. What was the issue with 3rd man up last year? If anything it would've helped clear congestion and if a team wants to go 3rd man up so be it, it'll leave one less player around the ball.
It became an absolute farce today when Bont signalled he was going up and North got penalised for it.
Doesn't the AFL realise that if they introduce a new rule or new interpretation the coaches will find ways to exploit it? They'll use whatever advantage they can, especially in such an even competition. Just reeks of a 'if it ain't broke don't fix it' scenario. AFL wants ruckman to have more of a say in the result of a game - maybe those days are over. Let the game evolve naturally.
Simpkin > Ziebell already. What a sniping potato headed **** that Ziebell campaigner is. Lays a big bump on someone once he can't affect the kick/contest because he's a ******* plodder that didn't reach the man on time, just about every week too. Did it to Roo twice. He's on that very short list along with Good Bloke Hodgey for "brave" players in the league who I wouldn't feel bad about seeing get cleaned up majorly in play.
Was introduced to protect the ruckman which IMO was well overdue. The ruckmen had become nothing more than stepladders and it couldn't have been enjoyable positioning yourself under the ball only to have the third man up drive his knees into your kidneys at every stoppage.I don't even know why they introduced it. What was the issue with 3rd man up last year? If anything it would've helped clear congestion and if a team wants to go 3rd man up so be it, it'll leave one less player around the ball.
It became an absolute farce today when Bont signalled he was going up and North got penalised for it.
Doesn't the AFL realise that if they introduce a new rule or new interpretation the coaches will find ways to exploit it? They'll use whatever advantage they can, especially in such an even competition. Just reeks of a 'if it ain't broke don't fix it' scenario. AFL wants ruckman to have more of a say in the result of a game - maybe those days are over. Let the game evolve naturally.
Apparently, 12 players from Adelaide have hamstring soreness and are getting treatment after every session.
No doubt dewah07 is at the game, probably ducked down to the men's room for some time with himself after that Balic goalDewah's boy Baltic puts Freo-way-to-go in front half way through the 3rd, after Dees got out to a 27 point lead before half time.
their will no doubt be a PM form me post game to himNo doubt dewah07 is at the game, probably ducked down to the men's room for some time with himself after that Balic goal


Dewah's boy Baltic puts Freo-way-to-go in front half way through the 3rd, after Dees got out to a 27 point lead before half time.
), Sydney are done, Dreamons might lose, Doggies are upset they didnt win by more.
Amazing that Angus Brayshaw would get dropped just two weeks after his terrific game against us in R1. Didn't even make Melbourne's squad of 25 for this week!