smokingjacket
Premiership Player
- Mar 30, 2014
- 3,543
- 3,660
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
White people listen to K-Pop now. It worked. Jordan Peterson is the Gangnam Style of Jungian psychoanalysis.Yeah but Gangnam Style has 3 billion.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
White people listen to K-Pop now. It worked. Jordan Peterson is the Gangnam Style of Jungian psychoanalysis.Yeah but Gangnam Style has 3 billion.
I thought that trend was already under way before PSY blew up.White people listen to K-Pop now.
Probably not the person to ask but I've always been aware of people very into Japanese culture on the internet but K-Pop specifically really seemed to take off beyond diaspora communities after PSY. SBS put PopAsia on in 2011, PSY ~2012. It happened fairly quickly.I thought that trend was already under way before PSY blew up.
Thirst for pliant oriental girls.Probably not the person to ask but I've always been aware of people very into Japanese culture on the internet for a while but K-Pop specifically really seemed to take off beyond diaspora communities after PSY. SBS put PopAsia on in 2011, PSY ~2012. It happened fairly quickly.
What were fringe gender narratives of only 10 years ago are now mainstream. There are already proposals to teach indigenous languages in primary schools. Nice, but how about we use our limited public resources to teach maths and English a bit better than what we're already doing.
Is there a Jordan Peterson lecture on the Jungian underpinnings of thirst and Anime and/or K-Pop?Thirst for pliant oriental girls.
He is somewhat socially conservative, and his political gripe is with the extreme left. More left wing people should call out those nutjubs. Everyone hates the far right - there really isn't the need to explain what they are doing or the insidious nature that characterises it because we already know.
Huge burn here from Jonathon Green:
I don't know how Peterson will recover from it.
And in all honesty, I rated Green higher than this. I expect it from the extreme left, but when the moderate left is going down this path then we have a problem.
Huge burn here from Jonathon Green:
I don't know how Peterson will recover from it.
And in all honesty, I rated Green higher than this. I expect it from the extreme left, but when the moderate left is going down this path then we have a problem.
Says the straight, white, affluent guy."Says the straight, white, affluent guy," says the straight, white, affluent guy.
Says the straight, white,affiluentguy.
243 retweets, 1161 likes. High fives all round in the echo chamber.
In all fairness, he's copped a lot as well. It's not quite in the ballpark of being ratioed, but the vast majority of replies are well and truly in the camp of "how about you actually rebut what he's saying instead of playing the race card".
There's a whole industry of just just retweeting other people's ideas with a provocative tag line.
Dr Jordan Peterson, Controversial Canadian Psychologist and Author
Terri Butler, Shadow Minister for Employment Services
Catherine McGregor, Freelance writer, broadcaster and author
Van Badham, Writer and commentator
So the panel for next Monday night's QandA is:
https://www.abc.net.au/qanda/
Don't know a lot about them, I think McGregor speaks well and it will be interesting if the discussion guess down the transgender path.
Badham had been ok on The Drum, but will definitely have some clashes there on identity politics.
What are people's thoughts? I'm not so much interested in the panelist beliefs as much as will there be any chance of a decent discussion?
(INB4 it's QandA of course it will be s**t)
It's not a throwaway line, it's a simplest and clearest way to describe him. He holds political and philosophical opinions that are deranged, divorced from fact, requiring the construction of an alternative reality within his mind to explain ie. a crackpot.3264 posts in and we’re yet to see any criticism of Peterson that is not a throw away line.
i.e Crack Pot, Pseudo Intellectual, Internet Guru
Of course it will be s**t. Three far left women against a man opposed to the far left. The questions will be geared around fringe subjects such as lobsters and climate change. Tony Jones will interrupt any time Peterson tries to explain himself properly.
It could have been a decent show if Peterson was the only guest.
It's not a throwaway line, it's a simplest and clearest way to describe him. He holds political and philosophical opinions that are deranged, divorced from fact, requiring the construction of an alternative reality within his mind to explain ie. a crackpot.
You appear to have some real issues to work thruIt's not a throwaway line, it's a simplest and clearest way to describe him. He holds political and philosophical opinions that are deranged, divorced from fact, requiring the construction of an alternative reality within his mind to explain ie. a crackpot.
White people listen to K-Pop now. It worked. Jordan Peterson is the Gangnam Style of Jungian psychoanalysis.
I assume smokingjacket may be referring to Jungian archetypes for example? Must admit I don't understand it much but from what I read in his book it does seem to lean more on the side of fantasy than child hard fact.