Past #22: Todd Goldstein - has advised NMFC he will seek opportunity at Essendon in '24 - 316 NM games/156 goals/'15 SBM/'15 AA/most hitouts in lge history

Remove this Banner Ad

Falkroo said:
Probably the best performance by any ruckman in any game this year, and yet there's still some on here that won't see it that way, calls of wanting that every week! Really!!!! Grundy is probably the only ruckman in the comp that could bring that every week and another suggesting that though he had 57 hitouts, "some didn't go to our advantage", Really!!!! feck there's some tosspots on here
Click to expand...
Who, me? If so, i hope your judgment isn't relied upon by others. Like, ever.
Hitouts north = a million, westerns = ten
Clearances = woops where'd our tap dominance go?

He must be part of the problem. PART.

Phew got that out without insulting the dickhead
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Check out what this bitter clown had to say about Goldy on The Mongrel Punt. In his view (that of a beaten Dog's fan) English had more influence on the game than Goldy and he basically writes Goldy off as not being good enough. He also thought Caleb Daniel was the best player on the ground so is clearly a certified muppet.

"Two other major contributors to today’s win, I’m not sure where you put them. Todd Goldstein had 57 out of a possible 82 hitouts today. Ruckmen must be licking their lips when they see Tim English on the weekend ahead, as his opponents continue to rack up huge hitout numbers. Nonetheless, I’ll make the contentious call that they had SFA impact on the result today – certainly in comparison to Brodie Grundy’s 60+ the night before against a far better opponent in Callum Sinclair, and arguably less than the two goals kicked by English to begin proceedings in the final stanza, also giving the Dogs the lead temporarily.
English, despite ending up with less hitouts than his back up in Zayne Cordy, still managed to account for nine score involvements to Goldstein’s five. Goldstein failed to register a single contested mark, any mark inside 50, a centre clearance (Grundy had four in a midfield stacked with centre clearance specialists) and just the one one-percenter for the day.
Indirectly, I don’t think any single player has had as much influence on the fortunes of the NMFC and Brad Scott’s support within the club than his singlemindedness towards Todd Goldstein over the years. You only have to look at the refusal to play Braydon Preuss or Daniel Currie when form has supported the inclusion or Goldstein’s demotion to see that. The gap between the standard bearer of ruckmen in the game (Grundy or Gawn, take your pick) and what Todd Goldstein is capable of delivering hasn’t been this big a gap for nearly a decade. Whoever replaces Scott at the helm has a big call to make."
 
7577969919 said:
Check out what this bitter clown had to say about Goldy on The Mongrel Punt. In his view (that of a beaten Dog's fan) English had more influence on the game than Goldy and he basically writes Goldy off as not being good enough. He also thought Caleb Daniel was the best player on the ground so is clearly a certified muppet.

"Two other major contributors to today’s win, I’m not sure where you put them. Todd Goldstein had 57 out of a possible 82 hitouts today. Ruckmen must be licking their lips when they see Tim English on the weekend ahead, as his opponents continue to rack up huge hitout numbers. Nonetheless, I’ll make the contentious call that they had SFA impact on the result today – certainly in comparison to Brodie Grundy’s 60+ the night before against a far better opponent in Callum Sinclair, and arguably less than the two goals kicked by English to begin proceedings in the final stanza, also giving the Dogs the lead temporarily.
English, despite ending up with less hitouts than his back up in Zayne Cordy, still managed to account for nine score involvements to Goldstein’s five. Goldstein failed to register a single contested mark, any mark inside 50, a centre clearance (Grundy had four in a midfield stacked with centre clearance specialists) and just the one one-percenter for the day.
Indirectly, I don’t think any single player has had as much influence on the fortunes of the NMFC and Brad Scott’s support within the club than his singlemindedness towards Todd Goldstein over the years. You only have to look at the refusal to play Braydon Preuss or Daniel Currie when form has supported the inclusion or Goldstein’s demotion to see that. The gap between the standard bearer of ruckmen in the game (Grundy or Gawn, take your pick) and what Todd Goldstein is capable of delivering hasn’t been this big a gap for nearly a decade. Whoever replaces Scott at the helm has a big call to make."
Click to expand...

Oh wow that is some reading. Picking and choosing stats to fit your point is always entertaining.
 
7577969919 said:
Check out what this bitter clown had to say about Goldy on The Mongrel Punt. In his view (that of a beaten Dog's fan) English had more influence on the game than Goldy and he basically writes Goldy off as not being good enough. He also thought Caleb Daniel was the best player on the ground so is clearly a certified muppet.

"Two other major contributors to today’s win, I’m not sure where you put them. Todd Goldstein had 57 out of a possible 82 hitouts today. Ruckmen must be licking their lips when they see Tim English on the weekend ahead, as his opponents continue to rack up huge hitout numbers. Nonetheless, I’ll make the contentious call that they had SFA impact on the result today – certainly in comparison to Brodie Grundy’s 60+ the night before against a far better opponent in Callum Sinclair, and arguably less than the two goals kicked by English to begin proceedings in the final stanza, also giving the Dogs the lead temporarily.
English, despite ending up with less hitouts than his back up in Zayne Cordy, still managed to account for nine score involvements to Goldstein’s five. Goldstein failed to register a single contested mark, any mark inside 50, a centre clearance (Grundy had four in a midfield stacked with centre clearance specialists) and just the one one-percenter for the day.
Indirectly, I don’t think any single player has had as much influence on the fortunes of the NMFC and Brad Scott’s support within the club than his singlemindedness towards Todd Goldstein over the years. You only have to look at the refusal to play Braydon Preuss or Daniel Currie when form has supported the inclusion or Goldstein’s demotion to see that. The gap between the standard bearer of ruckmen in the game (Grundy or Gawn, take your pick) and what Todd Goldstein is capable of delivering hasn’t been this big a gap for nearly a decade. Whoever replaces Scott at the helm has a big call to make."
Click to expand...

What’s The Mongrel Punt?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

7577969919 said:
Check out what this bitter clown had to say about Goldy on The Mongrel Punt. In his view (that of a beaten Dog's fan) English had more influence on the game than Goldy and he basically writes Goldy off as not being good enough. He also thought Caleb Daniel was the best player on the ground so is clearly a certified muppet.

"Two other major contributors to today’s win, I’m not sure where you put them. Todd Goldstein had 57 out of a possible 82 hitouts today. Ruckmen must be licking their lips when they see Tim English on the weekend ahead, as his opponents continue to rack up huge hitout numbers. Nonetheless, I’ll make the contentious call that they had SFA impact on the result today – certainly in comparison to Brodie Grundy’s 60+ the night before against a far better opponent in Callum Sinclair, and arguably less than the two goals kicked by English to begin proceedings in the final stanza, also giving the Dogs the lead temporarily.
English, despite ending up with less hitouts than his back up in Zayne Cordy, still managed to account for nine score involvements to Goldstein’s five. Goldstein failed to register a single contested mark, any mark inside 50, a centre clearance (Grundy had four in a midfield stacked with centre clearance specialists) and just the one one-percenter for the day.
Indirectly, I don’t think any single player has had as much influence on the fortunes of the NMFC and Brad Scott’s support within the club than his singlemindedness towards Todd Goldstein over the years. You only have to look at the refusal to play Braydon Preuss or Daniel Currie when form has supported the inclusion or Goldstein’s demotion to see that. The gap between the standard bearer of ruckmen in the game (Grundy or Gawn, take your pick) and what Todd Goldstein is capable of delivering hasn’t been this big a gap for nearly a decade. Whoever replaces Scott at the helm has a big call to make."
Click to expand...

If you read the whole article (you need to be a masochist) and if you hadn't seen the game, you would assume the Footsdogs won by a healthy margin. They seemed to be dominant all over the ground.
 
You blokes must have too much time on your hands to be reading rubbish views from a Dogs fan, when we saw with out own eyes that Goldstein was BOG by a country mile
 
 
tazaa said:
Best half of footy he has ever played.
Just immense.
Click to expand...
That 1 vs 3 contest where he punches it away over the boundary......showed/oozed desparation:- something he lacts showing this out on the park (probably one of the reasons why I'm not a huge fan)

If he were to have this in his repetoir every week no one would ever be critical of him.

It was easy to see he had a decent crack on Saturday........his 2nd best game to the one where he kicked 5 goals against Melbourne 2-3 yrs ago.
 
Last edited:
Much better opponent this week in Witts, come on Goldy, maintain the current form and give us the edge at ball ups.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

giantroo
Past #15: Daniel Howe - #31 in '14 ND to HFC - delisted end '22 - #33 in '23 RD to NM -retires from AFL & NM end '23 - 107 AFL games / 11 NM games
12 13 14 15 16
Replies
399
Views
28K
r00boy96
r00boy96

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top