- Moderator
- #9,801
Scott Selwood as a delisted free agent? Handy midfield depth with a senior body?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Scott Selwood as a delisted free agent? Handy midfield depth with a senior body?
Yep, spent most of the finals series being a thug and a fake tough guy than actually playing football. The guy, as talented as he is, seems like more of a liability and you have no clue what he will do next. Wonder how many frees he gives away, liability because of how he plays.
Playing well looks easy when you always have a teammate in the right position to receive a handball or kick. That is definitely not to be underestimated.You think so? Stack on the half back line and Pickett in the centre? Deluca selection is strange considering we identified in this trade period would target small forwards.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Same goes, big noseYou're entitled to your bad opinion.
I see Doc stepping into the Murphy role. Is (was) a beautiful field kick and reads it well. I think he'll be used as a Mid this year regardless.Only concern is we haven't addressed our midfield needs. Yes Papely may pinch hit in there, however Ed and Smurph aren't getting any younger.
Absolutely agree, alternatively at 186cm ht , I'd play Martin on a wing swap him with Murphy and give some respite to the midfield. Forward line would be just as deadly and our midfield enhanced.
I got blocked last week, I survivedHow will I ever survive?
I'd be happy for Doc to get on the park and get a kick for starters..I see Doc stepping into the Murphy role. Is (was) a beautiful field kick and reads it well. I think he'll be used as a Mid this year regardless.
To explain myself-I don't understand this rationale at all. Lets put this in perspective.
Papley has kicked 37 goals this season - averaged 1.5 goals per game over his career - he's worth every bit of pick 8 in a weak draft to our list.
Jack Martin is also an absolute gun who in the right environment away from the abyss that is GC will , I have no doubt, prove his worth as a game changer. If push came to shove I'd give up our first next year with their future second that the AFL gave them coming back. I'd trade Levi for him in a heartbeat if that was all it took. Mark my words now under Andrew Russell and in our forward line Jack Martin will flourish and whatever we pay for him will look like nothing. He is the cherry on the cake. Two players who are absolute dynamite smalls want to come to our football club and into our forward line and from 2020 as a package will easily contribute 45 plus goals to our season if they play 18 games each and produce their career average - it will be more in my opinion. For a team with 3 tall forwards like ours you pay whatever the price is for these two small forwards to sit at their feet. I will accept nothing less than 2 deals getting done and if 2 first rounders is what it takes then so be it. You won't be thinking about the draft picks with Papley and Martin at the feet of Harry and Charlie for the next 8 years!
I can respect thatCan't disagree with this any more. Each pick is for best available and needs. We are desperate for small forwards and sometimes you pay what you have to to achieve this. So what if they cost us a 1st each, if they kick winning goal next year I'm sure it won't matter what we pay
Was thinking 2 firsts for a gun mid, see what we can do with Butler and Betts (third and fourth), use a second for Martin or another winger/hb flanker with potential.Reckon the CLub has enough high draft pick kids needing development on the books - is there a standout draftee you'd use pick#9 on? Personally I'd like to see SOS think more about nailing some lower order draftees and using what little high pick currency he has on developed players like - Papley/Martin or even better still a decent back up midfielder to Cripps.
To explain myself-
I don't think either have done anything in particular of note.
Agree they are talented and can potentially be very good players but 1 good season for Paps and numerous flashes of talent from Martin don't spell very good solid effective contributor.
Second round picks are for these players, especially pocket and flank players.
Firsts are for good, reliable and contributing mids and key position players.
2 firsts for special/gun mids and key position players.
Martin and Papley would be pocket and flank therefore seconds.
Early seconds yes as I think they can be very good (wouldn't trade for them otherwise) but still seconds and not firsts.
Anyway, what can any of us do but hope for the best
I'll be more disappointed if it happens in reality as opposed to a suggestion on an internet forum.What’s the difference between unhappy and seriously unhappy when the word seriously is meant to properly operate as an adjective? Asking for a friend![]()

Respite on a wing? (Or did I misread that?Absolutely agree, alternatively at 186cm ht , I'd play Martin on a wing swap him with Murphy and give some respite to the midfield. Forward line would be just as deadly and our midfield enhanced.
You've simply quoted a bunch of players that didn't work out. I'm pretty sure a few of those (GWS) were salary dumps and other were probably rated better than 'risk' at the time. At least try keeping a neutral point of view, rather than condemning SOS for every single pick that hasn't worked out.Deluca, Finbar, Garlett, Lobbe, Mullett, Shaw, O'Shea, Polson, Lebois, Kerr, Bugg weren't risks? Apart from Williamson and Gibbons only decent late picks out of the lot. And that's not counting the GWS players like, Gorringe, Pickett, Sumner, Lamb.
Like Donkey KongIt's on......
I understand what you are saying but the way I look at it is that you can only play so many mids so you’ll end up playing good mids as flankers where a flanker would be the better player in that role anyway.To explain myself-
I don't think either have done anything in particular of note.
Agree they are talented and can potentially be very good players but 1 good season for Paps and numerous flashes of talent from Martin don't spell very good solid effective contributor.
Second round picks are for these players, especially pocket and flank players.
Firsts are for good, reliable and contributing mids and key position players.
2 firsts for special/gun mids and key position players.
Martin and Papley would be pocket and flank therefore seconds.
Early seconds yes as I think they can be very good (wouldn't trade for them otherwise) but still seconds and not firsts.
Anyway, what can any of us do but hope for the best
Was thinking 2 firsts for a gun mid, see what we can do with Butler and Betts (third and fourth), use a second for Martin or another winger/hb flanker with potential.
I'm looking forward to Pit-Bull Papley's aggression at the ball. Carlton needs some mongrel, but not Toby Greene mongrel.WRT papley.. career goal avg of 1.5 is something of note imo
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
I think Dow might be a better player if he was playing for a team higher up the ladder. But i'd keep persisting with him, especially given the work he is doing with Diesel.Dow is two years away. Minimum. He’s a nervous Nellie. Stocker, on the other hand, is what you want in a hard nosed midfielder. He’s not nervous. He’s Greg Williams like arrogant.
Dow may be very good trade bait at the end of 2020!