- Sep 25, 2013
- 16,122
- 31,149
Doesn't look good if we gave up on other targets to pursue them. If we had no other targets and stuck firm with our offer, no harm, no foul.
Nobody can deny that we agreed to pay overs for Papley as a contracted player and that Gold Coast were playing silly buggers for an unproven uncontracted player.
Just hope Papley and/or our other targets next year aren’t spooked by the deal not getting done, and that we take more due diligence in what is required (and what other deals must topple) at the trade table before we go public.
There were many posts from our ITKs saying it wasn’t reliant on a Daniher deal getting done. I know things change really quick but the Swans are a reasonable club and they seemed willing to deal. Just hope there was no stone left unturned, he is really what we need.




