Chief
~ Shmalpha ~
- Admin
- #176
Apparently the LNP:
* created a new sports grants program instead of expanding the existing Dept of Infrastructure program which was already distributing these exact grants,
* so they actively avoided using digital infrastructure designed to centralise grant applications and record keeping,
* thus keeping the program off the radar of various transparency mechanisms and side-stepping rules about approval of grants, and
* in doing so they made it more difficult to see where money was going in the hope they could cover their tracks as they pork-barreled marginal seats.
So when they say “no rules were broken” it’s because they kept the program separate from any infrastructure or process that could impose rules on the program administration.
* created a new sports grants program instead of expanding the existing Dept of Infrastructure program which was already distributing these exact grants,
* so they actively avoided using digital infrastructure designed to centralise grant applications and record keeping,
* thus keeping the program off the radar of various transparency mechanisms and side-stepping rules about approval of grants, and
* in doing so they made it more difficult to see where money was going in the hope they could cover their tracks as they pork-barreled marginal seats.
So when they say “no rules were broken” it’s because they kept the program separate from any infrastructure or process that could impose rules on the program administration.
sporting infrastructure grants were already available via Grantconnect from the Department of Infrastructure’s Regional Development programs. As Grantconnect shows, these were in 2018 already providing a wide range of grants for projects like upgrading change rooms and showers, improving playing surfaces, fixing tennis courts, providing Little Athletics facilities, or improving lighting.
Indeed, the new program was actually announced in the Department of Infrastructure budget papers, and its similarity to existing programs was referred to as “complementing existing government investments through regional development programs”.
Why did the government not simply expand the existing infrastructure programs that were already helping sports clubs around Australia?
Giving the program to infrastructure, however, would have meant the Commonwealth Grants Rules and Guidelines would have had to be applied. They require, as the Department of Finance explains, “that Ministers MUST not approve a grant or group of grants without first receiving written advice from officials on the merits of the grant or group of grants”. (Emphasis original.)
But the last thing the government wanted was written advice on the merits of grants — it wanted to pork barrel marginal electorates, not allocate grants on merit.
Last edited: