And I believe we are. Bucks stated publicly his desire to sit down with H and talk. That offer has been rejected because H wants to use Collingwood to shine a light on racism. I’m with his fight but he’s using the wrong source of light.
Of course he wants the 'militant view' Look/listen to his speech. CFC and football is not his god. In his mind he serves a higher purpose, chasing higher values. He is not looking to resolve things in a way that best suits the club or the individuals concerned privately. He wants this public. He wants this to serve a bigger purpose than his experience. He wants to change the world. Social Activism page 3, 2nd paragraph. Does it matter what you or I or the club will accept? Get in front of this one because there is a truck on the roll and if we don't move an insignificant football club will simply be another victim crushed under the wheels.
Maybe he is not a dobber? Maybe he wants to give them the opportunity to take the hot seat. Could be there is no one to name. Take ya pick.
If he wants to serve a higher purpose, why does he keep talking about himself?
Maybe he’s not the victim he wants you to believe.
From an old Herald Sun Article:
I think this is very likely. It’s an awful nickname. I wonder if he said anything about it at the time. Maybe he didn’t feel confident.
You seem to have an agenda involving our President and our coach. It comes through in a lot of your posting. Not sure why you have such a chip on your shoulder?
He apparently did not object till a meeting in 2013. It stopped immediately.
Alas it won’t happen here. There is no uprising or real change on the horizon. 230 years of Aboriginal oppression is not going to be recognised any tome soon in our constitution.
Well I don’t know anything about mushrooms but do know how stupid footy players can be. Coining a nickname like chimp is pretty dumb.
You are very wise.
Come on. He perceives he is a high profile example. If I get stamped on in my lowly place in life no one gives a. Harry is aware he has a powerful voice. He is using it, rightly or wrongly.
Maybe he isn't. I don't believe in anything really. I don't have to believe in anything here to come to an personal assessment of what is going on. I find Heritier's story in relationship to these events believable. Doesn't mean they actually happened. I observe the reaction of CFC and find it quite typical, text book like, of how organisations deal with such events. No personal certainty in either story. Don't need to know the truth to identify the right approach. Either say it never happened or say it did, with whatever qualifiers and get on with the job.
he's a liar you mean? stop being cryptic.
i'm sure you'll be able to sustain that allegation just as well as your previous character attacks on him. (ie . not at all)
Wow-Harry makes the most vile character attack on every person who was at the club during his stay there ( and makes sure the whole world gets to read it) and you are concerned about a comment on Big Footy questioning Harry's character?
When reading drivel like this try substituting Lumanba for Goodes and you'll realise you've heard it all before. "Attention seeking, relevance, spotlight, grandstanding" . Same old shite.
that "no further comment" didn't last long!
