Play Nice 45th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 14: Never failed a test I didn’t take

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Aug 12, 2012
21,219
40,280
sv_cheats 1
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
Edmonton Oilers
Last edited by a moderator:
Heres capitalism in action, it WORKS people!
View attachment 903158

Look, a FOX link and not a CNN link!
I agree, the US's medical etortion is disgusting. There are always caveats to total capitalism and medical supplies should be one of them.
 
Really don't want to disappear down this rabbit hole but has no-one ever told you about the Nordic states?

Y'know, all of which in varying degrees display a strong emphasis on socialist principles within their capitalist market-based economies, and all of which are among the most prosperous nations in the world?
Nordic states are not democratically socialist. They are states with government owned natural resources that use those funds to supply extensive welfare systems lol.
 
I agree, the US's medical etortion is disgusting. There are always caveats to total capitalism and medical supplies should be one of them.

Its not just the medical sector though!

Prisons!

FEEDING CHILDREN!

POWER GENERATION!

INSURANCE!

PAY DAY LOANS!

It is absolutely RAMPANT.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Only at the extreme, and that's sort of the point against the billionaires.

We all strive to maximise our living standard, but should also be willing to contribute to the protection of the disadvantaged. It follows that some degree of capitalism is necessary for modern society to function. It doesn't matter whether you label it a social democracy with incentives or a capitalist system with social responsibility / safety nets, there needs to be reward for productivity but effective social security.

It's a difficult balancing act, of course, as past and current experience demonstrates.

We're always going to have outliers in terms of excessive wealth and power, no matter what is the system.
You're right, it's all about the balancing act.

Which is why I get so pissed off with the SOCIALISM BAD MUH!!!! posting you see on here, when even our own bloody Coalition government maintains any number of policies that can clearly be described in varying degrees as socialist.

Intelligent people realised years ago that a blend of socialism and capitalism is the only sane way.

Anyway, not for this thread...
 
What it actually means is that looking at the issue from a good/bad, black/white perspective is for simpletons who dance like dumb puppets to whatever crap is being played - that is what it means
Except that the only person looking at it from that perspective on here is you.
 
What I don't get about the RW conspiracy theorists is they are always banging on about Gates & Soros trying to ruin their lives and take their freedoms but they can't join the dots that the "special" information they get from whatever site de jour is pushing it is created & disseminated by a thinktank funded by the Koch's & their ilk who actually ARE screwing things up for everyone else.

It's either that or Russian/Chinese trolls.

And they call everyone else Sheeple . . .

Destroying trust in traditional investigative journalism and objective scientific truth is the legacy of Bannon & Co and it's made the world a much worse place.
Yes they'd never read this book, would they?

61rbwjq32nL._SX322_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
 
Last edited:
There are already societies that are democratic socialist. None of them are prosperous.

Capitalism isn’t perfect but it does incentivise people to strive for success because they can see a tangible benefit to it for themselves and their family. Then from their excess (through taxes which pay for socialist programs), those who are impoverished can be lifted up.

It’s when people love money and accumulate wealth for the sake of it that issues arise. There is no reason for any one individual to have a billion dollars. That’s when you get idiots like Soros, Gates and Bezos trying to influence political agendas with their bias.

I think the Koch's have a greater desire to use their wealth 'politically'. Ie maximise more wealth.
 
He only names the billionaires who go against his own political bias.

That post was a sham, dressed up as a reasonable proposition.
Koch Bros, Mercer Family, Adelsons ring any bells?

Some posters do make me laugh because I can't believe they are being serious.
 
Really don't want to disappear down this rabbit hole but has no-one ever told you about the Nordic states?

Y'know, all of which in varying degrees display a strong emphasis on socialist principles within their capitalist market-based economies, and all of which are among the most prosperous nations in the world?

I've heard of them. And there's nothing wrong with having socialist principles, it just can't be the driving factor in your economy. Someone has to pay for everything.

You're talking about countries that combined have a similar population to Australia and about the same level of GDP, but with a landmass the equivalent of Western Australia.

The more dense your population is, the easier it becomes to service that population because you can offer centralised services.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I've heard of them. And there's nothing wrong with having socialist principles, it just can't be the driving factor in your economy. Someone has to pay for everything.
Everything is paid for in a properly-run democratic socialist economy. Such a stupid line, that.

You're talking about countries that combined have a similar population to Australia and about the same level of GDP, but with a landmass the equivalent of Western Australia.

The more dense your population is, the easier it becomes to service that population because you can offer centralised services.
Ah yes that old red herring. It's no argument at all. Compatibility to socialist policies has nothing to do with population density. Such a weird take.

Anyway, for another thread.
 
Heres capitalism in action, it WORKS people!
View attachment 903158

Look, a FOX link and not a CNN link!
Along with Repeal and Replace the Affordable Care Health Act, another of Trump's promises was to reduce the cost of prescription drugs.

Democrats have passed a bill in the house but has stalled with McConnell and Trump.


As an aside, I only just realised that Health Care Act has been in existence 10 years, surely the Republicans have had enough time to find an alternative before the Supreme Court decides.
 
Along with Repeal and Replace the Affordable Care Health Act, another of Trump's promises was to reduce the cost of prescription drugs.

Democrats have passed a bill in the house but has stalled with McConnell and Trump.


As an aside, I only just realised that Health Care Act has been in existence 10 years, surely the Republicans have had enough time to find an alternative before the Supreme Court decides.
On the plus side, they can build a statue about the Health Care Act now.
 
Having protests in a substantial number of cities, Seattle, New York, Chicago, St Louis, LA, Atlanta etc. Roughly around half the most populous cities in the US. And those are only the ones i'm aware of directly. I'm sure there are more. I haven't looked into it in detail but i'd assume so, happy for you to look into it further.

How many of the cities that had protests are seeing a rise in cases? In the cities that are seeing a rise in cases, are there any other factors that could have contributed to the rise? I mean, here in Australia there were protests everywhere, but we're only seeing a dramatic rise in cases in one state (so far). What does this mean for the correlation between protests and the rise in cases? Also, do you think it is possible that there may have been an ulterior motive for blaming the rise in cases on BLM protests, and not on the early easing of restrictions?
 
Everyone hires Bolton - globalcop needs people like Bolton - just like the resistance needs intelligence like yours

Look at you - there are a few autonomous brain cells in there - not many - but where there is life, there is hope

Dude I know you've really come unstuck the last few weeks, if your deranged posting over that period is any indication. But please, think. You're now posting about automony while doubling down on your initial statement that Trump has been 'courageous' in his response to Bolton. This is cheerleader, barracker type stuff, the furthest thing from an autonomous take that could be imagined. If 'everyone' hires Bolton, the courageous action would have been not to do that in the first place.

We both know that Trump's criticism of Bolton comes from nothing more than the 'stash breaking ranks and no longer towing the line. Its a pattern that has been repeated with other individuals more times than I can remember, they're always 'the best people' until they become critical of Trump - then suddenly, overnight, they become grifters, liars and utterly incompetent.

And you lap this shit up, time and time again. Not only that, but you gaslight and expect us to believe it as well. Its legit mind blowing. If you're not simply trolling for reactions, on this evidence you are at least as indoctrinated in the church of Trump as you accuse others of being re: the media, possibly more so - which is the only point I was making.

Trump has broken you, mate. Utterly, completely. Not for the first time, I implore you - pull yourself together for ****s sake.
 
Last edited:
You're right, it's all about the balancing act.

Which is why I get so pissed off with the SOCIALISM BAD MUH!!!! posting you see on here, when even our own bloody Coalition government maintains any number of policies that can clearly be described in varying degrees as socialist.

Intelligent people realised years ago that a blend of socialism and capitalism is the only sane way.

Anyway, not for this thread...

Most of the “Socialism is Bad” crowd wouldn’t have the first clue what socialism is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top