Oppo Camp Round 10 Non Pies Games

[Black_White]

Buckleys fault?

Yeah, why not?

 

[Black_White]

High scoring affair thus far.

Floodgates opening!

 

[Good_Old]

This game is yuck. Might just go to bed.

 

[Chameleon75]

I actually found out about the Richmond thing on the main board and as per usual the Tigers supporters think there's nothing wrong with it.

These would be the same people who would think it's disgusting if it was another team that was doing it.

Well George pell was their patron

 

[Anzacday]

I actually found out about the Richmond thing on the main board and as per usual the Tigers supporters think there's nothing wrong with it.

I know someone who doesn’t agree.

 

[Kirby]

I wouldn’t be. There is no longer any place in society where it is ok to touch someone’s arse or genitalia, without prior consent. Even footy clubs. This is clearly a breach of human rights, and also has implications for the integrity of the game. If the AFL has any courage they will take serious action.

Breach of human rights?

You really are a sensitive soul.

He’s already said he doesn’t know what the fuss is about. If he’s not offended then why are you?

 

[gouki88]

Breach of human rights?

You really are a sensitive soul.

He’s already said he doesn’t know what the fuss is about. If he’s not offended then why are you?

What’s he supposed to do? Condemn a veteran player and damage his burgeoning career? Smh

It’s a sex crime

 

[Kirby]

What’s he supposed to do? Condemn a veteran player and damage his burgeoning career? Smh

It’s a sex crime

Ok then. You know exactly what he’s thinking and his motivations?

It’s not a crime if it’s all part of some mucking around they are doing and he’s not upset about it.

 

[gouki88]

Ok then. You know exactly what he’s thinking and his motivations?

It’s not a crime if it’s all part of some mucking around they are doing and he’s not upset about it.

This is such backwards thinking, jesus christ. You pretty obviously have no idea about the intricacies of sex crime or trauma. Opinions like “they were just horsing around” belong in the bin

 

[Moore of the Same]

This has turned into a decent game.

 

[Black_White]

Ok then. You know exactly what he’s thinking and his motivations?

It’s not a crime if it’s all part of some mucking around they are doing and he’s not upset about it.

Sex crimes occur in the workplace when those who have power, or perceived power, use that power to do as they like.
Workplace laws are framed exactly to overcome this misbalance and remove excuses such as “mucking about”.

 

[unplugged]

Not sure who I even want to win this...

 

[gouki88]

I’ve not been watching, but I see Heater has 2 goals.

What’s going on? lol

 

[danielnajdek]

Nice acting

 

[DinoSoar]

Nice acting

It was rather spectacular, dare I say Papley-esque.

 

[Moore of the Same]

Not sure who I even want to win this...

I wanted the bombers but thats not going to happen.

 

[left at home]

Yep acting by ward, got the desired result, goal and a win

 

[Moore of the Same]

Dan Butler caught on camera as well. Tigers culture eh?

 

[Sea fog]

Yep acting by ward, got the desired result, goal and a win

Charity free.

 

[Kirby]

This is such backwards thinking, jesus christ. You pretty obviously have no idea about the intricacies of sex crime or trauma. Opinions like “they were just horsing around” belong in the bin

You’re the ignorant one as you have no idea. You are imposing your interpretation of motivations of which you know nothing about.

 

[Kirby]

Sex crimes occur in the workplace when those who have power, or perceived power, use that power to do as they like.
Workplace laws are framed exactly to overcome this misbalance and remove excuses such as “mucking about”.

Except if they are mucking about consentually. Of course, you don’t know that do you?

Do you know if Chol has been involved in the same mucking about onto others?

All you’ve seen is two edited pieces of video of 2 events and then imported your interpretation onto them.

You have no idea of the background. Chol has categorically stated there is nothing in it, so you assume he has no choice?

And posters on this board get pissed off at what people are claiming against JDG , also without proof?

This is exactly why our system isn’t based upon trial by media.

 

[Black_White]

Except if they are mucking about consentually. Of course, you don’t know that do you?

Do you know if Chol has been involved in the same mucking about onto others?

All you’ve seen is two edited pieces of video of 2 events and then imported your interpretation onto them.

You have no idea of the background. Chol has categorically stated there is nothing in it, so you assume he has no choice?

And posters on this board get pissed off at what people are claiming against JDG , also without proof?

This is exactly why our system isn’t based upon trial by media.

You seem to miss the point about those in power.
As I’ve stated, the laws are written exactly with your excuses in mind.
In this case senior players have the power and the new boy on the block cannot speak up, in fact the pressure is for the new boy to make a joke of it.
Understand how the law works in this regard and you understand what may be happening here.

Ive made no assumptions apart what the law as written assumes.

 

[Kirby]

You seem to miss the point about those in power.
As I’ve stated, the laws are written exactly with your excuses in mind.
In this case senior players have the power and the new boy on the block cannot speak up, in fact the pressure is for the new boy to make a joke of it.
Understand how the law works in this regard and you understand what may be happening here.

Ive made no assumptions apart what the law as written assumes.

You are making assumptions on the facts. You are making assumptions on motivation.

It’s hilarious that you are telling a person who practices in this area the law.

This is exactly why the law doesn’t let people like you judge people on snippets of vision on tv and no actual evidence.

 

[Sea fog]

You seem to miss the point about those in power.
As I’ve stated, the laws are written exactly with your excuses in mind.
In this case senior players have the power and the new boy on the block cannot speak up, in fact the pressure is for the new boy to make a joke of it.
Understand how the law works in this regard and you understand what may be happening here.

Ive made no assumptions apart what the law as written assumes.

I see your point because Chol is the last kid on the block and if he speaks up he might be breaking some secret rules. He wants to retain his place in the team. It also seems like some sort of weird initiation game.

 

[No SPIN]

Breach of human rights?

You really are a sensitive soul.

He’s already said he doesn’t know what the fuss is about. If he’s not offended then why are you?

What did you expect him to say?
It’s called self preservation.