They shut him down. They pushed him so wide he had to take his shots from way out on an angle. He sprayed 2 gettable shots but the others were tough kicks. McKenzie did a good job.Port didn't even shut him down, he just kicked very poorly
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They shut him down. They pushed him so wide he had to take his shots from way out on an angle. He sprayed 2 gettable shots but the others were tough kicks. McKenzie did a good job.Port didn't even shut him down, he just kicked very poorly
They shut him down. They pushed him so wide he had to take his shots from way out on an angle. He sprayed 2 gettable shots but the others were tough kicks. McKenzie did a good job.
Tough kicks he usually jags.They shut him down. They pushed him so wide he had to take his shots from way out on an angle. He sprayed 2 gettable shots but the others were tough kicks. McKenzie did a good job.
I call bullshit
how the crap would you know that?
This is complete nonsense.Tough kicks he usually jags.
Anytime you give a forward 6 shots you haven't shut him down.
It really isn't.This is complete nonsense.
I also remember seeing this education training video where they now ask all the kids about to start school "who is your daddy, and what does he do?"Believe it or not but there are people in schools called Enrolment Registrars.
In an Austrian accent no lessI also remember seeing this education training video where they now ask all the kids about to start school "who is your daddy, and what does he do?"
Just because he's usually accurate is completely irrelevant. Yes he should have kicked those 2 easy ones but that doesn't nullify all the good work McKenzie did to make his other shots difficult. It's incredibly hard to blanket a guy like Hawkins, especially when he's in career best form. The best most teams can muster is to make his shots as difficult as possible and Port's defenders did that. That's a tick to the coaches and defenders, any day of the week.It really isn't.
Hawkins is a very solid kick more often than not. Even the 2 sitters he missed would've changed the game.
If you'd told Ports coaches pre game that Hawkins would have 6 shots at goal during the game they'd have been extremely concernedJust because he's usually accurate is completely irrelevant. Yes he should have kicked those 2 easy ones but that doesn't nullify all the good work McKenzie did to make his other shots difficult. It's incredibly hard to blanket a guy like Hawkins, especially when he's in career best form. The best most teams can muster is to make his shots as difficult as possible and Port's defenders did that. That's a tick to the coaches and defenders, any day of the week.
If you told Port's coaches he's end up taking those shots from the bleachers and missing all of them, I think they'd take it.If you'd told Ports coaches pre game that Hawkins would have 6 shots at goal during the game they'd have been extremely concerned
Says who ?? Port transitioned the ball extremely well, Hawkins gave them the opportunity.If you told Port's coaches he's end up taking those shots from the bleachers and missing all of them, I think they'd take it.
You need to work on your math too. Hawkins kicking those 2 goals wouldn't have changed the result.
I just think you're showing your bias against Port. If that were Talia, I doubt you'd be calling it this way.Says who ?? Port transitioned the ball extremely well, Hawkins gave them the opportunity.
Yeah they won by 3 goals but missing easy shots saps momentum.
If he gets 6 shots from the same spots this week he'll kick 4.
In any case, we're detailing the thread a bit.... Or deRahillying it.
They played great footy, no question.I just think you're showing your bias against Port. If that were Talia, I doubt you'd be calling it this way.
I don't like Port either but that's mostly down to w***ers like Kornes and their feral, banana throwing, supporter base. Good footy is good footy though, no matter who the team is.
If you told Port's coaches he's end up taking those shots from the bleachers and missing all of them, I think they'd take it.
You need to work on your math too. Hawkins kicking those 2 goals wouldn't have changed the result.
I'm of the mind that you make your own luck. Good defense forcing forwards to take difficult shots is an example of that.You'd take it, and you'd be happy with that result are two vastly different things. Giving the in form forward of the competition 6 shots, even if 4 of them are lowish percentage, and ending up with a result of 0.5 with one out on the full is the equivalent of playing with fire and getting through it unscathed. Port got lucky there, and another day that's 3.3 or better. They'd be realistic enough to know it too; they'd have to be if they had any desire of winning it all this year.
Even better than the mythical Showdown where he shut down Robbie Gray?In Hartigan's Greatest Game In History he kept Hawkins to a mere 6 shots at goal
I'm of the mind that you make your own luck. Good defense forcing forwards to take difficult shots is an example of that.
Sorry... I should have said that it was his Second Greatest GameEven better than the mythical Showdown where he shut down Robbie Gray?
Believe it or not but there are people in schools called Enrolment Registrars.
Only the male footy journalists are ugly. You’re not allowed to call the ugly female footy journalists ugly.Just confirming, that despite the misleading Thread title and 92 posts currently, there is actually no confirmation as yet? Except that all footy journalists are fugly?
On CPH1831 using BigFooty.com mobile app
Not a very professional one if so.and that’s you?
and that’s you?