Gawn is a gun with a huge engine, and Jackson is a freak.
Be like having peak Goldy and 1994 McKernan in your team. 2022 Goldy and X ain’t giving you that output.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Gawn is a gun with a huge engine, and Jackson is a freak.
When you get beat by 70 points and a guy in the VFL wins you the game you play him. Chom and Curtis are both in.
The ball could not rebound out of there any easier than it is now.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Vardy and Lycett won 2018, McEvoy and Hale 2015 were good at their roles, not world beaters. My point is the set up can work, and we can go with 2 rucks with 2 tall forwards with the right set upGawn is a gun with a huge engine, and Jackson is a freak.
Vardy and Lycett won 2018, McEvoy and Hale 2015 were good at their roles, not world beaters. My point is the set up can work, and we can go with 2 rucks with 2 tall forwards with the right set up
that’s our problem, all our crumbing forwards are essentially resting midfielders.. Curtis will make a massive difference, he looks like a Charlie Cameron type who reads the ball off the pack and can do the mercurial.Of course, the other thing that allows Melbourne to play Gawn and Jackson along with Brown and McDonald and even Fritsch who plays much taller than his height is that they have Pickett and Spargo and Sparrow as manic small forwards creating tremendous pressure when the ball hits the deck.
So can Chom and Souve.Walker can give xerri a chopout
It’s easy to be critical of X for dropping marks as yeah they were probably ones he should have grabbed, there is a little to be said for experience and getting completely up to speed with the top level game, I’d expect him to improve that aspect, compared to last year he is clunking a lot more marks generally.Not sure why we would be keeping X in at the expense of this bloke, Chom looked great in the Vfl.
Goody was huge against Swans playing in his correct position
I’m not saying X won’t get there but 2 dropped uncontested marks and little other impact on the game. Goldy can ruck all day. Need a chip out through CZ in there for 3 mins a quarter.
X mucked up a couple of things on the weekend playing game 17, need to persist. I reckon you can play all three of X, Goldy and Chom - Chom is a completely different player to CCJ so I don't see us having the same structural issues as round 1.Not sure why we would be keeping X in at the expense of this bloke, Chom looked great in the Vfl.
Goody was huge against Swans playing in his correct position
I’m not saying X won’t get there but 2 dropped uncontested marks and little other impact on the game. Goldy can ruck all day. Need a chip out through CZ in there for 3 mins a quarter.
X mucked up a couple of things on the weekend playing game 17, need to persist. I reckon you can play all three of X, Goldy and Chom - Chom is a completely different player to CCJ so I don't see us having the same structural issues as round 1.
I disagree that Goldy has two years and again I don’t have the confidence that he can still be a week in week out solo ruck. We do have to prepare for life without him particularly as (hopefully) his exit will likely occur when the kids have developed into a finals bound side. X or CCJ (or both ) need to be ready by then. It will mean we need to put up with the growing pains now but not when he’s gone. His role now can be very important to give a bit of cover and experience to x, ccjI appreciate X has only played 17 games, and blokes make mistakes. There is alot to like about X. I am all in favor of playing every young player we have over an older player (however this is my exception). In my opinion Goldy is a generational ruckman, and i would give him the opportunity to see if he can still ruck all day. I think Goldy still has a solid 2 years left... but thats just me and i dont believe that X has the scope to be a generational ruckman.
I rate Comben really high, strong mark, mobile and skilled, but more than anything he keeps his feet. I also think that resting Goldy or X forward is going to hinder this guys development. So really if one of Goldy or X has to make way out of the side for this guy, and i would choose Goldy over X.
i thought playing 3 talls ruins the structure? now we're all for playing 3 talls just because a guy plays well in the VFL.
R1 we played 1 KPF and 3 ruck-forwards, which is a bit different to playing 2 genuine KPFs and 2 rucksi thought playing 3 talls ruins the structure? now we're all for playing 3 talls just because a guy plays well in the VFL.
Well I cant speak for anyone else but I'm in favour of him coming in for Goldy if we're going to continue to insist on Goldy playing as a KPFi thought playing 3 talls ruins the structure? now we're all for playing 3 talls just because a guy plays well in the VFL.
We played 3 ruckmen, not 3 talls.i thought playing 3 talls ruins the structure? now we're all for playing 3 talls just because a guy plays well in the VFL.
I reckon it'll be Curtis this week and then Chom 1-2 weeks after. I'm all for sooner though.Get him in.
The coaches have to make the tough call between Goldy and X because it’s not working and very costly.