Remove this Banner Ad

Club Mgmt. Board of Directors as led by President Dave Barham - Statement from Barham addressing Merrett etc - 12/9

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
 
Last edited:
So we’re not going to get any input from the external review with regards to the head coach or CEO positions, we’re just going to sort those out separate to the review?

Shouldn’t we be taking feedback from the external review on filling those positions so we don’t make the same mistakes as before?
 
is it though?

half the blokes at Essendon have jobs cause of mates, id expect hird's kids would be walk up starts to a company that had Essendon people as board members/directors.
What do you mean? That’s the definition of an incestuous workplace — everyone at the club is linked to everyone else in ways that aren’t specifically their professional roles in (or as family of) the club hierarchy.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

What do you mean? That’s the definition of an incestuous workplace — everyone at the club is linked to everyone else in ways that aren’t specifically their professional roles in (or as family of) the club hierarchy.

no i mean it isn't interesting she ended up at PWC.
 
I would hope soon, the reality though is likely after the draft if he is to go.
Dodoro blued with Rutten, and was one of the key proponents in getting Campbell removed from footy discussion at the end of 2020.
Not to mention his chief backer (Sheedy) crossed the floor to seize power with Barham.

Dodoros position is strengthening, not weakening
 
Dodoro blued with Rutten, and was one of the key proponents in getting Campbell removed from footy discussion at the end of 2020.
Not to mention his chief backer (Sheedy) crossed the floor to seize power with Barham.

Dodoros position is strengthening, not weakening
I'm sadly aware.
 
Dodoro blued with Rutten, and was one of the key proponents in getting Campbell removed from footy discussion at the end of 2020.
Not to mention his chief backer (Sheedy) crossed the floor to seize power with Barham.

Dodoros position is strengthening, not weakening

Whether people like Dodoro or not, XC meddling in the football department seemed counterproductive, so that was probably a good outcome.
 
Gotta break a few eggs to make an omelette
scale;webp=auto;jpeg_quality=60.jpg
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Hang on, Chief Commercial Officer - not COO (which is the usual title of the heir apparent). We left the COO role unfilled when Rodski left didn’t we?
It's usually the COO or CFO.
 
Can someone please catch me up with the various factions here?
There is/was: Dodoro + Sheedy + ??
Campbell + Brasher + ??
Where do Barham and Madden sit?
Mahoney?
 
Great post 👏👏

Feel too many got caught up in how rutten was treated last week (very poorly). People thought this was only about getting clarko, no it was about a guy who was sick of the club wallowing in mediocrity and wanted change.
It’s funny how the footy public are laughing at us because our ceo quit. When all essendon fans are jumping for joy 😂
It was about moving Truck but it was a panic move based on missing out on Clarkson. If he was not available all this happens after the last round with less circus .
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

So we’re not going to get any input from the external review with regards to the head coach or CEO positions, we’re just going to sort those out separate to the review?

Shouldn’t we be taking feedback from the external review on filling those positions so we don’t make the same mistakes as before?
Agree. Seems odd that they're making all these major calls before the review even gets underway.

Oh wait, no it doesn't..
 
Did a more than acceptable job with the commercial side of it so I’ve got no doubt he’ll land on his feet in the sports industry but as far as footy goes. Yikes.

There was a time where appointing him so young was ‘bold and courageous’
 
Campbell now gone.

I owe a few people responses to some posts. I haven't forgotten, particularly JayJ20.

My impression of a lot of the discussion here is that we got side tracked with what was really the least relevant thing that happened last week: the treatment of Rutten. That's a human story, I feel and felt for the man but, at the end of the day, it was just noise.

There are only 18 jobs available. Gun coaches will coach us because they are unfulfilled without flags and/or because they have the egos to believe they can turn this ship around. That ego is an essential part of being a coach.

However, and in terms of the discussion here, Barham was caricatured and posters then became polarised into 2 camps: a) the players are the problem; or b) Rutten was the problem.

It was never that simple and I don't analyse based on caricatures. The truth is that it was a combination together with the football department leadership and executive.

Barham was right when he resigned, as the internal review was announced, only to be talked into staying on. He was right 10 days ago, too.

Sure, things were messy but that's politics. He can't just assume control of the board. He needed votes and the balance of votes was tied in with sycophants who needed something more than Barham's opinion. The botched internal review provided that.

An external review will now take place. Campbell has jumped or been pushed to protect his reputation. While I would like him to suffer the indignity Rutten has suffered it doesn't matter. His departure is the main thing.

I would like it to be official that Rutten's appointment was really just a way to deflect from mistakes, more than being a reflection of the belief that he was the best person to coach Essendon, read Cal's article from earlier this week, it makes it easier to move on (if you haven't already). But that's not important and Rutten has been through enough.

We are getting close to a blank slate. This should make a review easier because it will not feel the need to be diplomatic at least in terms of the recommendations.

So far so good.
One point here . The internal review was not botched. For some reason it took of in the media and then the public that it was something it was not. Brasher stated at the time it was never a review on positions but a review on how they could improve the player development and recruiting and the scope to spend more money to bolster them.

Should they have done an external review. Yes it is needed but the internal review is exactly what it was set up to be.
The mistake Brasher made was announcing it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top