- Dec 11, 2009
- 36,034
- 48,716
- AFL Club
- Geelong
I won't say much more but there's 'allegedly' stuff that hasn't been made public.
This relates to a recent re-signing, yeah?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I won't say much more but there's 'allegedly' stuff that hasn't been made public.
We want Clark. Hawthorn do too.
This is about Tuohy getting payed hopefully, he probably can’t be guaranteed best 22 in our side next year with MOC and Bowes coming in.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Fr2And if he stays at Pieland for a 1 year deal, how do we get him next year? With what?
Rendell on TR just then.
"If Henry does go to the draft a club will pick him in the top 10"
Some of the stuff that comes out of this amoebas gob is amazing.
Nah man.Old mate needs to remake his song clip..
Jack Bowes for nothin
Jack Bowes for nothin pick 7 for free!
It'd be good if they knew the other reasons. It might make a Collingwood recent re-signing much more headline worthy.![]()
Ironically, the best on-paper outcome for us is taking him in the draft. We get Henry for what we were prepared to give up anyway, and a rival club gets no compensation for a best 25 player.
In trying to avoid giving Geelong a leg up, the Pies may unwittingly do just that.
I must say I love this time of year. It's like a drama and I absolutely eat up all the storylines.
Some people are not very footy smart people saying Hooper is over rated, on here, we will see
Stephen Hooper?Some people are not very footy smart people saying Hooper is over rated, on here, we will see
What does "directly" mean in this case? If it's accompanied by a player is that "indirectly"?
I think what it means is we trade 7 directly back to them but if its a 3 club trade where they get a different pick we can.
Ie lets say we trade 7 and something for 5
St kilda trade 9 and something for 7 (could be any club)
Gc get 9 and picks from the other 2 clubs
Geel get 5 saints get 7
Is legal
But if 7 goes straight back to gc it isnt legal.
lol fixed itStephen Hooper?
Yeah I don't get it either.Were did this Touhy going crap come from, bloody hell people on here have lost it
Were did this Touhy going crap come from, bloody hell people on here have lost it
Same thing could be said about Henry at Collingwood but, hey, he ain't playing at AFL level every week either.Parfitt is too good a player to not be playing AFL level every week. He probably won’t get to do that at Geelong if everyone is fit and well. Seems a bit of a waste.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Wouldn’t be unhappy with Menegola but not the Irish AmbassadorThere's word that Pick 5 is in play, and some speculation about a player being needed to close the deal has led to Touhy as being the prime candidate.
I call bullshit Touhy said he would give the game away, if cats did not sign him for 2023There's word that Pick 5 is in play, and some speculation about a player being needed to close the deal has led to Touhy as being the prime candidate.
McKenna may be a slight downgrade on Tuohy...but McKenna is 26 and Tuohy 32.That's a downgrade on Tuohy.
I said earlier on here that he wouldn't get a game for us this year on his form.
I watched Hopper + Bruhn very, very closely this year... Neither impressed me.
That's not to say that things can't change because Hopper was probably not fully fit and Bruhn was basically blacklisted from the middle of the ground.
Just purely going off what I saw this year with my own eyes.