![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/adelaide.png)
Magma
TheBrownDog
just have to wait for the milan clubs to cry again and then ffp will be relaxed again.Yep, thats vibe of it.
If it was old money doing it no one would care as much.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
just have to wait for the milan clubs to cry again and then ffp will be relaxed again.Yep, thats vibe of it.
If it was old money doing it no one would care as much.
Can't think of any valid reason to change the amortisation rules. Just seems typical UEFA reactionary bollocks, no doubt as a result of pressure from clubs that don't want to give out long term contracts (but don't want anyone else to have the benefit either).
PMSL.
Using a buy back clause is snide?I see. Behaving in a snide fashion is ok if it's your own club doing it.
Using a buy back clause is snide?
Ha ha. Another one.PMSL.
I didn't propose that.When used to try and block a transfer to another club like you propose. Yes.
I didn't propose that.
But it's telling that you didn't have a problem with Spurs trying to avoid paying a sell on clause to us, but have a problem with us using a buyback clause on a player we sold.
Really? Clubs signing players on unrealistically long contracts not a valid reason? That's clearly an FFP cheat/workaround.
It must also be mentioned that FIFA, who govern all transfers, stipulate contract lengths should be no longer than 5 years. Not must be, but should be.
Ha ha ha.Spurs don't pay the sell on clause. So no, I don't have a problem with them avoiding something that they don't pay.
It's no more a cheat than giving a player a contract extension. That reduces amortisation too.
So FIFA who govern all transfers stipulate that if you want to give longer than a 5 year contract to a player you are entitled to. Correct?
Allison, Luis Diaz and Cody Gakpo all joined Liverpool on longer than 5 years contract FWIW.
PMSL. But but but but.2 of those players joined mid season. They signed 5.5 year contracts which is entirely within the norm for mid season transfers - of course the club isn't going to have their contracts expiring mid season. No 7.5 or 8.5 year contracts for them.
Allison signed a 6 year deal so hardly groundbreaking. He's a keeper who also tend to stay around longer if they end up being top class.
I'm not sure why you are even bringing up Liverpool here, bit obsessive.
If City can buy him back for 20m and then sell him to Spurs for 35m why wouldn't they?
Seems smart business.
I don't see the problem either. With FFP rules if you can make an easy 15m without any problems why wouldn't any club do itIf City can buy him back for 20m and then sell him to Spurs for 35m why wouldn't they?
Seems smart business.
PMSL. But but but but.
Just loan him with an obligation to buy. Easy way to get around itNot allowed to be at 3 different clubs in such a short time. They would have to loan him and Spurs would have to agree, plus the player would have to agree to going back to City.
Spurs will either sign him directly or not at all.
Not allowed to be at 3 different clubs in such a short time. They would have to loan him and Spurs would have to agree, plus the player would have to agree to going back to City.
Spurs will either sign him directly or not at all.
But but butThere's no buts here, just a bizarre obsession by yourself to redirect every conversation back to "what about this player at Liverpool". When the original discussion had nothing to do with Liverpool players.
Virtually all transfers signed mid season have a contract end date in the off season. Your argument is laughable.
He has to play an actual game for the team to count doesn't it?Not allowed to be at 3 different clubs in such a short time. They would have to loan him and Spurs would have to agree, plus the player would have to agree to going back to City.
Spurs will either sign him directly or not at all.
I don't see the problem either. With FFP rules if you can make an easy 15m without any problems why wouldn't any club do it
But but but
So you can be registered with three clubs as long as you only play for two.
Who would have guessed it.
Just loan him with an obligation to buy. Easy way to get around it