News AFL to overhaul the draft, discuss changes to Academy and FS bid matching

[Lore]

 

[H00t]

Ess offer a 2 year deal on 900 ... not much different to several lopsided deals. 900 triggers band1 and then later additional years are added that smooths the payment.


Sanders as a player that is beyond the bid process is a good piece of assistance

My only issue is the loading up of talent thru the draft does nothing for years. One might say North already have a lot of early pick talent. Add West Coast who look to be ready to clean house we are still going to have a couple of teams that are fringe afl standard and very vulnerable to injuries.

The AFL were meant to close that loophole after the lions did that with Daniher.

So if the AFL had any integrity that won’t fly (the AFL doesn’t do it might)

 

[Turbocat]

Same could be said for just about any draft assistance. Another reason why draft assistance is dumb.
Surely the AFL know this though. I wonder whether they just do it to give the club a bit of a sugar hit and retain a bit of supporter interest by selling hope when all looks pretty gloomy.

Probably limited to what they can do other than thru the draft. Even a bigger cap..will not alwasy get you the best players. The afl is not the nba ..you need a big group of players to have an impact... and they probably do not choose to go to North if they look years away. So drafy it is .. because kids get forced to go where they are picked.

 

[Turbocat]

The AFL were meant to close that loophole after the lions did that with Daniher.

So if the AFL had any integrity that won’t fly (the AFL doesn’t do it might)

How is it a loop hole? My bet every afl list would have players that either have front loaded or rear loaded contracts.

Of course if we want to try to reduce the weakening of the draft then we remove all compensation, all father sons, all academies etc ..because they all affect the socialistic goals of the draft.

 

[Dangerousfield]

The begging and whinging noise coming out of North and their fans is giving me a headache.

Can't be hurting other low ladder teams, who are getting on with rebuilds under their own steam, just to appease the incessant North bleating.

The kind of concessions being suggested are obscene, given North aren't even this years worse team!

 

[Nat Fyfe]

Secondly, you didn't lose out on any talent in any of those situations, because you never had access to Walter, Ashcroft or JUH. They were never part of the open draft pool, whether they were bid on before or after your pick, you still had access to the 2nd best prospect in the open draft pool.

Isn't that the point the other poster is making though, that they've lost out on talent because they didn't get access to some of the most talented kids in the draft? I've agreed with pretty much everything else said here, but it's undeniable that the academies/FS deprive other clubs of that talent by restricting the open draft pool

 

[naysayer]

Pick 3 is a compo pick and would have likely been available regardless.

Hawthorn wouldn't likely be picking Sanders at 3/4, so what's the issue?

FA compo? I can't seem to remember there being outrage when you were able to select Reid and Cox from the Danniher compo (Pick 7).

Or Pick 10 for Zac Williams?


Or how about Gold Coast receiving pick 3 as FA compo for Tom Lynch (Izak Rankine) in the strongest draft this decade?


All of these the biggest draft disgrace in history also?

Giving North draft assistance is like feeding the pigeons.

 

[Shadow89]

Is that meant to be a sledge? Some of his stuff is awesome - unless you're a vegan, a man playing in the Womens world cup or an orange oil protester.

Or an Australian.

 

[Strapping Young Lad]

They should only get picks at the back end of the first round and be made to trade them like last year.

They don’t need more top 3 kids, they need more seasoned bodies who aren’t trash.

 

[H00t]

How is it a loop hole? My bet every afl list would have players that either have front loaded or rear loaded contracts.

Of course if we want to try to reduce the weakening of the draft then we remove all compensation, all father sons, all academies etc ..because they all affect the socialistic goals of the draft.

Front or back ending the contract isn’t the problem. It’s doing it to give extra compensation to get around pick matching.

The AFL should just make it a player needs at least a 5 year contract to get band 1.

I still think FA compensation needs to be a thing. Just with tightened rules to prevent any funny business.

 

[Turbocat]

Front or back ending the contract isn’t the problem. It’s doing it to give extra compensation to get around pick matching.

The AFL should just make it a player needs at least a 5 year contract to get band 1.

I still think FA compensation needs to be a thing. Just with tightened rules to prevent any funny business.

The club that has the choice to match will always want the best comp. The destination club often is willing to pay more to avoid paying an draft collateral. You can adjust the rules ... and the affect might be that no one gets band one ... and in taht case every club matchs. Geelong and Cameron for example ..ist still did not matter as GWS knew tehy would get more form the trade than the comp. So its mainly an issue when a team is on the bottom and will get early draft comp.

I do not like comp but understand why its needed. It often affects the whole concept of FA .. where clubs trade for players to ensure it doesn't affect their compensation. Be far cleaner if there were no RFA. Its just FA. No matching... and no one gets R1 comp.

 

[Mich0]

I think it’s going to be a bad look if North don’t match any offer on McKay.

If they don’t match what reason would they have? They need key backs and will be more competitive in 2024 with him on the list.

The AFL will see North arnt even trying to be competitive with the Tin can out if they don’t try match any offers on McKay and I think it could impact decisions around compo. Why help a team who isn’t helping themself.

 

[Mich0]

Another issue of hoarding high draft picks in a small space of time is that they eventually will all want bigger pay packets at around the same time putting pressure on salary caps just as they start to become good.

 

[The Gtrain]

Another issue of hoarding high draft picks in a small space of time is that they eventually will all want bigger pay packets at around the same time putting pressure on salary caps just as they start to become good.

One of the concerns I have with the eagles drafting a heap of early picks, yeh it sounds great, but in 3-5 yrs time, it's a mass exodus like GWS.

 

[Farang83150]

Ess offer a 2 year deal on 900 ... not much different to several lopsided deals. 900 triggers band1 and then later additional years are added that smooths the payment.


Sanders as a player that is beyond the bid process is a good piece of assistance

My only issue is the loading up of talent thru the draft does nothing for years. One might say North already have a lot of early pick talent. Add West Coast who look to be ready to clean house we are still going to have a couple of teams that are fringe afl standard and very vulnerable to injuries.

But 1 won't be a continual financial drain on the comp.

 

[naysayer]

One of the concerns I have with the eagles drafting a heap of early picks, yeh it sounds great, but in 3-5 yrs time, it's a mass exodus like GWS.

GWS going just fine. A draft haul like Franklin/Roughead/Lewis is what the Eagles need, to go with the new coach.

 

[CaptainWorpedo]

GWS going just fine. A draft haul like Franklin/Roughead/Lewis is what the Eagles need, to go with the new coach.

Hell its what we need again.

 

[naysayer]

Hell its what we need again.

Well, would any club say no?

 

[Rookie]

Coming from a club that's going to benefit from a spine of JUH/Darcy/Croft for the next decade, I think the academies and current bidding systems are a joke.

But ditching the father son entirely removes one of the magical things about this game. Clubs shouldn't get a discount for bidding on a F/S and be able to pay for a highly rated youngster with a bunch of third round picks they traded down for, but a balance can be found without eroding the proud history and traditions of the game.

 

[Dockeroo]

There is simply no question that the draft is heavily compromised.
The biggest scandal is the suns taking 3 of the top 15 talents into their list via points matching. No one seems to be talking about that however.

I would love to see a completely and totally uncompromised draft for 10 years without any academy’s or FS picks.
Don’t like losing the “magic” of FS picks?
Tough. It’s a price well and truly worth paying for an uncompromised draft. A minor loss to the game in exchange for a major benefit for equalisation.

 

[Wild Bill]

Another issue of hoarding high draft picks in a small space of time is that they eventually will all want bigger pay packets at around the same time putting pressure on salary caps just as they start to become good.

What a terrible situation - being really good and having players wanting big dollars.

I don't know how Collingwood fans sleep at night.

 

[Tonga Bob]

The father-son rule exists to benefit Victorian clubs and clubs that relocated from Victoria (Weagles jagged a few because of course they did).
The northern academies exist to benefit clubs in non-traditional football states.
A couple of clubs benefit from both.
The rest of the league can go f*ck themselves.

 

[Obeanie1]

People focus on the effect early in the draft but its the later 1st round and early 2nd round picks that suffer the most.

This draft potentially could end up:

1. Reid - WC
2. Walter - academy bid matched Suns
3. McKercher - North
4. Curtin - Priority Pick North
5. Sanders - NGA bid matched North
6. Read - NGA bid matched Suns
7. Dursma - Hawks
8. Caddy - Melbourne
9. Watson - whoever traded for the Suns pick
10. Rogers - NGA bid matched by Suns

50% of the top 10 gone. And then there's the I dont want to move interstate issue.

With Croft and a Hawks father sons McCabe falling before 20.

So 7 top 20 players off the table for the rest of the comp.

THEN we have free agency compo for Himmelburg and possibley another.

So we can expect Eagles original pick 19 the 1st pick of the second round to start around pick 28. Geeez.

And I will point out in this scenario the recently labelled "Worse Team in AFL History" receive zero assistance. Nadda

Id like the AFL to justify how this actually works in equalisation?

 

[Wild Bill]

People focus on the effect early in the draft but its the later 1st round and early 2nd round picks that suffer the most.

This draft potentially could end up:

1. Reid - WC
2. Walter - academy bid matched Suns
3. McKercher - North
4. Curtin - Priority Pick North
5. Sanders - NGA bid matched North
6. Read - NGA bid matched Suns
7. Dursma - Hawks
8. Watson - whoever traded for the Suns pick
9. Rogers - NGA bid matched by Suns
10. O'Sullivan - Swans

With Croft and a Hawks father sons McCabe falling before 20.

So 7 top 20 players off the table for the rest of the comp.

THEN we have free agency compo for Himmelburg and possibley another.

So we can expect Eagles original pick 19 the 1st pick of the second round to start around pick 28. Geeez.

And I will point out in this scenario the recently labelled "Worse Team in AFL History" receive zero assistance. Nadda

Id like the AFL to justify how this actually works in equalisation?

This is your 2nd terrible season. We got crappy assistance at the end of our 3rd terrible season.

You may get a couple of late picks that you must trade at the end of next year if you have another shocking year.

You should be hoping we get something good this year which will open the door for the Eagles at the end of 2025 if you’re still woeful.

 

[Dockeroo]

People focus on the effect early in the draft but its the later 1st round and early 2nd round picks that suffer the most.

This draft potentially could end up:

1. Reid - WC
2. Walter - academy bid matched Suns
3. McKercher - North
4. Curtin - Priority Pick North
5. Sanders - NGA bid matched North
6. Read - NGA bid matched Suns
7. Dursma - Hawks
8. Watson - whoever traded for the Suns pick
9. Rogers - NGA bid matched by Suns
10. O'Sullivan - Swans

With Croft and a Hawks father sons McCabe falling before 20.

So 7 top 20 players off the table for the rest of the comp.

THEN we have free agency compo for Himmelburg and possibley another.

So we can expect Eagles original pick 19 the 1st pick of the second round to start around pick 28. Geeez.

And I will point out in this scenario the recently labelled "Worse Team in AFL History" receive zero assistance. Nadda

Id like the AFL to justify how this actually works in equalisation?

It’s completely ****ed

 

[Makeshift Park]

1. Reid - WC
2. Walter - academy bid matched Suns
3. McKercher - North
4. Curtin - Priority Pick North
5. Sanders - NGA bid matched North
6. Read - NGA bid matched Suns
7. Dursma - Hawks
8. Watson - whoever traded for the Suns pick
9. Rogers - NGA bid matched by Suns
10. O'Sullivan - Swans

Pretty sure this is exactly what Keating was talking about when he described "a beautiful set of numbers".