- Moderator
- #76
Adelaides is available, I just dont want to pay for it lol - waiting for the public release on their site. GWS yet to post.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
That's a disaster for the swans, how could you possibly have that amount of losses when you had the perfect season except the g.f? What if they finished bottom 4, would it have been a 10 mill loss? Great work Tom Harley.
The headline number doesn't tell the full story. The amount of cash on hand has risen from $724,142 to $2,644,697 which tells the true story for the Swans. The headline figure is down to the ongoing cost for the Royal Hall of Industries and a $3 million rise in staff wages.
Perfectly happy with that result.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Surely staff wages and the royal hall would have been budgeted for though and they are not costs that are going to disappear this year, so will this become an annual thing is the worry.
Why?? Did u actually read the financials and compare it to a few years ago and more importantly comprehend them?That's a disaster for the swans, how could you possibly have that amount of losses when you had the perfect season except the g.f? What if they finished bottom 4, would it have been a 10 mill loss? Great work Tom Harley.
Why?? Did u actually read the financials and compare it to a few years ago and more importantly comprehend them?
The loss is all driven by depreciation and write down of right to use ie a $68m assets they built with government grants and a JV partner monies, some from the AFL and some of their own.
Its not a cash loss. They had $3.7m cash inflow from normal operations and their pre depreciation profit was $684k.
In 2019 they had a $0 asset for the Royal Hall of Industries and $0 for the Right to use that asset under a lease and a $0 lease liability.
In 2024 they ended the year - after several years construction with a $50m building, $12m of furniture and equipment in that building and $6m of leasehold improvements ie stuff that's not considered part of the structure of the building, and under accounting rules had to book a $41.7m right to use assets and a matching lease liability on a building which they have a 29 year lease on, and have to pay a lease amount on.
So that $50m is written off over 29 years, the $12m furniture and equipment in that building over and $6m of leasehold improvements over 3 to 10 years and the Right to use asset is written off over 29 years.
The depreciation and amortisation expense of $3,721,608 is about 95% related to a new home, which the swans paid bugger all for to build and fitted out,
and the depreciation of the right to use asset is $1,621,754 an accounting book entry to reflect the decrease in how much longer the lease has to run.
So would you rather have a new $68m home, 90%+ paid for by others, get full use of it for 29 years and have to bear the burden of wearing $5.3m of depreciation and amortisation costs in the first decade then it reduces closer to $3.5m per year or say, no I don't need a new home with great facilities and opportunity to drive new cash revenue streams, because I don't want those non cash accounting expenses to be shown in my books??
I know which one I would choose.
The Swans are doing just fine.
Good news then thanks for the analysis. I was just a bit shocked to see they only earnt 600k initially off the back of the near perfect on field year, then when I saw it was actually a 4 mill loss, was even more shocked.
I thought the royal hall stuff was finished a couple of years back, but glad to hear they're in a solid financial position, as they should be, being the biggest sporting club in the biggest state in the country. Hopefully now they have a big launch pad to be a financial powerhouse in the AFL, like your Collingwood and west coast types.
They will never be that. Swans have massive latent support when people in Sydney are asked which AFL side do they support, but that will never turn into big $$$ that WCE make even when they are a poor side, and Collingwood, especially when they are flying.Hopefully now they have a big launch pad to be a financial powerhouse in the AFL, like your Collingwood and west coast types.
Ok so we have the exact revenue now, we should have articles from news.com.au, the Herald Sun, daily telegraph, the age, the smh, the guardian, channel 9 lauding the $1 billion revenue, like all the 'nrl is the number one sport, 700 mill profit' articles from these outlets right?
"The truth is, while the NRL do very well and are advancing, this may not strictly be true."
Lol! Not remotely true!
Re participation, a quick scan of the previous Ausplay by sports dashboards shows that 66K (over 20%) of the Rugby League participants also played touch football or tag
So you can't just add them together.
....to the extent that calling someone a rugby league participant who plays mid week touch football in Melbourne completely ignorant of its relationship to rugby league
meh its a way of calling it out without being a clown about it to half my audience.
Touch Football literally carries NRL branding and board members. And Oztag is about to undertake a similar alignment.
Well you can. Ive done it above, while also identifying the separate figures.
Its unlikely they are unaware given the current relationship and brandin
That's the furthest thing from the truth. Crowd numbers, merch numbers and membership numbers pale in comparison to the money the broadcasters put into the game. Without ratings and the money that the broadcasters put into the game, there would be plenty of clubs who would struggle to survive. A few even from Victoria.Ratings put the legends game as the biggest game of the season so far
Means bugger all compared to crowds merch and memberships
Shouldn't that make the block worth more than the AFL and NRL?That's the furthest thing from the truth. Crowd numbers, merch numbers and membership numbers pale in comparison to the money the broadcasters put into the game. Without ratings and the money that the broadcasters put into the game, there would be plenty of clubs who would struggle to survive. A few even from Victoria.