Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2025 Trade & List Management Thread

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Official FA Moves/Trades
Player/PicksOriginal Team
Receiving Team​
FA /Trade?
Tom De KoningCarltonSt KildaRFA
Jack SilvagniCarltonSt KildaUFA
Jacob WehrGWSPort AdelaideUFA
Sam DraperEssendonBrisbaneUFA
Oscar AllenWest CoastBrisbaneRFA
Charlie SpargoMelbourneNorth MelbourneUFA

Buku Khamis - requests a trade to Carlton
Wade Derksen - requests a trade to Melbourne
Liam Ryan - requests a trade to St Kilda
Leek Aleer - requests a trade to St Kilda
Campbell Chesser - requests a trade to Carlton
Will Brodie - requests a trade to Port Adelaide
Liam Reidy - requests a trade to Carlton
Sam Flanders - has requested a trade/explore options
 
Last edited:
Here's our big chance to finally land a big fish like Charlie Spargo from Melbourne. Welcome home Charlie....
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

It depends on what the end point is that they are trying to get to.

If it is a cleaner draft then they need to remove Academy access.

If it is equalising access to F/Ss then reduce the amount of games played required.

what it really depends on is what way the AFL want their thumb on the scales.


This is not limited to F/Ss.

The points arrangement is broken. It was arguably fairer in how we had to pay for Luke McDonald.

You could make it "fairer" by making clubs pay for a nominated selection with a pick that can be no more than 15 picks from the nomination.

Gold Coast have top potential top 5 picks this year. If they get nominated at picks 2&3 under the above the cheapest they could get them would be with picks 17 and 18. We have live trading so I don't see an impediment to that.

It would end the pay for them with 5 picks spread across the 20s and 30s.

I doubt the AFL have any real interest in fair by the way.
Yeah it just has to be paid with higher picks as King Corey said.
Within 10 picks seems correct with no discount - don’t know why the discount was in to start with.
 
I do hope in the F/S conversation someone is pushing for a 'deflator' - that's to say, if future F/S picks are going to be more heavily discounted (or even abolished), that applies to F/S players who are already in the system. So for example, Collingwood with Moore, 2 X Daicos have to give up draft points into the future for the benefit they already have.

Just sayin' - equalisation, and all that
 

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I do hope in the F/S conversation someone is pushing for a 'deflator' - that's to say, if future F/S picks are going to be more heavily discounted (or even abolished), that applies to F/S players who are already in the system. So for example, Collingwood with Moore, 2 X Daicos have to give up draft points into the future for the benefit they already have.

Just sayin' - equalisation, and all that
can Geelong be charged back-rent for the 18 years they had with Tom Hawkins at the pick 41 they paid for him?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top