You started your post comparing a possible trading down our pick 4 with us trading our 2nd round pick to North.
How did that work out for North? Who actually traded their 1st round pick. Exactly my point, you shouldn't trade down your top picks because it's foolish.
2ndly we aren't getting pick 5 & 6 from Essendon so using that as an example is a waste of time and pure fantasy.
Club has 2 very high picks, it's just doesn't make sense to trade down at all.
My question was is our trade with North some clever trade or trickery.
It's not, these are simple trades that teams make.
I posted several other trades of clubs trading down.
And the 5 and 6 scenarioo was simply to show you, that trading down makes perfect sense at the correct price - I never said that is what it would cost, as that is obviously an outlandish trade that we would obviously accept. Hence, showing that "trading down picks is foolish" is a foolish statement, as you do it, if the offer is good.
Happened successfully many of times - Including the Brisbane lions who traded down from Taranto at 2, to McCluggage at 3 and Berry at 16, who then went on to make 3 grand finals in a row.
It makes perfect sense to trade down, if we want to target another player, or address 2 areas of need.





