Scorpus
Moderator
- Apr 16, 2014
- 67,813
- 183,802
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I have this feeling Filthy will be our best and most important player within 12 months.Pretty strong argument for Filthy to be #1 for the next few years.
You just don't get forwards with his height, strength, agility, skill levels. Generational talent.
And he's still young. Imagine him getting even better.
If he does that, there is no way he would not be our, if not the league's top player. He is definitely capable of it.2024 he was injured/suspended for too many games.
2025 we all know what happened.
He plays lots of games at an AA level in a season, he just needs to... do that for a whole season.
he already is IMOI have this feeling Filthy will be our best and most important player within 12 months.
Our success will depend on him performance
he already is IMO
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Both. Essendon's player development failures go back a long way before Scott's appointment, but you rightly point out that Scott has issues in addition to the club's.Essendon or Brad Scott?
He didn’t exactly have a great record with developing draft picks at North Melbourne either.
yep Hobbs similar to Berry, he's not really going to move the dial for Crows (I think Berry is better).I think that traditional inside mid that can't do anything else is dying out - very similar to Berry with us
Both. Essendon's player development failures go back a long way before Scott's appointment, but you rightly point out that Scott has issues in addition to the club's.
Pretty strong argument for Filthy to be #1 for the next few years.
You just don't get forwards with his height, strength, agility, skill levels. Generational talent.
And he's still young. Imagine him getting even better.
Both. Essendon's player development failures go back a long way before Scott's appointment, but you rightly point out that Scott has issues in addition to the club's.
We currently have 3x senior, 1x Cat A and 1x Cat B rookie positions available.Out of interest can someone tell me how many list spots are available assuming we get Ah Chee
Don't we only have 1 cat B out of 3? Or is there someone I've forgotten??We currently have 3x senior, 1x Cat A and 1x Cat B rookie positions available.
Assuming we get Ah Chee in the PSD, we will need to move (delist & re-draft) one player from the senior list to the rookie list, in order to achieve the AFL's mandatory 3x ND selections. This would leave us with 3x senior and 1x Cat B rookie position available.
It is unlikely that we will fill our Cat B rookie list. We've added Cotton, but delisted Gallagher. There do not appear to be any other Cat B signings likely this year.
You are partially correct. We only have 1x Cat B rookie (Cotton), so you are correct there. Clubs are only allowed 2x Cat B rookies in total, which is where you are incorrect.Don't we only have 1 cat B out of 3? Or is there someone I've forgotten??
Thank you. It seems that maybe the AFL website is out of date, compared to their actual rules?You are partially correct. We only have 1x Cat B rookie (Cotton), so you are correct there. Clubs are only allowed 2x Cat B rookies in total, which is where you are incorrect.
AFL List sizes are specified in Appendix 1 of the AFL Rules document (attached). You can find them on page 187.
The reverse is equally likely to be true. We know for a fact that the AFL has rules which are not specified in the publicly available policy documents. The AFL has a history of failing to keep their publicly available documents up to date - their internal documents (available to the clubs) are well maintained, but they seemingly don't give a flying **** about the general public.Thank you. It seems that maybe the AFL website is out of date, compared to their actual rules?
AFl cut list sizes during covid cat B list reduced from 3 to 2, but there is talk that there will be an indigenous only rookie allowed to be added, maybe they will finalise this before the draft???
View attachment 2461974
Or the total number stays the same and more are just added to the rookie list.AFl cut list sizes during covid cat B list reduced from 3 to 2, but there is talk that there will be an indigenous only rookie allowed to be added, maybe they will finalise this before the draft???
View attachment 2461974
The draft is now less than a month away (19-20 November). It's unlikely the AFL would make such a significant change this close to the event. It's more likely that this rule change would be introduced in 2026.AFl cut list sizes during covid cat B list reduced from 3 to 2, but there is talk that there will be an indigenous only rookie allowed to be added, maybe they will finalise this before the draft???
View attachment 2461974
Which option suits Geelong best?The draft is now less than a month away (19-20 November). It's unlikely the AFL would make such a significant change this close to the event. It's more likely that this rule change would be introduced in 2026.
Then again, this is the AFL we're talking about, so normally assumed competence standards for management are irrelevant. Anything is possible...
I guess "putting it all together" is one of those skills you need to actually be the best, rather than the most talented that isn't quite the best.If he does that, there is no way he would not be our, if not the league's top player. He is definitely capable of it.
since 94. i am foundation gold. i get to as many home games as I can. I got to almost all this year plus all Vic games of course. I just missed the north, wc and hawks (final) this year.You live in Melbourne?
I like the idea of the indigenous only rookie.AFl cut list sizes during covid cat B list reduced from 3 to 2, but there is talk that there will be an indigenous only rookie allowed to be added, maybe they will finalise this before the draft???
View attachment 2461974
Good in theoryI like the idea of the indigenous only rookie.
They changed the minimum first round picks used in so many years, something clubs plan around over several years, half way through trade week. So don’t be surprised if they make the announcement the day of the draft.The draft is now less than a month away (19-20 November). It's unlikely the AFL would make such a significant change this close to the event. It's more likely that this rule change would be introduced in 2026.
Then again, this is the AFL we're talking about, so normally assumed competence standards for management are irrelevant. Anything is possible...