based on those finals it's difficult to pin point one facet we should be working on as everything broke down. When we did take risks it was so poorly executed.Thanks again for the report
Really interested in this
Obviously teams want to play clean, precise football. However against top teams especially in September this isn't always possible
I heard Mark Williams speak once and he said that training had to be messy. There needed to be pressure that created errors because that's what games were like. If the ball was moving beautifully, player to player, never hitting the ground at training then that was bad because finals are never like that.
I wonder if:
1) We will use these activities to identify the weaker disposers of the ball and not select them (I have my doubts here)
2) Will players choose safe options (short kicks, backwards, zero hurt factor) so that they don't risk turnover
Other clubs seem to be shying away from worrying about mistakes or things that might go wrong (Chris Fagan: "Run towards the fire"). They accept some errors will occur, take the game on anyway, no fear
Are we going the wrong way by trying to be precise and neat?
It felt like we moved towards a turnover-reduction-focus as last season wore on. The high scoring, free flowing football that suited our forward line but risked being scored against was reeled in. We became more careful and I'm not sure it played to our strengths.
Biggest area I think we need to work on is midfield structure. Not getting first hands on the ball and then allowing oppo to flick the ball around and get it on the outside to a player in a better position with ease. On the other hand when we did get hands on it we did the opposite - dump kick the ball under pressure or give the ball to a team mate in the same or worse position (or ROB).
A lot gets made of our talent in the midfield and while I agree we lack another top line mid, i think this analysis is a bit lazy and the bigger problem is coaching and structure.




