- Joined
- Apr 8, 2010
- Posts
- 7,703
- Reaction score
- 32,464
- Location
- South Adelaide
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- South Adelaide Panthers
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 9
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Rawlings.
Meh. I'm pretty comfortable with us not going too early with the last few players on our list. In all honesty it was a good move by Maley anyway - his papers were stamped with us not long after Trembath hit the ice on his 3rd game IMO.Rawlings.
People management level - expert.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Yep. It's just not that uncommon if you are in that last 5 or so spots on the list. Personally I would much prefer larger list sizes and more ability to keep players on for development, redundancy, VFL development and simple senior depth in key positions rather than unready 18 year olds. But that's not what the AFL wants.Fair play to Maley for finding himself a new club.
But there would be players across all 18 clubs in limbo that time of year.
You should be able to elevate a certain amount of players from your VFL squad in to a ‘practice squad’ who are eligible to play if selected.Yep. It's just not that uncommon if you are in that last 5 or so spots on the list. Personally I would much prefer larger list sizes and more ability to keep players on for development, redundancy, VFL development and simple senior depth in key positions rather than unready 18 year olds. But that's not what the AFL wants.
We could call them 'rookie listed' or something.You should be able to elevate a certain amount of players from your VFL squad in to a ‘practice squad’ who are eligible to play if selected.
I, in general, think list sizes should be enough to cover both AFL and VFL and go back to a genuine reserves competition (would kill the current VFL though).Yep. It's just not that uncommon if you are in that last 5 or so spots on the list. Personally I would much prefer larger list sizes and more ability to keep players on for development, redundancy, VFL development and simple senior depth in key positions rather than unready 18 year olds. But that's not what the AFL wants.
Agree. We surely have to be getting close to this point a 19 and presumably inevitably a 20 team competition should surely be big enough to fully run and fund a genuine second league. What that would mean for state comps though is a huge problem, more so outside Victoria and in SA / WA I'd say.I, in general, think list sizes should be enough to cover both AFL and VFL and go back to a genuine reserves competition (would kill the current VFL though).
You should be able to elevate a certain amount of players from your VFL squad in to a ‘practice squad’ who are eligible to play if selected.
Why is it weird? It’s an interview.Bit weird of Finnbar to make a comment like that publicly, regardless of whether Brady actually slighted him or not.
You should be able to elevate a certain amount of players from your VFL squad in to a ‘practice squad’ who are eligible to play if selected.
Souup you were all over him pre-draft, yes? Curtis & Ford from memory?
Brave of Josh Jenkins to state that a player that should have been selected in the AA squad for 2025 can be an all australian.
I don’t actually know myself, but what was the context? Were they asking for bold predictions or perhaps certainties or what?Brave of Josh Jenkins to state that a player that should have been selected in the AA squad for 2025 can be an all australian.
Sounds like he wanted a trade and is using that to justify it.Bit weird of Finnbar to make a comment like that publicly, regardless of whether Brady actually slighted him or not.
Not necessarily? Maybe he really wanted to stay, but we hadn't committed to him, so he acted on approaches elsewhere. I don't have an issue with it. I would have preferred we retained him as I reckon he has enough there to work with to become something, but if we didn't put a contract in front of him and someone else did (and they are good team with good prospects), then good for him.Sounds like he wanted a trade and is using that to justify it.
At the same time if he'd kicked that goal against * and we'd won that game as result we'd have signed him before the season ended.
"Wearing a prison green sweatshirt, Silvagni beamed into the courtroom seated in a white-walled room. His parents, who supported him throughout the trial, did not attend"Judge has ruled that Tom Silvagni can now publicly be named as the offender in the high profile rape case, as he has now been sentenced.
Said he has to deal with the repercussions of his actions at some point, denying an extension of the suppression order.
Nah. Nothing to do with anyone but Tom.Geewhiz SOS looked like a shell of a man… Perhaps he should have been a better father.
