Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Personally, I just think he's drastically overrated. I don't think he's that good of a player.
It's my opinion.
I just don't get the hype.
If the very few nay sayers have to put up with the hundreds believing the sun shines out of Max Kings hole, and that he can do no wrong. Then the hordes can deal with the three or four of us that don't share that view.
When he starts kicking the 70-80 goals a season much touted on here, I'm sure we doubters will come around.
That's it.![]()
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
.That's your genius Dr. Spaceman.
No room for Wanga?1. Nas
2. Naz
3. NWM
I would rate King more highly if he got rid of the T-Rex dinosaur armsI dont rate King that highly, but think it is unreasonable to be making up bullshit about him being miles off when anyone at training can see his progress week by week.
Say you dont rate him, say in your view he isn't much good, fair enough, but don't make up bullshit, like that bloke the other day
I think I made my point pretty clear that it was a generalisation about the way people talk about King on here.where did he attack him ?
Just a different opinion is how it reads
I don’t agree with this sentiment, absolutely has a lot to do with football culture in general wherein there is a lot of violence perpetrated towards women.Why are people commenting on this matter, it has absolutely NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with St Kilda FC, leave his mother, father, brothers alone, they'll be hurting enough without Saints supporters joining the media in the pile-on, disgusting as far as I'm concerned![]()
Agree it's a difficult question i raise but it does get you thinking!And isn’t that great?
Rewind even 2 years - wasn’t nearly as difficult a decision.
I still can’t even decide who to change my avatar to let alone pick 3 players.
NAS has to be standout as #1 not only because of the player he is, but because of the impact he has had on the entire club by staying. This pre-season draft/trade period would not have been half as successful without that. More than anything he’s really given us hope and helped make the club relevant again. ( Hope he doesn’t bankrupt us though!)
I do love Hally. Been a sensational pick up. Stocker has been inspirational with what he’s been through, and I really respect his choice to just take a year by year contract. And Wood - well, nothing I need to add.
As I’ve said before, it’s like trying to pick your favourite child.
I can’t.
Boxy and Banfield are both tremendous prospects, one picked at 45 and the other 41...A couple of Dalrymple diamonds in the rough..I’ve got a really good feeling Boxshall is going to become a fan favourite
Watching training consistently this preseason I'd have Jack Carroll in that back flank spot.I want to talk about Travaglia.
He needs to be a lock for Back Flank, learning from Sincs and rotating through the midfield with NAS/Sincs- what better role models for the young man to find his feet at AFL and build confidence.
Second to Trav is Tauru- these two were a dominant backline combination for Victoria in the U18s. He needs to have first crack at a backline position to learn from Wilkie- when to defend, when to attack.
Pump some games into these two lads. T&T!
Jack is not on a million dollars a year FFS.Hmmm I don't agree tbh. I think the million dollars a year may have something to do with it.
Okay 850 then. I wouldn’t pay him more than 450. Save the money for Sharman, Pou, Wilson, Baily or any other free agent.Jack is not on a million dollars a year FFS.
Why make stuff like that up?
Personally, I just think he's drastically overrated. I don't think he's that good of a player.
It's my opinion.
I just don't get the hype.
If the very few nay sayers have to put up with the hundreds believing the sun shines out of Max Kings hole, and that he can do no wrong. Then the hordes can deal with the three or four of us that don't share that view.
When he starts kicking the 70-80 goals a season much touted on here, I'm sure we doubters will come around.
That's it.![]()
So because you don’t think he is as good as mentioned by others, you think it’s fair to attack the guys body/work ethic/contract etc?
Think it is possible we improve significantly but still only finish 9 or 10. There are just a lot of good teams.After the ladder predictor and no doubt I’ll be way off.
1-Brisbane
2-Hawthorn
3-Adelaide
4-Fremantle
5-Gold Coast
6-Geelong
7-Sydney
8-GWS
9-Port Adelaide
10-St Kilda
11-Western Bulldogs
12-Collingwood
13-Carlton
14-North Melbourne
15-Essendon
16-Melbourne
17-Richmond
18-West Coast Eagles
I don’t rate Port Adelaide at all no idea how I tipped them to 9th.
Sydney was higher than I expected.
Didn’t think I would have the dogs and pies that low.
I thought I would’ve had the Suns in the top 4 and I thought I’d rate the hawks and crows lower.
Interesting exercise.
He would not have come for that. We'd be all in on Leek Aleer and JSOS would most probably be a Bulldog.Okay 850 then. I wouldn’t pay him more than 450. Save the money for Sharman, Pou, Wilson, Baily or any other free agent.
Went over to WCE board and respectively asked what they thought his weaknesses were.Boxy and Banfield are both tremendous prospects, one picked at 45 and the other 41...A couple of Dalrymple diamonds in the rough..
Each to their own I guess. Some people will always complain. I had more issues with Billings getting paid top dollar for little impact 95% of the games he played.So because you don’t think he is as good as mentioned by others, you think it’s fair to attack the guys body/work ethic/contract etc?
That’s what the point of my post was. It’s an incredibly weird thing be it your don’t rate him or as others have said they believed he was the anointed one.
Like we had posts claiming he couldn’t even lift a weight and then the club releases a few images of him and he looks like he has arms and legs as thick as tree branches.
If we were during the season and he wasn’t performing. Fair game. But that’s not what is occurring.
To me Banfield is a hybrid mid, can play inside, outside. I’m not sure he is a good wing, as speed and precise kicking is probably not his strength.Went over to WCE board and respectively asked what they thought his weaknesses were.
They were more of the mind that while he is a good physical speciman, he was a bit vanilla and lacks a bit of pace. They thought the list needs were better suited to the NGA they matched at pick 39.
So no glaring weakness a bit one paced and they thought he got sloppy under pressure. Fair enough.
Personally think they will regret their decision, I dont think he is one paced or vanilla, however hard to see at preseason.
Get some development into him and he coyld be an absolute steal in my opinion.
I agree with them. I think Banfield can be a really good winger but I think his ceiling is limited going off his U18s performances - I don't see much chance of him becoming an A-grade inside mid given his average foot skills and lack of paceWent over to WCE board and respectively asked what they thought his weaknesses were.
They were more of the mind that while he is a good physical speciman, he was a bit vanilla and lacks a bit of pace. They thought the list needs were better suited to the NGA they matched at pick 39.
So no glaring weakness a bit one paced and they thought he got sloppy under pressure. Fair enough.
Personally think they will regret their decision, I dont think he is one paced or vanilla, however hard to see at preseason.
Get some development into him and he coyld be an absolute steal in my opinion.
He was very influential in match sim yesterday...He's not quick but definitely covers the ground well, is courageous, great one grab mark and runs all day!Went over to WCE board and respectively asked what they thought his weaknesses were.
They were more of the mind that while he is a good physical speciman, he was a bit vanilla and lacks a bit of pace. They thought the list needs were better suited to the NGA they matched at pick 39.
So no glaring weakness a bit one paced and they thought he got sloppy under pressure. Fair enough.
Personally think they will regret their decision, I dont think he is one paced or vanilla, however hard to see at preseason.
Get some development into him and he coyld be an absolute steal in my opinion.