- Joined
- Feb 9, 2011
- Posts
- 6,209
- Reaction score
- 7,026
- Location
- If I'm online I'm at work!
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Boston CelticsRedSoxBruins
But the point is the lack of development. No player drafted would be the same player minus the development they've gotten over the journey.One of the key tenets that clubs with academies as well as the AFL use as their reasoning for their existence is that northern academies increase participation and awareness in Northern states. I think we can all be willing to accept that premise.
But where I think a tweak must be made is regarding F/S and academy dual qualifying players. They should be F/S eligible only as they aren't actively increasing participation and awareness of AFL. They are from an AFL family so are indoctrinated in the sport from a young age so the key tenet of academy existence really shouldn't apply.
It still doesn't sit right seeing Blakey at the Swans. He should be a Kangaroo like his dad. And Hodge should be Hawthorn's to exclusively select.
Surely better development and exposure creates a better player at the point of the draft???
Just need to make sure teams are paying the right price for the talent they're getting.
Last edited:






