AvP Werewolf II - Whoever wins, Zerg loses. Game Over. Colonial Marines win!

[Pie 4 Life]

Y

Yeah but we’re at 9 now so the amulet doesn’t matter any more. Free to kill and lynch whomever.

Well I don't know what I can do, the only one I've got left to use is WAbulldog lol. Then they go and target someone could be watch, kill or track tbh.

If eth had doused everyone remaining then yeah arsonist is the play, but even statistically it's not likely given we're down to nine so only having one or two doused max is the most realistic. That's what makes me feel like NI is the better go today.

 

[Pie 4 Life]

If we feel Eth is the arsonist, voting them is still the safest option. Would 100% guarantee a village win.

If they’re the arsonist and we leave them alive, there’s the potential we get double crossed given he’s doused two good, would just need to douse one more and cats will win.

Evil has to remove the arsonist to win.

 

[Shueygod]

Evil has to remove the arsonist to win.

Right but Ethdog is suggesting I kill him tonight if he makes it through the lynch.

 

[eth-dog]

If we feel Eth is the arsonist, voting them is still the safest option. Would 100% guarantee a village win.

If they’re the arsonist and we leave them alive, there’s the potential we get double crossed given he’s doused two good, would just need to douse one more and cats will win.

Where's this second good you're getting from? I told you I've doused two dead people (Raz and 3KZ), you (one of two vigilante claims), WAB (who is either a grunt or evil) and MP (who you also know is evil).

Are you mistaking P4L for 3KZ?

 

[Shueygod]

How has it taken me/us til today to realise Arsonist isn’t even NI. First time I’ve read the role

 

[Shueygod]

Where's this second good you're getting from? I told you I've doused two dead people (Raz and 3KZ), you (one of two vigilante claims), WAB (who is either a grunt or evil) and MP (who you also know is evil).

Are you mistaking P4L for 3KZ?

I’m very confident WAB is good.

 

[eth-dog]

I’m very confident WAB is good.

He's a 1/3 chance of being good. You and Reap have both claimed vig though.

 

[Shueygod]

Eth-dog: Arsonist
MP - Alpha
Cats - Queen
The_Reaper - Beserker

Lynch Eth, Maj targets Reaper (no retaliation kill), I target Cats (just in case Reaper was playing funny buggers - would be a retaliation kill).
Would be likely 3 good - 2 evil left

Alternatively if we’re going to take Eth at his word (dousing MP), we’d be better off lynching Cats today. I kill Wth, MP dies tonight to the ignite, Maj hits the Reaper, Village win a day early.

 

[MP_]

Time for a famous avicii song

Wake me up when it’s all over

 

[Shueygod]

He's a 1/3 chance of being good. You and Reap have both claimed vig though.

Reaper is 100% evil, wouldn’t claim Vig as a grunt.

 

[Shueygod]

When Zerg first said Cats was NI, I assumed it was information from one of the last two nights. But predators have targeted P4L both of those nights, which means they learnt it on N2 or N3.

Why would they not get Ocha to say something , predators have absolutely had a mare.

Lots of lazy votes on me

I’m going to vote cats for no reason other than I have a gut feeling they are sus ZergMinion

Where is cats_09 , they’ve been pretty quiet. Some interesting information is coming out with maj claiming joat and jhf looking dodgy and ocha under the pump.

These support that though.

 

[Shueygod]

Alright then Village:

Lynch Cats, I’ll kill Eth, Maj kill the Reaper, MP either dies in the ignition or you guys lynch him tomorrow.

 

[Shueygod]

Cats_09 thanks ZergMinion

 

[The Majestic]

Ah actually a question for you The Majestic who’d you give the amulet to?

I never got it

 

[Pie 4 Life]

I’m very confident WAB is good.

My reading on WAB early days was they didn't visit anyone on that night (two nights back). We can take it with a grain of salt given my role is reliable as a chocolate kettle, but because 3KZ flipped as a grunt, I'm of the belief it is a correct reading.

 

[Pie 4 Life]

Alright then Village:

Lynch Cats, I’ll kill Eth, Maj kill the Reaper, MP either dies in the ignition or you guys lynch him tomorrow.

One switch I'd do is you kill The Reaper and The Majestic kills Eth. That way if you are diddling the village, if The Reaper is the vig then we're not getting a good role to kill another good role.

I've played this game long enough to trust no one until it's 100% certain.

 

[Pie 4 Life]

Happy with the Cats_09 vote as we all agree they seem to be night immune.

ZergMinion

 

[Pie 4 Life]

Happy with the Cats_09 vote as we all agree they seem to be night immune.

ZergMinion

The way I had to restrain all my power from editing after missing bolding the 'C' lol.

Cats_09 ZergMinion

 

[Shueygod]

One switch I'd do is you kill The Reaper and The Majestic kills Eth. That way if you are diddling the village, if The Reaper is the vig then we're not getting a good role to kill another good role.

I've played this game long enough to trust no one until it's 100% certain.

True, true. Main benefit of Maj killing the reaper was no revenge kill, but I’ll be dying regardless. Happy to do this.

 

[WAbulldog]

Cats it is then ZergMinion

 

[eth-dog]

Reaper is 100% evil, wouldn’t claim Vig as a grunt.

Reaper is either evil or vig. As are you. MP is evil. WAB and cats are both 50/50 chances of being evil or grunt. The fact you keep pushing the "WAB is good" rhetoric even though that's not confirmed puts doubt on your claim.

My dying overnight will put the game to bed for the village but you oddly keep pushing for me to be lynched instead.

Alright then Village:

Lynch Cats, I’ll kill Eth, Maj kill the Reaper, MP either dies in the ignition or you guys lynch him tomorrow.

Another strange one. If you're so sure Reap is evil, why would you not push for his lynch? It's the only way to 100% verify your Vig claim. Cats is a 50% chance of being evil alongside WAB. MP is either evil or Arsonist alongside me, and MP's claim was dependant on getting the amulet overnight. One of you or Reap is Vig, the other is evil. One of WAB or cats is a grunt, the other is evil.

Why would you go for an unknown, instead of the person you counter-claimed? Why would you be so strident in asserting WAB is a grunt and cats is evil?

 

[eth-dog]

Happy with the Cats_09 vote as we all agree they seem to be night immune.

ZergMinion

I'm still 50/50 on him and WAB. As I am on Reap and SG. His pushing that WAB is definitely good makes me certain that they're either both good or both evil and allied.

The only one who is undeniably evil is MP, as we've worked out his claim was so he could steal the amulet. After that, you have 4 roles, Maj can kill me and watch WAB, cats and SG burn, and then if SG is telling the truth he can kill Reap and the village win.

 

[Shueygod]

Another strange one. If you're so sure Reap is evil, why would you not push for his lynch? It's the only way to 100% verify your Vig claim. Cats is a 50% chance of being evil alongside WAB. MP is either evil or Arsonist alongside me, and MP's claim was dependant on getting the amulet overnight. One of you or Reap is Vig, the other is evil. One of WAB or cats is a grunt, the other is evil.

Why would you go for an unknown, instead of the person you counter-claimed? Why would you be so strident in asserting WAB is a grunt and cats is evil?

Because Reap is the Beserker, the only role good can kill tonight.

WAB confirmed good with the P4L claim just then (as well as giving the amulet to KT earlier).

 

[cats_09]

The way I had to restrain all my power from editing after missing bolding the 'C' lol.

Cats_09 ZergMinion

Go one

Edit it

 

[cats_09]

Lynch me and it's a step closer to the Arsonist winning the game - are we sure that's the way we want to role