Remove this Banner Ad

Religion Folau

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I get that you are not arguing for what Folau said. The problem he is going to have is to how his contact is worded. I am certain there would be something in there about his social media activity and not bringing his sport into disrepute. He also has history which won't help his cause. You can have your religious beliefs without publicly vilifying those who your beliefs allegedly allow you to alienate.

He is not only a sanctimonious prick, he is also quite clearly a moron given the very public warning he was given last time.

I disagree. I would say he will be earning much better money in France or Japan in a few months time.
 
Yeah, the call to jihad, calling for people to drive cars into crowds in the name of Islam, you're fine with that?

How do you not get the difference. Inciting violence is actually a crime and against the law.

If someone tweets that they believe that a thief's hand should be cut off as punishment.It is just not the same thing. I have tweeted about 17 reasons we should bring back capital punishment. Number 1 are people who are loud on early morning trains .
 
Last edited:
Peter Fitzsimons made an excellent point on C9 yesterday. If I wore an "All Gays Are Going To Hell" t-shirt to work, it is reasonable to expect that I would get the sack.

Well, homophobe Folau did much the same thing

Ah bullshit, he did nothing of the sort. Bandanna Man never got anything right and he hasn't opened his account here.

Folau didn't single out homosexuals for special treatment, he simply included them among a list of sinners as defined by his religion. And not even at the top.

If the Bible is the word of God, then God says homosexuals are sinners. Take it up with him/her.
 
Peter Fitzsimons made an excellent point on C9 yesterday. If I wore an "All Gays Are Going To Hell" t-shirt to work, it is reasonable to expect that I would get the sack.

Well, homophobe Folau did much the same thing, only he spread his message of hate to many, many more people who have access to his social media. Yes, he is entitled to his beliefs. No, he is not entitled to publicly demonise people beacuse of who they are.

The Christians will have you believe that theirs is an accepting and peaceful religion. That is, until they can get involved in a war against other religions, a good old fashioned paedophile ring or some public condemnation of those who are different. Then they go all fire and brimstone. What charitable, non-judgemental people they are.

He is a hypocrite too though . He was all for Free speech when Mundine made his comments on 9/11 and could not believe the outrage over the comments

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/b...3/news-story/8b17839369ecc1ccbb58eccaa9fb73b6
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Ah bullshit, he did nothing of the sort. Bandanna Man never got anything right and he hasn't opened his account here.

Folau didn't single out homosexuals for special treatment, he simply included them among a list of sinners as defined by his religion. And not even at the top.

If the Bible is the word of God, then God says homosexuals are sinners. Take it up with him/her.


You know I would but I have a few issues with Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy to address first.
 
bloody religion ...not worth the paper its written on.....whole world would be a much better place without it....cause,s nothing but trouble...that's my take on it all !!!!!
 
Why would someone believe something they did not think was true?
When you say I believe this is does not say to the other person you are therefore wrong in your belief. It is an expression of what you believe and not commentary on what others believe.
Issy stated it as fact taking that aspect out, you are all going to hell . No consideration given for that persons belief.
 
Evidence from man that's my point have you done the same experiment and got same result hawkings and Darwin both belived different things who do I belive

You should definitely believe in a book written by 66 different men who spoke different languages over hundreds, if not thousands of years and has been translated quite literally thousands of times subsequently.

You should also believe a man named Methuselah lived until he was 969 years old and that some guy called Jonah lived inside a giant fish for three days and three nights.

Plus, you should believe that all homosexuals are going to Hell and that the growing of two different crops in the same field is a capital offence.
 
Why not science has billions of authors still trying to come to same conclusion

Many people lived to an old age until ad only then did no man live past 135 except a few instances

And I'm worthy of hell to its only Gods grace and forgiveness that saves me am do I deserve heaven heck no

I know you will disagree and that's fine but I'd rather believe that there is hope for eternity rather then belive all we do is for nothing

Any way it's irrelevant what I think or say im no one special in a sinner who needed saving
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Is there an issue when an athiest does same thing of course not

There is a world of difference between someone saying "show me evidence for your belief" versus "Repent or burn in hell".

Feel free to show me posts from an atheist saying "You must be an atheist or you are evil". There might be a handful and I'd argue that they are wrong. As I (and many others) have said through the thread, people are free to believe whatever they want.
 
There is a world of difference between someone saying "show me evidence for your belief" versus "Repent or burn in hell".

Feel free to show me posts from an atheist saying "You must be an atheist or you are evil". There might be a handful and I'd argue that they are wrong. As I (and many others) have said through the thread, people are free to believe whatever they want.
The difference is we Christians don't get offended call us whatever do what ever you want to us say what you want about us it's fine we know that none of you ever offer offence so why take it and for that I thank athiest for being much bigger people that I could ever be
 
The difference is we Christians don't get offended call us whatever do what ever you want to us say what you want about us it's fine we know that none of you ever offer offence so why take it and for that I thank athiest for being much bigger people that I could ever be

1. What language are you trying to speak?
2. Some high profile Christians took some pretty serious offence to Pell being called a pedophile despite what the court found.
 
The only reason he came to AF was the silly money he was offered to come.
He had no interest in being a decent player. For him it was always about the money.
When he left GWS he could have gone back to Rugby League, but instead chose to play Rugby union as they offered more money. If and when he's sacked he will have offers to play other sports perhaps and and he he does chose to keep playing it will purely for the money. Purely for the team/sport that offers him most money.

Perhaps he can play some mixed netball with his wife, who stood by her man and supported his comments on social media. I haven't seen anything about what the Silver Ferns might have to say about that.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Still faith your faith is in man and science takes more faith to believe in no God then a God you have faith in 2 things
Evidence from man that's my point have you done the same experiment and got same result hawkings and Darwin both belived different things who do I belive
Why not science has billions of authors still trying to come to same conclusion

Many people lived to an old age until ad only then did no man live past 135 except a few instances

And I'm worthy of hell to its only Gods grace and forgiveness that saves me am do I deserve heaven heck no

I know you will disagree and that's fine but I'd rather believe that there is hope for eternity rather then belive all we do is for nothing

Any way it's irrelevant what I think or say im no one special in a sinner who needed saving
What caused you to lose faith in punctuation?
 
Can’t shake the feeling that some people in this thread may have criticised Adam Goodes in the past for bringing politics into football....

......but are now defending the right of Folau to bring politics into football
 
Can’t shake the feeling that some people in this thread may have criticised Adam Goodes in the past for bringing politics into football....

......but are now defending the right of Folau to bring politics into football
Goodes had it thrust on him, he had no say.
He did not want his aboriginality to be an issue.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom