Remove this Banner Ad

Rumour Bluemour Discussion XLI

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

#BUMP from February


Re: 'Alleged' rumours resurfacing ...



Folks, this is the way things are here.

Posters are responsible for what they post. Moderators can not attest to the accuracy or otherwise of any rumour posted.

Moderators will intervene for a couple of reasons.

1. If a thread is threatening to be derailed because of a post.

2. If invested parties request the removal of material.

None of this draws a conclusion as to the accuracy or otherwise of the original post.

There is no need to further speculate. What will be will be.


Also, you need to remember that this thread like all parts of this forum is bound by the rules of poster conduct. If you want to express skepticism towards a rumour that's fine, but having a crack at posters who are contributors to this forum is simply not on and will be acted upon.

Simply put, don't be a dick.

Thanks all!
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

25, 26, 27 firsts and Hayward for Charlie, 31,42. The issue will be those future firsts will be most likely poor.

They will, cos Swans will be at pointy end. But it’s not a bad position to hold two+ first rounders for the next three drafts, right? Maybe the Swans win flags, they’re still good assets.
 
3 firsts..

Best one in a weak draft potentially swallowed.

Next year they'll be a top four team and will be used on Cody.

2027 draft heavily compromised.

Weak trade for a 2x Coleman medalistA
 

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

25, 26, 27 firsts and Hayward for Charlie, 31,42. The issue will be those future firsts will be most likely poor.
Correct. It’s amazing how few people actually work out what the pick actually is, and instead are captivated by the term “first round”.
Put them as numbers and see if you are as happy
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Rumour Bluemour Discussion XLI

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top