DEPORTATION
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Why does that bloke need more than 4 firearms? He sits up in the mountains, goes fishing and shoots the occasional deer.
Sure, banning guns is the solution. Personally, not fond of them, but really, is that the real problem?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Sure, banning guns is the solution. Personally, not fond of them, but really, is that the real problem?
But very dangerous aggressive deerWhy does that bloke need more than 4 firearms? He sits up in the mountains, goes fishing and shoots the occasional deer.
Sure, banning guns is the solution. Personally, not fond of them, but really, is that the real problem?
So an Albo aide reached out to visit someone in hospital, told to **** off.
So we know why he didn’t go to the funerals, no one wanted him. Why?
What a lot of rubbish! If I were in hospital in such a situation, I would also tell them to forget about it (in polite terms), because it would clearly be an attempt by them to make it political. Isn't that obvious?Because they are morons making it political. An if the person telling the aide to **** off and used that language it says more about them.
At least Sussan finally found the hospital, probably due to all funerals now completed.
And good to see you back posting on this political blog after sulking for 3 years.
So you think a mother who just lost her daughter ....or a husband that just lost his wife to terrorism, are Morons ???Because they are morons making it political. An if the person telling the aide to **** off and used that language it says more about them.
At least Sussan finally found the hospital, probably due to all funerals now completed.
And good to see you back posting on this political blog after sulking for 3 years.
100% .....although the language would be far more colourfulWhat a lot of rubbish! If I were in hospital in such a situation, I would also tell them to forget about it (in polite terms), because it would clearly be an attempt by them to make it political. Isn't that obvious?
Maybe.. just maybe George.. Some people prefer their privacy to remain in tact. Especially when they are lying in a bed wearing fxxk all other than an often very revealing hospital gown…So an Albo aide reached out to visit someone in hospital, told to **** off.
So we know why he didn’t go to the funerals, no one wanted him. Why?

It doesn't even require any thoughts about Govt inaction. As Clam says, it's just a natural reaction to any politician trying to gain positive vibes from their plight.So you think a mother who just lost her daughter ....or a husband that just lost his wife to terrorism, are Morons ???
I sincerely think, if it was you that was directly impacted, after perceived or otherwise Govt inaction .....you'd be in no mood for photo ops
asiatimes.com
Although the more I think about it..It doesn't even require any thoughts about Govt inaction. As Clam says, it's just a natural reaction to any politician trying to gain positive vibes from their plight.
also... and most importantlySo an Albo aide reached out to visit someone in hospital, told to **** off.
So we know why he didn’t go to the funerals, no one wanted him. Why?
>>>>![]()
Lol, what is sustainable about coal? You are funny.Meanwhile in Australia...
![]()
Made in China, Made in India – and powered by sustainable coal - Asia Times
The global energy debate is entering a reckoning it can no longer postpone. Not because activists have relented or governments have found consensus, butasiatimes.com
Made in China, Made in India – and powered by sustainable coal
As sovereignty, security and industrial capability retake center stage, clean coal will be key despite widespread Western reluctance
The global energy debate is entering a reckoning it can no longer postpone. Not because activists have relented or governments have found consensus, but because geopolitics, productivity energy and national security have forced reality back into the room.
For more than a decade, climate policy drifted away from the original intent of the Paris Agreement. What was designed as a framework grounded in flexibility, technological diversity and sovereign choice was gradually reshaped into something far narrower: a moral hierarchy of fuels and an industrial strategy by omission. Today, the world’s most competitive manufacturing economies are not apologizing for using coal. They are engineering more sustainable applications, investing in their modernization and embedding it at the heart of national economic strategies to drive productivity, resilience and resource self-sufficiency.
Combined with oil, gas, renewables and nuclear, these diversified energy systems are designed to maximize reliability while supporting growth. India, coal is central to achieving the government’s vision of Atmanirbhar Bharat, economic self-reliance built on domestic capability. With around 28,000 megawatts of modern coal capacity under construction and a further 92,000 megawatts in planning, coal remains integral to India’s economic and sustainable future. India has committed US$1 billion (₹8,500 crores) to coal gasification, targeting 100 million tonnes by 2030 to produce methanol and ammonia for fertilizers and industry, reducing import dependence while strengthening agriculture and manufacturing.
China takes a similar view. Coal sits firmly within the country’s Five-Year Plans, reflecting its role as a strategic industrial asset. China operates more coal-fired power capacity than the rest of the world’s combined wind and solar fleet, a reality many Western policymakers overlook.
It is also home to the world’s largest coal-to-hydrogen facility in Shaanxi, producing 350,000 tonnes of hydrogen annually, while coal-to-chemicals projects consume around 380 million tonnes of coal each year, roughly 8% of total coal use, supplying fuels and industrial chemicals essential to modern supply chains.
What's the other part?It is part of the solution.
Jeezus, how many times do we need to repeat it.
Is being dumb one of the requirements to be on the right of the political spectrum. Its ok, I already know the answer to that and it is in the affirmative.
Lol, triggered? Is that your new word?Maybe.. just maybe George.. Some people prefer their privacy to remain in tact. Especially when they are lying in a bed wearing fxxk all other than an often very revealing hospital gown…
I know if I was shot in the lindt cafe 10 or so years ago or at Bondi just the other day.. and heard that either Abbott or Albo (and a no doubt large media pack in tow) wanted to visit me, I would say “thanks.. but no thanks” to both..
And any other politician for that matter..
Family, friends and the nurses and doctors are all I would want coming into my hospital room thank you very much.
Politicians of any ilk not required..
You really are desperately triggered by all this aren’t you George…
Would wittle Georgie want a visit from da big special PM would he?.. Is wittle georgie a bit of an attention seeker is he?![]()
You seriously need to have an inward look and ask how you turned into a cold hearted leftieBecause they are morons making it political. An if the person telling the aide to **** off and used that language it says more about them.
At least Sussan finally found the hospital, probably due to all funerals now completed.
And good to see you back posting on this political blog after sulking for 3 years.
Strongly disagree that previous generations were less educated. Speak to an average 50+ year-old and they are better at the basics of reading, writing and maths than a Millenial with more years in formal education.An interesting read by Kos Samaras -
Why the Median Voter theory and culture wars are failing in modern Australia.
The classic model of electoral competition says parties win by converging on the “median voter” the swing voter in the middle who can genuinely choose between a centre-left and centre-right offer.
That model assumed voters actually swung.
But it was built for a different Australia: decades ago, more homogeneous, less educated, and far less psychologically sorted.
Today’s Australia looks nothing like that.
• 31.5% of Australians were born overseas (as of June 2024). 
• Australia is overwhelmingly urban (World Bank puts it at 86.8% urban in 2024). 
• Education has structurally shifted the electorate: in 2025, approximately 50% of Australians aged under 50, held a bachelor degree or higher. 
• And crucially, we have compulsory voting, plus a system that forces voters to rank preferences rather than just pick a single tribe and walk away. 
Those structural forces, migration, urbanisation, educational expansion, compulsory participation, have helped produce an electorate where identity is increasingly fixed rather than fluid.
People don’t “shop around” the middle like the past. Increasingly, they vote as a reflection of who they are (and who they are not), reinforced by peer networks, online ecosystems, and cultural reference points. The centre still exists but it’s often not persuadable in the old way.
So the median voter theorem didn’t just weaken. In practice, it broke.
The new campaign game: bloc politics + preference efficiency
If bloc politics are real, traditional campaign strategy becomes obsolete.
Because elections stop being about “converting” large pools of soft voters, and start being about:
• holding your bloc together,
• maximising preference flows, and
• punishing fragmentation on the other side.
You can see the shape of this in the 2025 federal result: Labor secured a landslide seat haul (94 seats in a 150-seat House) even as major-party support continues to dilute. 
In 2022, a similar dynamic was at play, Labor winning a majority of seats, whilst recording a record low primary. But it held it’s progressive block together a lot better. Similar trends were seen in both the Victorian and NSW state elections that followed. We even witnessed this in WA, where the correction arrived and ended up just spraying into minor parties.
Strategic implications
For the Coalition
Chasing “soft Labor voters” is, increasingly, chasing ghosts.
The path to victory narrows to two hard options:
1. Consolidate the conservative bloc with genuine preference discipline, difficult when right-of-Coalition alternatives exist precisely because parts of the base feel alienated.
2. Split the progressive bloc by making divisive issues highly salient, difficult when Labor can often neutralise or absorb popular progressive positions without losing its core.
3. Try to target older Australians voting Labor, who still behave like the median voter. It’s however a short term fix given the obvious attrition that will occur as the years roll on.
This isn’t primarily a tactical problem. It’s a structural one.
For Labor
The strategy is simpler, but not easy:
1. Hold the bloc together
2. Keep preference flows healthy from the flanks
3. Don’t start culture wars that cost you your progressive wing
4. Don’t waste time pandering to conservatives who were never available anyway
The lesson of 2025 is that you don’t need to “win the middle” the way the old textbooks insisted, you need to run your preference machine better than your opponent runs theirs. You also need to run a campaign that triggers your opponent’s flanks to bleed into minor parties. Culture wars are a massively contribute to this and up until now, Labor is doing a better job not buying into it.
Conclusion: the new electoral physics
Australian elections are no longer primarily about persuading undecided voters in the centre.
They’re about bloc consolidation and preference efficiency.
And this isn’t cyclical, it’s structural. It will persist, and likely intensify, as Gen Z grows as a share of the electorate and Millennials move into their peak participation years. These two cohorts have ushered in the bloc voting phenomenon and it only really gathered significant steam when they, as a combined group reached critical mass on the electoral roll.
In a bloc-voting world with preferential voting, a fragmented right faces a consolidated left at a permanent disadvantage.
The maths doesn’t require Labor to win every argument.
It just requires Labor to hold its coalition together while the other side can’t. It has a demographic advantage in doing that because its coalition is largely younger, whilst the big C Coalition is much older.
Chasing “soft Labor voters” is, increasingly, chasing ghosts.
It's interesting that our education system now has better resourcing with teacher to student ratios & access to better technology to assist in teaching... but why are Naplan results not really improving much & why are we lagging behind other countries like Finland?Strongly disagree that previous generations were less educated. Speak to an average 50+ year-old and they are better at the basics of reading, writing and maths than a Millenial with more years in formal education.
The biggest change in education is how politicised the curriculum has become, so most people reach adulthood firmly in that progressive bloc that has been taught everything politically right is nefarious. It doesn't matter if they prefer Greens or Labor as their preferences will always end up with one of them.
Indeed, so the next time you say the Liberals need to "move towards the centre" you are doing so knowing that it will make them less likely to win an election. I'm sure that was your intention all along.