Yes, you were hesitant but as you say softened and were ok with it, so despite early hesitation fair to say you also got excited about the prospect of what we might achieve in 2023, yeah? You also said you'd prefer Hopper over Taranto.....so let's not get too high and mighty about your genius predictions.Ok if you are going to try and be clever, at least do a good job at it.
My first post on Hopper/Taranto trade
View attachment 2581833
Later the same day, replying to our old forgotten mate R2R (who called Graham "untouchable) -wonder what ever happened to her?lmao
View attachment 2581830
Read my prediction for 2025. And read the last paragraph. "The risk is too high here, purely because i think the draft contract money will give us no moves at all moving forward if things dont work out".
Read my comment about that the team we have next year will essentially be the team we have in 2025 & if things go bad and we are 3-7 after 10 rounds, thats where we are till 2025. Guess what we were after 10 rounds 3-6-1 & Dimma quit at exactly that point. I think history shines on me pretty well, hey?
I was hell vocal on the massive risk of this move, I was just more polite back then as i was still warm from the 3 flags. My attitude at the time was the club needed to pick 1 of the 2 players, who it saw fit, and not target the 2. My opinion was Taranto was the better player ( and expected him to be the more expensive), but perhaps Hopper was the better target for us as i believed he was going to be a hell of a lot cheaper - was happy for the club to take who they felt would make the best impact - but taking both was a bad move.
More from the same day, once again with a now hilariously wrong reply/attack from R2R, once again
View attachment 2581834
Within a day of talking about the deal, I thought it was batshit crazy to take both.And gave solid reasons why that all came true
View attachment 2581839
When the deal finally went through i had softened on it a bit, but that was only IF we finished top 4 and the pick didn't end up inside the top 10. And this was after the deal was done * i had softened as what choice did i really had? I wanted the deal to work and get us back in the top 4 too - the club had made the choice so i zagged with reality.
Worth remembering from this post that the others here all thought we had robbed GWS & i'm saying - ah nope, if anything GWS did pretty damn well consideri. As it worked out it was pick 6, & we totally ****ed ourselves. I thought, at the time, we possibly overpaid on Taranto - but Hopper might be ok if we finish top 4. As it turns out, we finished bottom 6 & it made the risky deal a ****ing nightmare.
Check your facts next time you try to play Columbo. This place would be a hell of a lot different if you actually held the club as accountable as you , at least try, to do to me. I was pretty bang on i'd say
If it was up to you then you'd have happily traded for Hopper and not Taranto. Imagine we got Hopper alone and bypassed Taranto, only to see him dominate for a different club and leave us wondering 'what if'......
You also acknowledged: "Yes, getting them both makes us a much better team & more of a chance of winning the lot". And that's all the club was focussed on knowing our superstars were nearing the end.
But I do apologise about overlooking your initial commentary, it was clear you had some misgivings about getting them both into the club. If you were list manager you would've traded for Hopper only ;-)





) -wonder what ever happened to her?lmao


