Player Watch #1: Majak Daw [Part II] - returns vs Adelaide 706 days after last AFL game, torn pec & broken pelvis

Remove this Banner Ad

(Log in to remove this ad.)

BowWow1978

All Australian
Feb 6, 2012
751
622
Melbourne
AFL Club
North Melbourne
super happy for Maj and excited to see him play. Please don't let this be a catalyst for a pointless mid season run of form, resulting in an 11th placed finish and a mid level draft pick.

We need to lose to Adelaide this week. We can then get our taste of victory by smashing "Go Dees" as we have their first round pick next year and need them to implode. Literally the only game I care about winning this year is against Melbourne. It is the only win that helps us.
 

King Corey

Moderator
Jun 9, 2001
25,173
71,570
Windy Hill Safe Injecting Room
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
St Johnstone
This is great news.

But, before we all get too excited, please bear in mind there is another 72 or so hours for Maj to construct some weird and wonderful injury and be a late withdrawal.:eek:
"Sorry North Melbourne and sports fans at large waiting for a good news story - the long awaited return of Majak Daw is on hold once more due to him straining a retina while binge watching The Last Dance."
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

HELLSBELLS

Club Legend
Jun 18, 2007
1,254
1,798
VIC
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
Bayern Munich
Congrats Big Majak !! Huge effort to get back !!!

Hate to bring the mood down but is that LDU standing at the back not near the group and not coming over like the rest of the group to congratulate Maj or am I blind ? Might be reading to much into it but seems odd to me.
 

LuvtheKangas

Welcome back, Maj
Mar 11, 2006
16,715
35,812
Rising up the ladder
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Congrats Big Majak !! Huge effort to get back !!!

Hate to bring the mood down but is that LDU standing at the back not near the group and not coming over like the rest of the group to congratulate Maj or am I blind ? Might be reading to much into it but seems odd to me.
No mate, that's wrong. Stop the video at 0:35 for proof.
 

Top Bottom