- Apr 1, 2017
- 4,417
- 10,238
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
where is the 'i don't like button'?can't kick, can't tackle.. yet. plenty to work on. Don't think he should be in our team, and think Brad Scott is right on this one
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
where is the 'i don't like button'?can't kick, can't tackle.. yet. plenty to work on. Don't think he should be in our team, and think Brad Scott is right on this one
Rubbish call regarding Fishy he's been great since mid/late last yearI agree with you re Swallow, Gibson and Mullet (assuming sarcasm) they are all washed up hacks. However, Clarke needs to do more for mine. His kicking is suspect and if you watch his tackle pressure closely its not great. not saying he doesn't have a future, i think he'll come good in time, but for now he's not a walk up start
wing needs a good delivery skill to inside 50 which Gibson doesn't have. he has to improve more.Get him in and leave him on the wing for the rest of the year
not a rubbish call at all. he's a nothing player. prefer Hansen any dayRubbish call regarding Fishy he's been great since mid/late last year
different type of players.not a rubbish call at all. he's a nothing player. prefer Hansen any day
Great? Geez, that's generous. He's been decent since he's come back into the side last year and I thought he was quite good yesterday. I would say that he's still ranked somewhere between 18-25 at the club, on a power rankings type of thing basis.Rubbish call regarding Fishy he's been great since mid/late last year
Completely different players. Not sure you've noticed, but this year since Mullett has been playing our movement out of defence has been so much better since he's been taking kick outs. Also, his defending has improved immensely since he was last in the team. Looks composed in the contest and is holding his feet.not a rubbish call at all. he's a nothing player. prefer Hansen any day
OK but on a scale from "washed up hack" to "been playing great", he's a lot close to the latter.Great? Geez, that's generous. He's been decent since he's come back into the side last year and I thought he was quite good yesterday. I would say that he's still ranked somewhere between 18-25 at the club, on a power rankings type of thing basis.
So he's at the wrong end of the scale in selection terms.OK but on a scale from "washed up hack" to "been playing great", he's a lot close to the latter.
Strong tanning game though.... up there with Press for mine...Looks like putting on defensive pressure is something he needs to work on.
The thing is though, would you rather a guy like Clarke who can rack up the pill at will and be an effective offensive weapon but who might have defensive deficiencies or someone like Swallow who is good defensively and structurally, but who offers very little going forward these days?Clearly there is an issue with his application defensively. It is obvious that he is a great ball hunter and has no problem running end to end so it must be that his ball hunting is a bit blinkered and he leaves holes defensively. That's ok. He will work it out and smash it when he gets back in.
It comes down to winning over development. Swallow is in the side for what I m sure are various reasons, one of which is likely his ability to understand what he has to do to keep within structures. This tells me that the club is trying to strike a balance between development and success. Whilst we a 0-4 I think we believe that we are not yet at the throw the kids in stage. TBH I reckon at 0-5 we may as well.The thing is though, would you rather a guy like Clarke who can rack up the pill at will and be an effective offensive weapon but who might have defensive deficiencies or someone like Swallow who is good defensively and structurally, but who offers very little going forward these days?
Perhaps I'm over-simplifying it (in fact, I'm certain, that I am) and it's important to have a balance of different types, but I would have thought that with the current state of our list we could allow someone like Clarke to learn those defensive duties in the seniors and make use of his attacking talents.
The thing is though, would you rather a guy like Clarke who can rack up the pill at will and be an effective offensive weapon but who might have defensive deficiencies or someone like Swallow who is good defensively and structurally, but who offers very little going forward these days?
Perhaps I'm over-simplifying it (in fact, I'm certain, that I am) and it's important to have a balance of different types, but I would have thought that with the current state of our list we could allow someone like Clarke to learn those defensive duties in the seniors and make use of his attacking talents.
with this years logo as wellI'm very impressed with the interviewers knob warmer.
Can i get one of those at the rooshop?
Yeah, I personally think we're at that stage already. I don't see much difference between 0-4, 1-4 or 0-5, but I agree with your point about the winning vs development.It comes down to winning over development. Swallow is in the side for what I m sure are various reasons, one of which is likely his ability to understand what he has to do to keep within structures. This tells me that the club is trying to strike a balance between development and success. Whilst we a 0-4 I think we believe that we are not yet at the throw the kids in stage. TBH I reckon at 0-5 we may as well.