Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Dunn needs to improve but I don't think that now is the time to get too happy with the axe - given our poor year it is in many ways speculation on how good a player he could be for us. Once the team is playing better and we have players genuinely competing for spots then we can trim the fat IMO. I thought Dunn wasn't too bad as a tagger and if he can improve on that then he serves a purpose even if it wasn't the primary one in mind at the time of getting him. I must admit that I am dissapointed that he didn't come on as a handy forward target as I had hoped a while back but the club realised this fairly early on and improvised with him.In my opinion i think we should get rid of him, he doesnt really ad any benefit to the team we dont need him as a tagger we have a daniel bell who would be far much better as a tagger he also shows more of a spark for the future . IMO.
If there were any players on the radar as you put it then yeah Dunn would probably be one of them but Bailey is in the phase of still seeing what Dunn has to offer the team. The mere fact that they gave him a tagging role meant that they wanted to see what his other strengths are and Dunn was ok at it. Also Bailey impresses me with his philosophy and a good coach first and foremost develops his players when they are not at the level required and gives them a reasonable chance to prove themselves so hopefully Dunn and other players can step up.ok fair point i dont mean push him out the door this instant, but comon? surely he has to be on Dean Baileys rader of suspect players??
why? what qualities have Dunn shown?? at least IMO Bell has shown a little bit
Round: 7 (WCE)
Stats: 12 disposals at 92%, 5 marks
My Thoughts: For the second week in a row was initially named at CHF but ended but starting on the bench and moving straight onto the wing. Didn't get too much of it there but when Rivers & Frawley went down he was sent back, rotating through McKinley, Hunter and Kennedy. Was alright in patches
Once again, though, it didn't appear (to the removed spectator) that he had a defined role for the day. If I had the luxury of being in the team meetings etc. then I'd be able to give you an answer but when he's going from CHF (ok, initial team lists don't mean much these days) to the bench, to the wing and then finally down back, it's all just a bit baffling. A utility in the true sense of the term.
Rating: 5.5
Keep his spot: Yes. With Frawley and Rivers out, he may just find himself playing down back this week. Or on the wing. Or up forward...
Swimming against the tide at the moment.Your thoughts on Dunn's hopes for the 2010 season?
How many games do you see him playing etc?
