I was having a beer after work with some mates and we asked this question.
What type of governance would allow 2 assets that you own be treated so differently. One asset is first to market and 7 years later another asset hits the market with no additional investment. Is this dumb business or plain bias!
The crem de la crem is signing off a 20 million dollar white elephant investment that will be pissed down the drain. This is all while the rest of football is dying of starvation.
Is this the greatest scandal or complete rort of all time. If you saw this with no history you would think this type of travesty would have at least seen instant dismissal of the relevant signatories
Then again it's the team for all South Australians and a laughing stock to everybody outside of the Murray Bridge boundary
What type of governance would allow 2 assets that you own be treated so differently. One asset is first to market and 7 years later another asset hits the market with no additional investment. Is this dumb business or plain bias!
The crem de la crem is signing off a 20 million dollar white elephant investment that will be pissed down the drain. This is all while the rest of football is dying of starvation.
Is this the greatest scandal or complete rort of all time. If you saw this with no history you would think this type of travesty would have at least seen instant dismissal of the relevant signatories
Then again it's the team for all South Australians and a laughing stock to everybody outside of the Murray Bridge boundary





