I know hindsight is always 20/20 but I think you might have gone a bit too early on this call Re: Taylor. Out of all the players you've put ahead of him I'd only be happy to have Dangerfield at the Cats more, and even then Danger would be structurally less important to the side than Taylor is now.1. Cotchin (2)
2. Dangerfield (10)
3. Walker (75)
4. Rioli (12)
5. Kreuzer (1)
6. Selwood (22)
7. Mumford (rd 57)
8. Ward (19)
9. Henderson (8)
10. Rance (18)
11. McEvoy (9)
12. Bellchambers (psd 8)
13. Masten (3)
14. Taylor (17)
15. Grimes (14)
16. Ebert (13)
17. Whitecross (29)
18. Thompson (37)
19. Mayne (40)
I rank Thompson and Taylor lower because I think they benefit from having 3 to 4 years on their fellow draftees, giving them an advantage, and I suspect a few more players will surpass them. I also think that if the draft was redone more clubs would still rather the player who offers more years to the club than Taylor. For instance I agree that Taylor is better than Henderson, but Henderson will offer 3-4 more years than Taylor and will probably surpass him. Interestingly enough 16 of the top 19 came from the top 40. But it's fairly even and to be honest I don't see much difference between say the likes of Mumford and Bellchambers.





