2009 Supercoach Discussion Thread

[SJ]

Well, at the time I had not 1 problem with my team, so traded Harvey for Davis. Davis 176 this week and mass average. That wasn't the bad trade.

The bad trade was getting Harvey back lol.

No the bad trade was trading him out. It is a golden rule for a reason. Keepers are not in your team to make money, and they are not in your team to trade out after a bad game or two.

 

[Athomas]

No the bad trade was trading him out. It is a golden rule for a reason. Keepers are not in your team to make money, and they are not in your team to trade out after a bad game or two.

What about 3?

The point is, If I didn't make the trade I'd be 210 points worse off atm. It might have broken a rule, but it was beneficial.

 

[SJ]

But you'd be two trades better off. I'd take the trades.

 

[Athomas]

But you'd be two trades better off. I'd take the trades.

I'm not gonna argue, because I know you were very good last year. How are you going this year?

 

[IDIG]

lazy 13 touches for the great man in the first quarter

 

[SJ]

I'm not gonna argue, because I know you were very good last year. How are you going this year?

I wasn't as good last year as 2007 but better this year, 575th so far and should improve this week too. And wasn't meaning to have a go at you mate, I've learnt those lessons the hard way in the past too.

 

[Lotch]

Petrenko and Walker not given much TOG.

Out of favour?

 

[Athomas]

OMFG

Was up by 129 points in league match... my smartass opponent who smashed me in DT only had Otten left in this SC match.

Check Otten's score. absolutely ridiculous.

 

[Judd_Magic]

OMFG

Was up by 129 points in league match... my smartass opponent who smashed me in DT only had Otten left in this SC match.

Check Otten's score. absolutely ridiculous.

Ouch! The pain, the pain!

 

[Athomas]

Ouch! The pain, the pain!

Oh well. I care more about overall ranking.. which will also be painful

 

[IDIG]

Oh shit that's terrible.

Gee hope Walker or Petrenko don't get a rest next week. I've got enough non playing benchers as it is.

 

[Athomas]

Pleasantly suprised. Hille and Harvey hurt, scored 2145.

overall ranking: 638 of 313,449

moved down 31 spots only. Incredible.

Burgoyne back from suspension, trading Harvey and Hille this week too.



EDIT: WTF HILLE AND HARVEY LOST $$$ . Strange

 

[weagles_fan]

Anyone know where I can find the break evens?

 

[dUkezz]

www.tooserious.com.au

 

[weagles_fan]

www.tooserious.com.au

Cheers

 

[Spudregus_87]

Petrenko and Walker not given much TOG.

Out of favour?

Yeah. Thought that when I saw their scores. Thought they would both tear it up against the Dees. Now it'll hurt their breakevens next week.... Come on Craig David - play the kids!

 

[Judd_Magic]

Yeah. Thought that when I saw their scores. Thought they would both tear it up against the Dees. Now it'll hurt their breakevens next week.... Come on Craig David - play the kids!

Having both of these chumps on the ground really dented my score. Instead of getting over 2300 I only got 2212

From now on its Hille and M.Brown on the ground for me, they seem to be the more reliable and higher scoring out of the four mentioned players.

Best to know this now I guess then later when it costs you for having the wrong ones on the ground.

 

[Hawkmad]

EDIT: WTF HILLE AND HARVEY LOST $$$ . Strange

Not suprised here. Was to be expected as they actually "SCORED ZERO" if you get what I mean.

 

[Athomas]

Not suprised here. Was to be expected as they actually "SCORED ZERO" if you get what I mean.

I was only suprised because in DT they didn't + EMG scores were included. Before the whole thing I was expecting a 0 and price drop.

 

[Drifter]

Good afternoon SC people,

2 questions - are breakevens available anywhere for players or do you have to subscribe to Too Serious???

2nd question then - if not publically available does anyone know the breakevens for

Luke Power
Adam Goodes
Brett Stanton

Cheers

 

[IDIG]

Just create an account on tooserious takes 2 seconds. Stanton's would be low though as he's scored quite well the last 3 games. Other two would be high-ish id say but dont quote me.

 

[Drifter]

Just create an account on tooserious takes 2 seconds. Stanton's would be low though as he's scored quite well the last 3 games. Other two would be high-ish id say but dont quote me.

Thanks mate

 

[Hawkmad]

Good afternoon SC people,

2 questions - are breakevens available anywhere for players or do you have to subscribe to Too Serious???Just create a login for Too Serious(cost nothing although there is a donate button) and you will get all the details you need

2nd question then - if not publically available does anyone know the breakevens for - Seeing you asked nicely

Luke Power - 143
Adam Goodes - 133
Brett Stanton - 52

Cheers

Refer to bolded answers

 

[Hawkmad]

Just create an account on tooserious takes 2 seconds. Stanton's would be low though as he's scored quite well the last 3 games. Other two would be high-ish id say but dont quote me.

Damn i've got to learn to type quicker.

 

[Drifter]

Refer to bolded answers

Good by you boys

If you had a midfield of Ablett, Selwood, Schammer, Rich, Beams, Barham, Robertson (bench), Anthony (bench) and $604K in the bank

I am looking at 2 upgrades

I will wait to Friday to see if the Collingwood boys are selected.

On the proviso that Barham plays this week - I will hold him to make some $$

Then I will prob trade Robertson for Stanton

And wait for Power to potentially drop some more then next week upgrade a Pie for Power.

Any thoughts - better ideas???