I would for 19 & 21 for same reasons as Bob. I wouldn't do one with the Dogs though. That's getting too low.
Well call Dan and Blair cos i'm in too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I would for 19 & 21 for same reasons as Bob. I wouldn't do one with the Dogs though. That's getting too low.
I don't think Ahern makes 12 or Weller for that matter. Think its more likely to be Duggan or De Goey vs Blakely and Ellis (or Garlett ect..)
Weller wont be there, If he was i would take him no questionI don't think Ahern makes 12 or Weller for that matter. Think its more likely to be Duggan or De Goey vs Blakely and Ellis (or Garlett ect..)
I would personally prefer #19,#21 but if they were not interested i would certainly do the doggies selection as well provided we upgrade our 3rd aswellWould you trade down Bob? 12 to 19 and 21 or the dogs 3 picks?
I wouldnt add #32 and believe the Doggies would take what i posted , the doggies have enough young playersWould we have to chuck in 33 for the bullies?? 12 for 3 picks in the 20's is hard to judge the value.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Weller wont be there, If he was i would take him no question
Who is taking Weller? I agree he won't be there but just wondering if you'd heard something. I've heard Crows like Ahern a lot.
Would GWS do it? Doubt it. There's a reason we'd want to do it and they wouldn't and it's the same reason. It's fairly even. If we had a top 10 pick they might consider it.Well call Dan and Blair cos i'm in too.
Would GWS do it? Doubt it. There's a reason we'd want to do it and they wouldn't and it's the same reason. It's fairly even. If we had a top 10 pick they might consider it.
With all the players they lose they probably aren't as inclined to just take 3 high picks and walk out.Maybe but GWS are just suckers for higher picks.
With all the players they lose they probably aren't as inclined to just take 3 high picks and walk out.
My apologies.Stop being so logical.
I want Garlett, Blakely and Cockatoo.
Would GWS do it? Doubt it. There's a reason we'd want to do it and they wouldn't and it's the same reason. It's fairly even. If we had a top 10 pick they might consider it.
They will still have to replace Jaksch and JOR plus the old men retiring and any duds. I think if we had a top 10 pick where they could be assured of a Weller/Pickett/Ahern type they'd jump at, but pick 12, probably not. For the exact reasons that everyone wants us to downgrade (i.e. the evenness)Not likely but certainly not impossible IMO
They have to start cutting their list down pretty soon so they'll want only the best possible talent they can get.
They will still have to replace Jaksch and JOR plus the old men retiring and any duds. I think if we had a top 10 pick where they could be assured of a Weller/Pickett/Ahern type they'd jump at, but pick 12, probably not. For the exact reasons that everyone wants us to downgrade (i.e. the evenness)
Frost? Who they will probably get something useless for. They probably won't draft beyond their own 2nd rounder. I just can't see them going for it personally, as much as I'd love them to.True, but it's not like they're losing players to retirement either (bar Hunt). They're not really losing any more players than other clubs.
Well apparently we have a strategy for the draft this year which I assume will involve doing something like what you have mentioned. If we go in with just picks 12,32 and 52 I don't like our chances of nailing this draft.Ask GWS if they are interested - They have #19 & #21
Or Bulldogs will have #26,#27,#28,#45
We could do a swap for #12+#52
They will still have to replace Jaksch and JOR plus the old men retiring and any duds. I think if we had a top 10 pick where they could be assured of a Weller/Pickett/Ahern type they'd jump at, but pick 12, probably not. For the exact reasons that everyone wants us to downgrade (i.e. the evenness)
Yeah just best case scenario I was working to. If we gave up 12 and Ahern landed there but we got a couple of goodies would it be detrimental? Probably not.
Knightmare has Cockatoo going at #13 now whilst De Goey (15) Ahern (19) Duggan (20) Ellis (25) and Blakely (30) have slipped. 20 pages ago we were saying Cockatoo at #31 and DeGoey/Ahern/Duggan at #12. We really should trade our #12 + #33 for GWS #19 + #21 (+ possibly Whiley if we're lucky) because that would give us the best chance of getting 2 of the above players.
I'd only do 12+33 for 19+21 if Whiley was included.Knightmare has Cockatoo going at #13 now whilst De Goey (15) Ahern (19) Duggan (20) Ellis (25) and Blakely (30) have slipped. 20 pages ago we were saying Cockatoo at #31 and DeGoey/Ahern/Duggan at #12. We really should trade our #12 + #33 for GWS #19 + #21 (+ possibly Whiley if we're lucky) because that would give us the best chance of getting 2 of the above players.
GWS only have pick 21 to play with at the moment as pick 24 is tied to Steele, unless you mean pick 19 assuming they get that when they trade JOR to Hawthorn.Weller wont be there, If he was i would take him no question
I would personally prefer #19,#21 but if they were not interested i would certainly do the doggies selection as well provided we upgrade our 3rd aswell
I wouldnt add #32 and believe the Doggies would take what i posted , the doggies have enough young players
Don't take it as gospel. Online draft gurus including Kightmare have had guys like Dayle Garlett, Tyler Chalwell and Waylen Manson in the first round only for them to go underrated.
Edit- Not to say Cockatoo will go undrafted, just the Nakai is the man of the moment and people could be getting carried away
i am guru he is gunAnd how do you propose we do this trade guru?
That would mean we are giving up #33 for whiley as i believe #12 is worth the other 2 selectionsI'd only do 12+33 for 19+21 if Whiley was included.