Experimental
Norm Smith Medallist
- Joined
- May 20, 2012
- Posts
- 6,972
- Reaction score
- 9,565
- Location
- Brisbane
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions

- Other Teams
- Green Bay Packers
It's up on the AFL website!Where did you find that..?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

WB v SYD · RIC v MEL · HAW v GCS · ESS v COL · PA v GEE · FRE v CAR · StK v WCE · BL v ADE · GWS v NM ·
Weekend Wrap and "Liked, Learned, Hated" right here -- How did tipping go?
It's up on the AFL website!Where did you find that..?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
He's a dangerous small forward, really good hands. He is nowhere near a mid though, no pace and no endurance. 15 goals in 8 games against stronger opposition this year is a worry.Bags of 10 12 and 8
Small forward/midfield worth a rookie shot
http://boundforglorynews.com/2015-draft-profile-blake-hardwick/
If we lose Charlie, then we need a pick around 7-8 in return for Blake's teamate Sam Weideman, Burton or Curnow if he falls that low. Allows us the best mid in the draft and also a dangerous 3rd tall forward.
Essendon are really keen on Parish now. We have first crack unless we beat them this week and then knock over Port.
Let's beat the Bombers by 100 points causing them to sack Hird, then take Parish to piss them off.Essendon are really keen on Parish now. We have first crack unless we beat them this week and then knock over Port.
You're such a shit stirrerLet's beat the Bombers by 100 points causing them to sack Hird, then take Parish to piss them off.

Let's beat the Bombers by 100 points causing them to sack Hird, then take Parish to piss them off.
hird is already gone lolLet's beat the Bombers by 100 points causing them to sack Hird, then take Parish to piss them off.
Didn't take long. Maybe he read my post.hird is already gone lol
Not so sure - Thompson has been non existent this season - I'd be going key back -Weitering...Barrett stating we will not take Schache or Weitering if we end up with pick 1 or 2. No talls for us this draft, running mids only.
Not surprising at all. Basically exactly what the club has already said.Barrett stating we will not take Schache or Weitering if we end up with pick 1 or 2. No talls for us this draft, running mids only.
It's pretty obvious that picks one and two are going to be Schache and Weitering, in whichever order. What isn't obvious though, is which players will go at picks 3, 4, 5, 6, etc.So no Schache Weitering or Francis pfft..
As if you don't take 1 of the top 3 players in the draft.
The flogs just saying we won't take them because they won't be available when our pick comes up!
?Clearly trading the high pick