I have no problem with Toxic, as being respectful and not trolling...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Your choice. I didn't say go, just pointed out you are free not to post here if you find our responses so tedious.See ya
I'll assume you represent the masses and leave this thread
I hope you have a meaningful one sided discussion in front of the mirror
Was agreed he was a good example
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I can't be bothered breaking it down to words you would understand. But great work parroting a response you have copied of somebody else. So I'll pass on your request.Tell me more?
Your choice. I didn't say go, just pointed out you are free not to post here if you find our responses so tedious.
But play the victim. Collingwood modus operandi it seems
Either do I. He responded in a condescending manner to a post of mine. I would think I have a right to remind him where he is posting. I wasn't rude and he then sooked and played the victim.I have no problem with Toxic, as being respectful and not trolling...
as Collingwood supporters go I think Toxic is one who usually has some interesting info and is generally respectful when he pops over for a chat.
So I now can't respond to a smart arse post from an opposition supporter on our board? Show me where I was rude to him. He chose his high horse. He can ride it off into the sunsetEasy up mate.
I'd drive Farren there myself today and hand him over.Any interest in Toumpas on the cheap? Straight swap for Ray?
28 touches, 8 tackles, 2 goals against us in round 11..Any interest in Toumpas on the cheap? Straight swap for Ray?
28 touches, 8 tackles, 2 goals against us in round
If anyone could get the best out of him it'd be our Richo. I'd be keen to give him a go for sure.He looked good in that game. Kid has serious talent but lost a lot of confidence under Roos. I'd love to take the punt, he's exactly what we need as an outside mid.
hell noFor arguments sake there's no compensation picks involved, would our first round pick #5, second round pick #24 and our third rounder #42 for Collingwood's first #7, second #26 and Nathan Freeman be a fair trade? It would equate Freeman being worth pick #28.
What's the consensus on Lennon not signing yet? Tigers are amping up, he's played games, probably has a reasonable offer in front of him.
Makes a lot less sense than Freeman anyway.
I'm getting carried away because this is media driven, & ego's have been hit for six..Let's get it back on to d&t

How was Freeman rated on here in his draft year by some of you U18 experts
The issue I have is that it doesnt matter how good our back end might look in 3 years time, if we dont get that elite midfield it is all for naught. Carlisle has played some very good footy... ages ago and has suspension hovering. Pick 5 being traded would have to guarantee another gun mid coming in as well as Carlisle for it to be worth it. Freeman is the risky prospect that might make us but wont break us.
*edit, to add keep in mind we HAVE to draft at least 2 players + Sinclair elevation. If we pull in 3 traded players 2 more spots need to be opened up if no one is traded out. Its getting hard to cut any more at this point. One of the reasons I would rather take 5 to the draft.
I didnt really know Robbo that well, I only play 3rds so most of the senior guys I dont interact with that much, but I get the feeling the poor year the club had (both due to form and a 2014 saints level injury list that killed us from snrs to 3rds) probably influenced him to leave. I wouldnt doubt him going back to Ormond though.