Remove this Banner Ad

2016 Non Crows AFL Discussion thread Part 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaytex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Did anyone listen to Rucci this morning?
Was he praising it?

Sent from my LG-V410 using Tapatalk

I heard Rucci a few days ago fapping on about how powerful the last five minutes supposedly are and how it apparently sets the scene for a successful 2017.
 
Stuart Crameri is getting married Friday night! Delistable planning

In his defence, he probably looked at the calendar, and saw Friday 30 September follows that last Saturday in September.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad


Considering Frankston were in administration and bankrupt, it was hardly "stunning". Hyperbole much?
 
This is a pretty unimportant question. But who is the first listed team for the Grand Final? Bulldogs because they came from the top side of the finals fixture? Or Sydney because they finished higher in the H&A season?

i.e. should it be
W. Bulldogs v Sydney; or
Sydney v W. Bulldogs?
I'm no expert but surely Sydney VS Western Bulldogs

Sent from my LG-V410 using Tapatalk
 
I heard Rucci a few days ago fapping on about how powerful the last five minutes supposedly are and how it apparently sets the scene for a successful 2017.

The last 5 minutes of Halloween 4 set the scene for Part 5, that worked out well too...
 
I heard Rucci a few days ago fapping on about how powerful the last five minutes supposedly are and how it apparently sets the scene for a successful 2017.
That's the only part I saw and it had all the players in the room with Hinkley and KT saying it wasn't good enough and they needed to think over the summer what they want to achieve. Big ****kng deal.
 
Considering Frankston were in administration and bankrupt, it was hardly "stunning". Hyperbole much?

The VFL were more worried about them being competitive on field than their flatlined off field position.

They terminated the licence when the administrators said they were focused on the club's finances than on field performance.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The VFL were more worried about them being competitive on field than their flatlined off field position.

They terminated the licence when the administrators said they were focused on the club's finances than on field performance.

That's harsh, not like they'd be the only VFL team kicked from pillar to post each season.
 
This is a pretty unimportant question. But who is the first listed team for the Grand Final? Bulldogs because they came from the top side of the finals fixture? Or Sydney because they finished higher in the H&A season?

i.e. should it be
W. Bulldogs v Sydney; or
Sydney v W. Bulldogs?

I'm no expert but surely Sydney VS Western Bulldogs

Nope, it should be Western Bulldogs vs. Sydney

Historically, I thought the winner of the first prelim hosts the GF regardless of their ladder position.
 
Someone on the port board seriously tabled Lobbe for Crameri.
I'd start following figure skating if I was that clueless about football.

What a forking numpty
 
Someone on the port board seriously tabled Lobbe for Crameri.
I'd start following figure skating if I was that clueless about football.

What a forking numpty

"So we've got a player we don't want, they have a player we want... obvious trade!"
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

The Bulldogs beat them at the SCG this year.

They've got the midfield to match Sydney, they will have more run and they won't just bomb it to the Sydney defenders, they will use their elite skills to find players just as they have this whole finals series.
Either of the Bulldogs or GWS were the two best equipped teams to handle Sydney if they made it to the GF, I think it'll be a cracking game.
 
Turn it up.

We have 15 to 20 active posters who don't want the crows in the SANFL but are way too gutless to post it.
I'm the opposite. I don't want the SANFL to have the Crows. It's an insult to our players to play in such an amateur comp, let alone to pay for the privilege.
 
This is gold. From the AFL website:

"Veteran Hawks campaigner Sam Mitchell has seven votes tonight and that's 211 across his career, moving him a solitary vote ahead of two-time medallist Chris Judd in fourth spot on the all-time tally."

A mistake or do people at the AFL feel the same way about the campaigner everyone else does?
 
This is gold. From the AFL website:

"Veteran Hawks campaigner Sam Mitchell has seven votes tonight and that's 211 across his career, moving him a solitary vote ahead of two-time medallist Chris Judd in fourth spot on the all-time tally."

A mistake or do people at the AFL feel the same way about the campaigner everyone else does?

Did Eddie write it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom