Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2019 Draft Prospects

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wizard17
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I definitely think he's a great player and would be best available at many picks. I'd just question if he could get a game in our side and whether we'd be better to get someone who could fill a need this year. It's like GWS taking Caldwell and Hately in last year's draft, very good players, just didn't seem like the kind the side needed most.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I hope we don't go with an inside mid. It would be frustrating to go back to last year when we constantly won the clearances but couldn't find a way to score, or early this year when Lipinski was stuck in the VFL because there was no room for another midfielder.
 
Would everyone be happy with Bergman at13 ?

He's certainly a very interesting one. Checked three rankings: Twomey has him at 17, Fox Sports 20, Draft Central 10-25. Seems to have some versatility: a winger with a booming kick or a forward who is athletic and can take a strong grab. Listed at 189cm and 83kg by Twomey, he's already a powerful lad.

I'd consider him a reasonable choice if the club took him and we need to take into account a very good point made in this thread by someone(s) that with two likely matches before our pick, we will be using it as pick 15 by the time our turn comes around. So would hardly be a reach on the three rankings I cited above. The negative appears to be that he is not a particularly prolific ball winner. But, hey, if he was he would be going before our pick from what I can gather about his game.
 
You can't have enough of this type of player. Blokes who can find and win their own football and average 30 possessions a game with excellent disposal skills. You can play 'em in the middle, on a wing, as a rover, as a ruck rover, as a half forward flanker, swap 'em off the bench with your other guns. If he gets to our pick, we should take him.
Strongly disagree. We have too much of this player, to the point where there's an argument guys as good as Liberatore and Wallis aren't in our best 22.

We selected this exact type of player with our first rounder last year in Smith. Midfield is our strongest area by far, and we arguable have the best in the AFL. It's time to shore up other areas of the ground.
 
Last edited:
He's certainly a very interesting one. Checked three rankings: Twomey has him at 17, Fox Sports 20, Draft Central 10-25. Seems to have some versatility: a winger with a booming kick or a forward who is athletic and can take a strong grab. Listed at 189cm and 83kg by Twomey, he's already a powerful lad.

I'd consider him a reasonable choice if the club took him and we need to take into account a very good point made in this thread by someone(s) that with two likely matches before our pick, we will be using it as pick 15 by the time our turn comes around. So would hardly be a reach on the three rankings I cited above. The negative appears to be that he is not a particularly prolific ball winner. But, hey, if he was he would be going before our pick from what I can gather about his game.
And with our handball happy style he could be that critical link in the chain to break the lines and bring Bruce and Naughts into the game.
Fair chance his numbers go up playing with us. Do like the idea of a Winger with a booming kick could well be invaluable, would also make it harder for the opposition to just sit on JJ
 
Who would people be unhappy that we draft?
Depends what number the picks end up, the more thinking I do the more it makes sense to move back picks
by trading 13 & 53 for two mid range picks as pick 53 was difficult to forecast. The two players I selected
quickly moved into the thirties in most of the mocks. I saw a scenario yesterday where Melbourne took
Luke Jackson at pick 3 ahead of Hayden Young, Melbourne scare me when they have low picks.
 
If still around at 53 - we could do worse than Mitch O'Neil. Dual AA whose season only tailed off due to PCL injury in back half.

Tassie boy who is a die hard bulldog fan as well.

 

Remove this Banner Ad

Who would people be unhappy that we draft?
Inside mid or half back flanker type unless they’re unbelievably quick. I’d be disappointed if we drafted someone who has a ceiling as a B to B + player. I’d rather someone who could be a D or an A+. Take a risk. When I say B to B+ type player drafting I’m talking about a guy like Powell-Pepper. Ready to go, instant impact but never had much room to improve.
 
McAsey, O’Neill, Kellett, Georgiades.
All have some (tenuous) link to the club. If we can’t get all of these 4, we should pass at every pick, even 13. Show the football world we mean business.




😉
 
Maybe some of these prospective draftees should consider a Bruce McAvaney campaign to enhance their
popularity and make them a fair dinkum part of Australian culture. :think::poo::think::poo::fire::thumbsdown:
 
AFL Site getting really lazy with these highlight videos, they're all like 1 minute now.

giantroo did a way better job in previous years, but of course the AFL decided to file a copywrite complaint against his youtube channel.
 

Interesting rankings from Champion Data. Gould top 10, Mahony at 14, Kemp at 21, Weightman at 30, no sign of Bergman.

I think we are still a sneaky chance for taking Gould at our pick.

Just because he is physically bigger then most at his age didn’t mean that he doesn’t have as much potential or room to grow.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I think we are still a sneaky chance for taking Gould at our pick.

Just because he is physically bigger then most at his age didn’t mean that he doesn’t have as much potential or room to grow.

If we got Gould, and someone like Ned Cahill or Ben Sokol, I'd definitely be happy with our draft.
 
I think we are still a sneaky chance for taking Gould at our pick.

Just because he is physically bigger then most at his age didn’t mean that he doesn’t have as much potential or room to grow.
Won't happen. Being "bigger" isn't the issue, being fatter is. Recruiters do not like players who prioritize hotdogs ahead of their football, and 106kg at 191cm at the combine testing is absolutely unacceptable.
 
Won't happen. Being "bigger" isn't the issue, being fatter is. Recruiters do not like players who prioritize hotdogs over their football, and 106kg at 191cm in the combine testing is absolutely unacceptable.

He's put in the discipline and lost at least 6kg and a big percentage off his skinfolds since the combine.
 
If we got Gould, and someone like Ned Cahill or Ben Sokol, I'd definitely be happy with our draft.

Like I said earlier. We need to plan for the next phase if half backs.
Bevo LOVES suckling and he is integral to our game plan. We have to find a long term replacement, and I think Gould fits the bill for this.
 
He's put in the discipline and lost at least 6kg and a big percentage off his skinfolds since the combine.
Losing weight at the last minute isn't going to immediately fire him up into top 10 calculations. Before that, he'd have been lucky to be drafted at all.

Even then, in the context of our pick 13 selection, another HBFer is the last thing we need, along with another inside mid. Again, we're in a position where we can't find room for Bailey Williams in the best 22, even though he proved himself a quality player in 2018.
 
Losing weight at the last minute isn't going to immediately fire him up into top 10 calculations. Before that, he'd have been lucky to be drafted at all.

Even then, in the context of our pick 13 selection, another HBFer is the last thing we need, along with another inside mid. Again, we're in a position where we can't find room for Bailey Williams in the best 22, even though he proved himself a quality player in 2018.

Guess we'll have to agree to disagree. I don't think he'll end up with us, he's said that the clubs he's had the most interviews with are Adelaide and Geelong. If he does, I'll be happy to see how he grows and develops in our colours.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom