Gethelred
Moderator
- May 1, 2016
- 34,432
- 65,369
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Moderator
- #4,951
What I'm saying is that, by needing to cover multiple different types of player, we reduce our side's offensive ability to perhaps only halve a contest once every few games because the tagging/defensive player in the role is not specialized. Most of the time, the first touch contested mids are big, slow but powerful types; while Neale and Mitchell aren't slow exactly, nor do they truly possess the breakaway pace someone like Danger or Dusty does. In order to sit these players, why not have Jack just become a version of Cam Ling, someone who takes the opposition best clearance winner and forces them to haphazard each and every stoppage?I’m not disagreeing with that at all.
Agreed on targeting a player; it’s not necessarily the ‘best’ player, the most prolific ball winner, the typical first receiver.... sometime it may be them, but other times it’s shaping the stoppage, moving the congestion to where they want space to operate.
I think what you’re describing as a singular role would also be shared across several players. I'd look at it as the midfield group being defensively minded at the stoppage rather than a 'pure tag' role (be it around the ground or solely at the stoppage).
I’d be much more comfortable with the Cripps-Setterfield-Silvagni combo at stoppages around the ground than at centre bounces where there’s so much more time and space thanks to 6-6-6. Centre bounces I definitely prefer having a more dynamic player in combination with the ‘big boys’.
It’s all good and well to play to our strengths, like the contested ball, but I’m not sure we should go ‘all in’ and get completely obliterated on the spread every time we don’t win our tap or shark their ruckman.
Like everything, there's always balance, and having flexibility to move between multiple modes or run several simultaneously, depending on how the match is playing out. It's a really interesting discussion, and there's a ridiculous number of permutations that could eventuate, particularly when you start factoring in midfield combinations we could see in 2021 (adding Williams, Setters and Walsh continuing to develop, older heads Ed & Murph, are SPS & Willo moving up the ground, does a Dow/Kemp/O'Brien/Stocker/Fisher/Martin/Fogarty/etc force their way into the midfield group, etc).
That way, you gain a greater degree to plan, instead of needing to come up with more eventualities. I don't like the idea of using multiple players as taggers because it's yet another thing they're going to have to learn on top of improving clearances, fitness etc, and very frequently changing dynamic players into meat and potatoes mids is an irreversible thing.
I'd much rather have early Port Wingard than the Hawthorn version.
Last edited:






"Goddess"