Remove this Banner Ad

2020 Trade & List Management discussion

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Yawn, I'm not arguing 2021. I'm arguing based on what we actually did in 2020. Now, next year we might see out of form seniors dropped more or injured seniors firced to recuperate. But we didn't do much, if any of the 2 in 2020. Until there's on the ground evidence of the cultural shift at selection, I don't know how you can argue that's it's certain to have happened.
It’s like you never watched the 2019 trade period and 2020 season and are immersed in our 2018/19 seasons still
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Why ?? Clearly we don't rate Luke highly enough to bother locking him in as he wouldn't be in the 4 picks we plan to use.
We aren't locked into picking him if we nominate. He can be rookie listed for nothing or we can pass. There is no downside at all that I can see.
 
Sounds like we only plan on taking our first four picks then matching Borlase and or Newchurch

really there’s no room for Edwards so best he put his best foot forward at other clubs
No room...because we signed MacKay up for another year.

Edwadds v DMac...hmm, which is the better option for our club in the next 5 years? 🤔
 
Sounds like we only plan on taking our first four picks then matching Borlase and or Newchurch

really there’s no room for Edwards so best he put his best foot forward at other clubs
Except there would have been room if we hadn’t given Mackay 1 year. I was always OK with DMac if it didn’t affect how we drafted, but regardless of how we rate Edwards, he is a better option with the discount and the PR bonuses he brings than Mackey could possibly be.
 
We aren't locked into picking him if we nominate. He can be rookie listed for nothing or we can pass. There is no downside at all that I can see.
Why bother nominating him if we don't plan on picking him ??

Better off concentrating on players we actually want. It's probably more a loss for Luke as he's not guaranteed a spot on a list.
 
Except there would have been room if we hadn’t given Mackay 1 year. I was always OK with DMac if it didn’t affect how we drafted, but regardless of how we rate Edwards, he is a better option with the discount and the PR bonuses he brings than Mackey could possibly be.
LMFAO.

How'd that work for Jackson ???
 
Except there would have been room if we hadn’t given Mackay 1 year. I was always OK with DMac if it didn’t affect how we drafted, but regardless of how we rate Edwards, he is a better option with the discount and the PR bonuses he brings than Mackey could possibly be.
If we didn’t sign up Mackay sounds like there’s about a dozen options ahead of Edwards, all of which are behind our first 4 or 5 preferences in the draft anyway so we’re arguing over scraps here.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Why bother nominating him if we don't plan on picking him ??

Better off concentrating on players we actually want. It's probably more a loss for Luke as he's not guaranteed a spot on a list.
I'd be very surprised if he's not good enough for a rookie spot at worst. That's why you list him.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Remove this Banner Ad

2020 Trade & List Management discussion

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top