- Joined
- Jul 13, 2015
- Posts
- 2,593
- Reaction score
- 6,695
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- I don't actually support North Melb
I tend to agree on no extra trades, but I'd rather it stays best18 and just accept that I may end up playing 1 short that week than to give those who have burnt through all their allocated trades any trade relief.
I think you have to do extra trades or best 16, all keeping the status quo does is reward those who have catered towards one bye round out of sheer luck. There's no skill in one fixture being changed and that massively benefitting someone.
Best 16 > Daylight > Extra Trades though imo. Extra trades as you said gives relief to those who burnt through trades, best 16 keeps the season's scoring structure relatively normal as Richmond/WCE dont have that many high ownership players.
Dusty/Short//RCD/NicNat/Bolton are the only playing players above 5% ownership.
I'd say there would be very few people with more than 3 of those, and anyone who brings in CCJ willingly not knowing when the fixture is going to be played shouldn't be accounted for in any potential decision.
I'm not entirely sure they have the ability to change to Best 15 though, so I'd imagine extra trades are coming if the match gets moved.






