WaynesWorld19
Moderator
- Moderator
- #3,901
You trust Bevo ? .....I don't trust anything said in pressersI'm no medico on that front. The way Bevo was talking, he's not playing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You trust Bevo ? .....I don't trust anything said in pressersI'm no medico on that front. The way Bevo was talking, he's not playing.
don't get me wrong. He's rotting on my bench so I hope he plays. I just don't think he will.You trust Bevo ? .....I don't trust anything said in pressers
English won't play this week based on his concussion historyYou trust Bevo ? .....I don't trust anything said in pressers
Games played for you on the ground =don't get me wrong. He's rotting on my bench so I hope he plays. I just don't think he will.
I strongly support doing the opposite of whatever soccer does. The only place I can see for a red card is for strikes like Hall and Gaff (turning around and punching someone in the face 50m off the ball. should be assault as well)Agreed, but a red card might be a better way of dealing with future incidents on the day. Like soccer
Agree with what Nick Reiwodlt said, when something like this happens in a GF, then it will change.I strongly support doing the opposite of whatever soccer does. The only place I can see for a red card is for strikes like Hall and Gaff (turning around and punching someone in the face 50m off the ball. should be assault as well)
3 on the bench, 17 on field is stupidly unfair. You play more than maybe a quarter with 17 there's no chance you win regardless of who's out thereAgree with what Nick Reiwodlt said, when something like this happens in a GF, then it will change.
The biggest problem currently is the team who are on the receiving end of the foul play are dis-advantaged because they lose a player. In this case they can use the sub, but what happens if they have already used their sub?
Also, when the red card is suggested, would that mean 17 on the field, or 3 on the bench?
Umpires have consistently shown an inability to make accurate decisions .....add more umpires, and they constantly contradict each others decisionsFor me the biggest issue with a red card system is that it would feed into the "punish the outcome, not the action" school and that's already gotten out of hand.
But with the sniping came retribution? I assume 50 years ago Stewart or Gaff wouldn't have walked off the field. Can't really even things up like that now.we havent had a red card system for 150 yrs or whatever it is and there was a hell of alot more sniping going on for the majority of that than in this era
no way we should have anything near that
Agree with what Nick Reiwodlt said, when something like this happens in a GF, then it will change.
The biggest problem currently is the team who are on the receiving end of the foul play are dis-advantaged because they lose a player. In this case they can use the sub, but what happens if they have already used their sub?
Also, when the red card is suggested, would that mean 17 on the field, or 3 on the bench?
i get your reasoning, back then 2 umps players spread across the ground in real positions, no cameras , etc etc . yes retribution was the way it was in most cases and if the umpire did see it and report, the victim would lie at the tribunal anyways and follow the silence codeBut with the sniping came retribution? I assume 50 years ago Stewart or Gaff wouldn't have walked off the field. Can't really even things up like that now.
I'm not saying your wrong, but it probably cost Richmond the game the other day. Sure Stewart gets a ban, but that only advantages other teams.
Guilty - yes I must admit I find it odd you can knock someone out and stay on the field. And the reasoning of "well it's always been like that" is a bit unusual, but there are a lot of unusual things things I like about AFL.i get your reasoning, back then 2 umps players spread across the ground in real positions, no cameras , etc etc . yes retribution was the way it was in most cases and if the umpire did see it and report, the victim would lie at the tribunal anyways and follow the silence code
the games now so different
from memory you're a kiwi and send offs are normal in rugby , so i guess you're more broad minded than some of us old aussie farts
Ahhhhh what's another catastrophe to the other 86 currently on show.Umpires have consistently shown an inability to make accurate decisions .....add more umpires, and they constantly contradict each others decisions
Good luck with a red card / sin bin process ......if you think 50 mtr penalties, and current reports are a shemozzle ....just wait on this catastrophe
i think in a nutshell, its always been like that because the overlords have always introduced a mechanism with the times. lee matthews getting de-registered for example.Guilty - yes I must admit I find it odd you can knock someone out and stay on the field. And the reasoning of "well it's always been like that" is a bit unusual, but there are a lot of unusual things things I like about AFL.
I'm not arguing for send-offs, just trying to understand the debate.
Who exactly is going to be playing the Stewart role ? Not DeKoning, got his own role. Who do they bring in or move into the Stewart role ?
On Redmi Note 5 using BigFooty.com mobile app
Blicavs looks the natural replacement, given that he seems to share an uncanny Boys From Brazil like resemblance with Stewart, SDK, TDK at Carlton, and several other Geelong defender types: Matter of fact, I wonder what sort of biogenetic program they are running down there.Henry maybe or Blicavs?