Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Yep agree, now is the time to take these risks. Though I think it reasonable to expect Bombers to throw their F2 in the mix if we offer our F1It is time to speed this rebuild up. We cannot afford to wait another 12 months. If we come bottom 3 next year we may as well close up the place.
Trade F1 for 9 and make a splash to get Houston or at the very least get another top 10 pick this year which is by all reports a stacked draft.
Could it backfire massively? Yes.
Is it a risk ? Yes
Is it something we should be doing? Absolutely.
I think the trade is fine in a 3-way with our two besties to get Houston. I wouldn't do the * trade then try and negotiate with Port - who would likely try and get more than pick 9.It is time to speed this rebuild up. We cannot afford to wait another 12 months. If we come bottom 3 next year we may as well close up the place.
Trade F1 for 9 and make a splash to get Houston or at the very least get another top 10 pick this year which is by all reports a stacked draft.
Could it backfire massively? Yes.
Is it a risk ? Yes
Is it something we should be doing? Absolutely.
Like Gerreyn...There’s always one that is all the rage on the interwebs by the fans that gets drafted late or not at all.
I very much doubt tauru gets taken before pick 6
We are coming to them though and they have multiple suitors. If anything, we may need to throw current draft points back.* would need to sweeten the deal if they want our F1.
Pick 9 will only be part of the deal.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
We have finished bottom 2 for the last 5 years. We have made plenty of mistakes. Name one. Just one. :stern lookI'm glad you see some good points considering 99% of your posts are either negative or abusive. Well done.
Like I said I think 9 for f1 is uncomfortable enough for everyone to feel comfortable.We are coming to them though and they have multiple suitors. If anything, we may need to throw current draft points back.
Even if we get 9, port will ask for our 20s pick too.
Picking Noble for coach would be the biggest mistake i would think.We have finished bottom 2 for the last 5 years. We have made plenty of mistakes. Name one. Just one. :stern look
I’m sorry but this what rebuilds look like. Patience. :stern lookIt is time to speed this rebuild up. We cannot afford to wait another 12 months. If we come bottom 3 next year we may as well close up the place.
Trade F1 for 9 and make a splash to get Houston or at the very least get another top 10 pick this year which is by all reports a stacked draft.
Could it backfire massively? Yes.
Is it a risk ? Yes
Is it something we should be doing? Absolutely.
Yes but if ours is the most attractive offer by far then I don’t think it’s out of the questionWe are coming to them though and they have multiple suitors. If anything, we may need to throw current draft points back.
Even if we get 9, port will ask for our 20s pick too.
Congratulations. It was like trying to get blood out of a stone but we got there in the end. :stern lookPicking Noble for coach would be the biggest mistake i would think.
NoblePicking Noble for coach would be the biggest mistake i would think.
Agree with Tauru a forward, from the little I've seen.My opinion (with no intel) is that we are trying for 1 of 2 scenarios:
1 - Tauru, Houston, Trainor
2 - Tauru, Travaglia, Trainor
I really think we’re trying to fix our backline in one hit. (and I think Tauru is a forward)
Make the most of it cause you won't get another one.Congratulations. It was like trying to get blood out of a stone but we got there in the end. :stern look
So f1 and 20s ….no wayF1 swap with *
In - 9
Out - 20's pick
Corrected for reality but * wouldn't do it.F2 swap with *
In - 9
Out - 20's pick
LOL. So if the club keep on making Brain Dead decisions I gather you’ll be happy with that? :stern lookMake the most of it cause you won't get another one.
I've run this one over pointlessly in my head quite a bit.Picking Noble for coach would be the biggest mistake i would think.
Tauru purely so we can shout rooooooo when he marks it.My opinion (with no intel) is that we are trying for 1 of 2 scenarios:
1 - Tauru, Houston, Trainor
2 - Tauru, Travaglia, Trainor
I really think we’re trying to fix our backline in one hit. (and I think Tauru is a forward)
And it pairs so well with denialEntitlement is a helluva drug.
I am glad its fixed now . Onwards and upwards from here.I've run this one over pointlessly in my head quite a bit.
I defended him at the time on the ill-founded basis that there was no way a coach could take such a backwards step in his progression without an obvious cause. But then when we look at it just at a slightly deeper level based on observations from any given interview:
Fairly awkward communicator
No warmth to speak of
Slightly smarmy way about him. Not overt, but enough beneath the surface
And whoever interviewed him at the club was satisfied he was the man to lead and form meaningful relationships with a bunch of young men, over whoever else was available at the time. I just cannot grasp how we did that. Do we know how human relationships work? Are we aware of the distinction between administrative and personal roles, and that a senior coach requires a bit from column A and a whole lot from column B?
The incompetence at the club really ran quite deeply, and boy did we pay for it
Oh add the Paul Roos consultancy to my list. The ****ing charlatanI've run this one over pointlessly in my head quite a bit.
I defended him at the time on the ill-founded basis that there was no way a coach could take such a backwards step in his progression without an obvious cause. But then when we look at it just at a slightly deeper level based on observations from any given interview:
Fairly awkward communicator
No warmth to speak of
Slightly smarmy way about him. Not overt, but enough beneath the surface
And whoever interviewed him at the club was satisfied he was the man to lead and form meaningful relationships with a bunch of young men, over whoever else was available at the time. I just cannot grasp how we did that. Do we know how human relationships work? Are we aware of the distinction between administrative and personal roles, and that a senior coach requires a bit from column A and a whole lot from column B?
The incompetence at the club really ran quite deeply, and boy did we pay for it
ITK status confirmed.