List Mgmt. 2024 Trade & List Management Thread - Part 3

[giantroo]

Spoiler: 2024 Draft Picks

 

[travelli]

I’m confident our future first will end up being around pick number 7.

Realistically anywhere between 4-10.

Who are the 6 clubs we will be better than next year?

 

[DuckYeah]

Who are the 6 clubs we will be better than next year?

Wet toast
*
Melbourne
GC
Richmond
Adelaide

 

[The Nostradamus]

Wet toast
*
Melbourne
GC
Richmond
Adelaide

I’d add saints to that list

 

[HBFlanker]

Future 1st for picks 10 and 11 is in play I'm hearing.

Richmond are hesitant to give up pick 6 in this year's draft which is understandable.

 

[Passmore]

Future 1st for picks 10 and 11 is in play I'm hearing.

Richmond are hesitant to give up pick 6 in this year's draft which is understandable.

It certainly wouldn't surprise if Richmond wanted to spread the intake over 2 years.

Sent from my SM-A908B using Tapatalk

 

[DuckYeah]

I’d add saints to that list

I knew there was a team I forgot.

 

[Gorman2Geister]

We are likely to have a lot of players leave next year like CCJ and Stepho plus others like Ford and Dawson are on one year contracts and won't all be staying. So trading out picks from next year will mean we will be replacing them with fourth and fifth round picks.

 

[Chip Scab1]

I knew there was a team I forgot.

They'll finish 7-12 next year, again you'd think. I can't see us winning more games than them in '25 or '26 - which is ok, really.

 

[Orange Peanut]

Future 1st for picks 10 and 11 is in play I'm hearing.

Richmond are hesitant to give up pick 6 in this year's draft which is understandable.

Good that it gives us 2,10,11 this year. Seems pretty heavily and suspiciously in our favour actually.

I hope we can buy our way back into the first round next year though.

 

[kool kangas]

Good that it gives us 2,10,11 this year. Seems pretty heavily and suspiciously in our favour actually.

I hope we can buy our way back into the first round next year though.

With the new rule coming in cant we use our F1st in 2 years time for next year if needed or is that only for trading..

 

[DuckYeah]

They'll finish 7-12 next year, again you'd think. I can't see us winning more games than them in '25 or '26 - which is ok, really.

We’ll smoke em

 

[ToxicMegaPunts]

Future 1st for picks 10 and 11 is in play I'm hearing.

Richmond are hesitant to give up pick 6 in this year's draft which is understandable.

Trade 11 for GWS 16 & 21

2 FOS
10 Armstrong/Shanahan
16 Berry
21 Gerreyn/Mitlock

 

[The Filth Wizard]

Good that it gives us 2,10,11 this year. Seems pretty heavily and suspiciously in our favour actually.

I hope we can buy our way back into the first round next year though.

Yeah, nice for us so probably unlikely. Would be a killer though.

Would say one each of 10/11 and 18/20 more likely to be in the ballpark but then they may just decide to draft hard this year.

 

[Nutjob]

We are likely to have a lot of players leave next year like CCJ and Stepho plus others like Ford and Dawson are on one year contracts and won't all be staying. So trading out picks from next year will mean we will be replacing them with fourth and fifth round picks.

We will be able to use picks 2 years ahead to get back in. Not that I am advocating trading out future picks, especially a F1. It would need to be something significant to trade that pick.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[perplexed]

Future 1st for picks 10 and 11 is in play I'm hearing.

Richmond are hesitant to give up pick 6 in this year's draft which is understandable.

Maybe we'd get one of those picks for our F1.

 

[shintemaster]

Future 1st for picks 10 and 11 is in play I'm hearing.

Richmond are hesitant to give up pick 6 in this year's draft which is understandable.

That's an ok play but the team should have the gauntlet thrown down. If they can't finish outside the bottom 6 teams they are harming their own future with this deal.

 

[DuckYeah]

Future 1st for picks 10 and 11 is in play I'm hearing.

Richmond are hesitant to give up pick 6 in this year's draft which is understandable.

They’re giving up 6 for 2?

 

[Zondor]

We’ll smoke em

By throwing a dwarf on fire back their way? :stern look

 

[Chip Scab1]

Whilst I am not prepared to say we will, or we won't smoke 'em. We very well could as part of being twice as good, finishing well below them and they still finish 7-10. I have little confidence against Ross Lyon coached teams, but agree in that come 2027 we'll be eating these type of sides consistently!

 

[BrownPaperBag]

We’ll smoke em

If we got em

 

[Shinboner1]

imagine if we ended up with 2, 10 and 11.
****ing bonkers result.

 

[HBFlanker]

They’re giving up 6 for 2?

We wanted 6 and 10, or 6 and 11.

They want to keep 6

 

[SWMD]

imagine if we ended up with 2, 10 and 11.
****ing bonkers result.

2 - FOS - class
10 - Best available KPF
11 - hotton/lindsay/berry/travaglia

Or do you split 11 for two hits between 15 and 24 and go for another tall plus Hannaford combo.

Keep in mind, we may not hold a single pick inside 25 next year.

 

[travelli]

Wet toast
*
Melbourne
GC
Richmond
Adelaide

That's ambitious.

I'd be fairly confident we will beat Richmond & West Coast.

Not sure about the rest. We have immediate improvement with Parker, Caleb & Logue, but we just have too many other substandard guys who we will have to play, but will hold us back.

I'm still thinking 15-16th, but more competitive. The big improvement in 2026.

 

[Roosurgence]

We wanted 6 and 10, or 6 and 11.

They want to keep 6

That’s ok. I want a Porsche for nothing as well, but it ain’t going to happen.

They are acting like 6 has nearly the equivalent value of 2, which is garbage.