Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2025 AFL Draft - Draft Analysis

Which 2 Players End Up At Richmond,

  • Cumming & Robey

    Votes: 70 44.9%
  • Cumming & X.Taylor

    Votes: 44 28.2%
  • Cumming & Farrow

    Votes: 2 1.3%
  • Cumming & Grlj

    Votes: 8 5.1%
  • Robey & X.Taylor

    Votes: 23 14.7%
  • Robey & Farrow

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • Robey & Grlj

    Votes: 6 3.8%
  • X. Taylor & Farrow

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • X.Taylor&

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • Farrow & Grlj

    Votes: 1 0.6%

  • Total voters
    156
  • Poll closed .

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Keep in mind Robey will grow to 194cm, and is a very strong mark and good on the lead. He could easily become a Cam Rayner type hybrid marking forward who ends up more predominantly forward, to complement the less agile Faull and Armstrong.

That’s a fair point. If Robey reaches 194 cm with the same leading patterns and aerial presence he has shown in patches, he becomes a different level of prospect. The hybrid forward role you are outlining is something Richmond have lacked. A Rayner style power mover who can hit up at the ball, crash a contest, then still be agile enough at ground level would complement Faull and Armstrong well, who project more as straight line marking targets.

My hesitation is only about sample size. The traits are there and the growth profile makes sense, but we are projecting more than we usually do with our first selection. Dyson Sharp has the runs on the board across multiple environments and looks ready sooner, but if Hartley sees genuine long term upside in Robey’s athletic development profile, then it fits the direction the list is heading. I can see the logic behind taking a swing on that type of player even if the exposed form is lighter.

Both arguments have merit. It just comes down to how confident Richmond are in the projection data and the character profile behind the scenes.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Keep in mind Robey will grow to 194cm, and is a very strong mark and good on the lead. He could easily become a Cam Rayner type hybrid marking forward who ends up more predominantly forward, to complement the less agile Faull and Armstrong.
Robey only just turned 18 (October birthdate) ,
And late to the elite junior development system.
Who knows how much growth he has left in him ( vertically and football development)
 
Robey only just turned 18 (October birthdate) ,
And late to the elite junior development system.
Who knows how much growth he has left in him ( vertically and football development)
worried he’s a right footed Cumbo Groupie_
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Just asked chat GTP, looks like the early Kellaway bid is still definitely in play

Watch this space

Based on the above, here are a few players linked (by analysts) to Richmond, and why they make sense:

  1. Sullivan Robey
    • Who is he? A 192 cm forward/mid from Eastern Ranges. ﹣ Reading the Play links him to Richmond in their phantom draft. Reading the Play
    • Why Richmond might pick him: He offers size, contested power, and versatility (can play forward andthrough the midfield), which suits Richmond’s desire for a “powerful forward-midfield hybrid” who can both win in stoppages and split lines. Reading the Play
    • Upside: High athletic upside + size makes him a potential “X-factor” type — not just a pure forward.
  2. Sam Grlj
    • Who is he? A quick, outside-running midfielder from the Oakleigh Chargers. Zero Hanger
    • Why Richmond might pick him: He brings the “outside run” Richmond lacks. According to recruitment analysis, Grlj’s speed and burst could add dimension to their midfield, offering a more modern link-man or wing/half-back runner. Zero Hanger
    • Considerations: He’s maybe more of a long-term project; some argue his kicking or decision-making could be a question mark, but his athletic profile is attractive. ﹣ (Note: some fan debate about this) Reddit
  3. Louis Kellaway
    • Who is he? Son of Duncan Kellaway; plays for Sturt (SA) and has shown versatility across half-back, midfield, and forward lines in his junior level. Zero Hanger+1
    • Why Richmond might pick him: He’s linked strongly to Richmond (father-son potential), and his composure, ball use, and decision-making could provide them with a multi-line option — someone who can defend, deliver the ball, or even rotate forward. Zero Hanger
    • Fit: Because he’s not purely a contested mid or key tall, he gives Richmond flexibility — which is valuable when you're building or rebalancing a list
      Putting it all together:
      • With two very early picks, Richmond is unlikely to “reach” too far down the board — they’ll probably use both on high-upside top-10 (or near top-5) talent.
      • I think their two picks will likely split roles:
        • One will go to a high-upside contested / size player (like Sullivan Robey) — someone who can be a monster in stoppages or forward.
        • The other will go to a running, line-breaking type (like Sam Grlj) or a utility/multi-line player like Louis Kellaway, giving them future flexibility
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

F: Alger Armstrong Lalor
HF: Robey Faull Kickett
C: Retschko Smillie Campbell
HB: Trainor Gibcus Banks
B: Brown Balta Gray
Foll: Sims Cumming Hotton
Int: Smith Kellaway McAuliffe MRJ
IMG_1415.gif
 
I like the look of Sullivan Robey, and I can absolutely see why Cal has connected us to him, but I’m a little cautious because the body of work isn’t as deep as what someone like Dyson Sharp has produced. Robey’s ceiling is high and the traits are obvious, but the floor is lower and that always carries some risk, especially at our current stage of the list cycle.





Richmond traditionally keep things very tight around draft time, so I do wonder whether this is genuine interest or just the usual smoke and mirrors. That said, I trust Blair Hartley’s eye for character and projection. If the club sees the tools translating, you back their judgement, because the talent ID history is strong.





Part of me wonders if this is the continuation of the Chris Toce legacy of backing upside and development over the safer, more exposed junior. I’m not against the Robey pick at all, but there’s a valid argument that someone more proven could help stabilise the list sooner.





Happy to be proven wrong, but those are the dynamics I’m weighing up.
We are in the business of winning flags not scraping into the 8. Lalor, Hotton, Robey and Cumming has the potential to be one of the most damaging midfields in the game.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2025 AFL Draft - Draft Analysis

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top