Mowman
Brownlow Medallist
- May 19, 2013
- 23,920
- 88,194
This thread is pin the tail on the donkey sort of stuff.
12 months ago the argument around list management with Battle was we could afford our 3rd KPD and running interceptor to leave so we could fix the midfield issue once and for all.
We drafted a running half back and KPD, now the argument is it’s no longer a midfield issue, it’s a intercepting defender issue, so we should give up capital for Aleek and Bergman. This is despite all key data telling us otherwise.
You couldn’t make this stuff up. What’s next, we offload Nas for Butters and Bergman, and our issues become a half back flank issue in 2 years when Sincs is 32? Mind boggling stuff.
don’t know how many times I read that we were fine losing Battle because we were guaranteed an elite midWe didn’t get the mid and we didn’t have someone to replace Battle






