akaifu
Norm Smith Medallist
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2023
- Posts
- 5,290
- Reaction score
- 23,745
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
Hasn't it been reported by multiple sources that Worpel is more likely to stay?Only thing is worpel leaves so they will wanna keep mckenzie
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 9
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Hasn't it been reported by multiple sources that Worpel is more likely to stay?Only thing is worpel leaves so they will wanna keep mckenzie
Gone
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
You think they’re not?The club should be doing its hardest to convince any player, not just Nas that this is the place to be. Regardless of home state.
Can you imagine the crap rewound be getting from our supporters on here, especially if we didn't land Pou.But without the high production. He looks like a very vanilla player to me. I know he's young and all that but I'm not seeing it yet.
100%If you have a player who has a pull to go home you don’t sit there and hold a gun to his head because the first chance he gets, he’s going to run. If nas is considering playing in SA, he’s going to talk to them with or without our encouragement.
We’ve treated Nas like an adult, the actions of Ross, the coaches and the club each and every day are the selling point as to why he and our other out of contract players will stay.
The club are confident in their actions, and that they’ve left no stone unturned. Back it in, and IF he or another leaves, understand it’s because that’s what they want.
Because we might just convince the guy that the following 6 years after 2027 are worth sticking around for.May as well be now then if that's the case. Why prolong it? We aint winning a flag in the next 2 years.
Yes. Those we didn’t mind leaving.And that is fine. What i would be concerned with is a club encouraging a player to talk to other clubs.
Weren't we in a similar situation last year? Didn't we encourage some to look at other avenues.
It is being reported that he is disgruntled by the lack of midfield time at Hawthorn.Why are we talking about Cam Mackenzie?
Is the only link that he should’ve been our NGA player if not for the afl shafting us, or is there something material to him being discussed?
Was he the guy who got Crouch?SOS seems like the old fashioned hard man type negotiator who doesn't move much.
Largely due to the media - it IS the biggest story going around at the moment.Like clock-work; the weekly 48 hour 'Sky if falling' window has opened.
It's all over the shop, the article refers to as in different places as the "St Kilda has been named as the most difficult club to deal with by player managers surveyed", "Saints the hardest club to do business with" and "St Kilda worst team to deal with".
Which begs the question - what was the actual question? Being the hardest to deal with is not necessarily the most difficult, nor the worst. In fact being hard to deal with could be a good thing depending on what exactly makes us "hard", a difficulty listed in negotiations some clubs are guilty of is “attempts for clubs to deal directly with a player”.
Anyone who wants to report on such data or take it at face value needs to watch this:
You’re caught up with him signing this contract. The reality is that it seems it’s going to be a 2 year deal.
I will say my opinion is also that…
Had Bergman not re-signed
Had port retained their FRP this year (currently 8) + Joe Berry.
I reckon the landscape would be pretty different and we could be seeing a deal done this year.
Kicking the can 2 years down the road represents our current best path forward. A lot can change in a few months let alone 2 years. You want to show that his best interests are also our best interests.
The club don’t want Nasiah for 2 more years. They want him for an entire career. You let him do what he needs now, you get your 2 years and you just have given yourself some breathing room to attempt to make it impossible for him to walk away in a few years time - when he could be very settled off the field and we could be flying on it.
You encourage him to do what he needs now to feel comfortable enough to say this is where I want to be and the fact Port aren’t in an asset position to make this a straight forward deal today helps us and wouldn’t be lost on his management.
Hasn't it been reported by multiple sources that Worpel is more likely to stay?
Like clock-work; the weekly 48 hour 'Sky if falling' window has opened.
Nah - the bloke who got Crouch was moved on by the Saints and is now on the board at Adelaide FC.Was he the guy who got Crouch?
I can’t remember, but whoever it was didn’t budge and inch. And we got our man.
God forbid people talk about trade scenarios in the list management thread.Think its more speculation on the worst case scenario than stating the worst case scenario is happening.
We see your 2 million and raise you.
This really does sum it up for me. If Nas goes I can't see myself being particularly invested next year.And like every week we have nothing to hold on to. Shit performance, players wanting out, no signings and a bleak long rebuild staring us in the faces. Even all our promising kids are no guarantee to make it and usually take 5 years to peak. It's getting ****ing tiring waiting for something to happen.
We have gone backwards every year of Lyon's tenure and likely to again the way it's all panning out. If we don't challenge while we still have Sinclair, Wilkie etc then we are back further again unless all of the kids end up coming on at an above average level.
Was he the guy who got Crouch?
I can’t remember, but whoever it was didn’t budge and inch. And we got our man.