- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #5,203
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
95…Were we better in 2023 or 2025?

These are never popular:
Carlton: Walter, Pick 6, Pick 14 and Flanders
Suns: Curnow, TDK Pick, JSOS Pick
Cripps was our best ball user at one point late this year statistically.When is your standup routine getting to Bunbury? Cripps butchers the ball as badly as the rest of the team a lot of the time. Ollie had time and space in the centre of the ground and Cripps kicked it long and high into the forward line and turned it over.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Cripps was our best ball user at one point late this year statistically.
Doesn’t say a lot, but he certainly uses it better than Hollands.
Agree with Ollie holding onto the ball a tad too long at times, if his teammates could manage to put on more of the required blocks for each other, then Ollie along with the entire team would benefit immensely…Cripps has had kicking issues in the past but when he gets it in space he generally hits his target these days. I like how he lowers his eyes kicking into the forward line. Most of our players take the coward option of just bombing it high and long.
His stats will always show low DE% because most of his possessions are inside a pack / with his tagger hanging off him.
Hollands is still young enough. He could easily come good - but right now he's getting done for holding the ball because he's not strong enough physically, missing tackles for the same reason and not getting enough of the ball (19 avg). On top of that he's giving up 2 - 6 clangers most weeks and they really are bad ones where he's under no pressure with plenty of options. It just saps the team's momentum.
It doesn't. Gold Coast will never give up Pick 6 unless they get more points on return. They need the points for their academy players.How do Gold Coast match their bids if they’re losing over 1000 points on this trade?
They won’t trade him but he would be the dreamThink Jed Walter is carrying to much weight but still reckon he will be a gun, I feel the player that I would almost do a straight swap with Charlie would be Bailey Humphrey. He is the sort of player that we have never had at Carlton, a De Goey , Dustin Martin type that explosive beast that can turn a game in a quarty
but he's a bearThink Jed Walter is carrying to much weight but still reckon he will be a gun, I feel the player that I would almost do a straight swap with Charlie would be Bailey Humphrey. He is the sort of player that we have never had at Carlton, a De Goey , Dustin Martin type that explosive beast that can turn a game in a quarty
he doesn't talk 
Buku ... all sizzle no steak ... not unlike CJ
What Carlton doesn't need is soft outside Players who lack toughness and scream 'kick it to me'
We need tough ball getters ... not list cloggers. Ok Players are just OK ... not good enough unless folks are happy with Carlton being OK. I'm expecting better than mediocrity. I'll be disappointed if Carlton recruits receivers and not feisty ball getters.
Don't waste the money ... aim higher or save for someone better.
No bargain bin types ... steak .. not sizzle
1000 points for Curnow ain't badHow do Gold Coast match their bids if they’re losing over 1000 points on this trade?
1000 points for Curnow ain't bad
Couldn't disagree more.
Carlton at the moment is all steak, no sizzle. That's one of our major issues. We've got a bunch of ball getters who then specialise in giving the ball back.
Football isn't really like any other "normal" industry.
If Curnow's contract was indeed front loaded, we could pay him his yearly salary and play him in the VFL 2nds.
This would benefit us by not having to play against him and his new team, which would potentially mean the proposed destination club doesn't win as many games.
And besides, there are millions of unhappy employees in Australia.
How the heck can anyone disagree with this? Lol...Hard to have talent coming in this year when the trade period isn't open for another 4 weeks
No one gets stashed anywhere.We'd be better off (if he does want to leave), to get his wage off the books & acquire some assets that'll actually help carry us forward.
Stashing him in the 2s essentially wastes both his time and ours, ensuring we carry dead money in the cap which would certainly hamstring us.
I can't imagine the PA or agents would be overly impressed, either.
Read the post that I responded to.No one gets stashed anywhere.
Charlie is like any other player on the list. They play within the rules, structure and game plan setup.
If they don’t, they go back to the VFL, until they learn to adhere.
Problem is, it seems we never made all the players follow the same rules.
Also, the PA and agents wouldn’t have a leg to stand on, except keep looking for trades for said player.
Doing that would be more about sending a message to player managers and other teams, that we won't be bullied.We'd be better off (if he does want to leave), to get his wage off the books & acquire some assets that'll actually help carry us forward.
Stashing him in the 2s essentially wastes both his time and ours, ensuring we carry dead money in the cap which would certainly hamstring us.
I can't imagine the PA or agents would be overly impressed, either.
Doing that would be more about sending a message to player managers and other teams, that we won't be bullied.
You take a loss on this while making sure that no one else tries any other shenanigans in future.