List Mgmt. 2025 List Management

[serial_thrilla]

 

[BettercallSaul]

Joe Brierty must have signed off on it too.

 

[Lach72]

So we currently have 19 and 46.

They must be banking on Rodriguez and Whan dropping that far or some shit

 

[Andy Brennan]

For the people ranting about West Coast - have you seen the updated trade from Twomey? They gave 16, 22 and 23 for 12 and Starcevich. Their fans are melting and for good reason

The current updated version is bad for us cos we've thrown 33 in, but I'm waiting to see confirmation as to what's actually been agreed

I wouldn't give up pick 13 for Starcevich

 

[The Feeder Club]

There's still a chance the AFL will come in to save us from ourselves - they won't tick the trade off until tomorrow I see.

It's like when your bank's security systems detect that you just transferred your life savings to a scammer, and they close your account before it happens

 

[BettercallSaul]

So we currently have 19 and 46.

They must be banking on Rodriguez and Whan dropping that far or some shit

I think Whan certainly will, who knows where Fred will go or even if we are interested.

 

[Snuffaluphagus]

Im trying to find ways for people to understand what they have supposedly done and why its important that trade is missing something.

The club appears to have given away 33 to WC for free. Like, people need to grasp that trade should not be waived away.

 

[Randomizor]

This isn’t rocket science. We probably rate McVee highly, and post season rightly identified the type of player he is as a need, to, you know, try to win a flag or something.

We may also not rate/need the players who will be around at pick 12.

Nobody here has enough information to make informed decisions on this, honestly embarrassing reactions.

The reality is Walls and co have done a fantastic job of building a great list, through both drafts and trades - have some faith.

May as well close the forum if we can’t criticize the club for doing a poor job. The constant glazing is embarrassing.

(I don’t really care too much either way, but it’s objectively a pretty poor trade for us)

 

[Ge3ks]

So we currently have 19 and 46.

Will be interesting to see where we stand by next Wednesday.

 

[lukedean16]

Im trying to find ways for people to understand what they have supposedly done and why its important that trade is missing something.

The club appears to have given away 33 to WC for free. Tell me any of you are OK with that.

Mate I’m not, im not mad at us giving 23 for Mcvee at all. I’m ****ing mad that we give up 12 and 33 for 19 an 23 like wtf is that

 

[Tonga Bob]

Im trying to find ways for people to understand what they have supposedly done and why its important that trade is missing something.

The club appears to have given away 33 to WC for free. Tell me any of you are OK with that.

Pick 33 contains potassium benzoate

 

[pK75]

There's still a chance the AFL will come in to save us from ourselves - they won't tick the trade off until tomorrow I see.

It's like when your bank's security systems detect that you just transferred your life savings to a scammer, and they close your account before it happens

As if the AFL would step in to save us from ourselves

 

[Taylor]

I think Freo will end up with a future pick in that. Otherwise we aren't well balanced at all in the trade.

 

[CaseySibosadoHOF]

This isn’t rocket science. We probably rate McVee highly, and post season rightly identified the type of player he is as a need, to, you know, try to win a flag or something.

We may also not rate/need the players who will be around at pick 12.

Nobody here has enough information to make informed decisions on this, honestly embarrassing reactions.

The reality is Walls and co have done a fantastic job of building a great list, through both drafts and trades - have some faith.

The majority of people aren't upset at paying 23 for McVee (it's not great but it is what it is).

It's more that this trade makes us as the 3rd club seem like we've been done a favour in getting that pick 23. Moving down AND losing points in the same trade as the 3rd club (which usually gets a "bonus" for unlocking the trade) is fairly gross.

 

[guidodp15]

Of course the nerds on reddit have their heads up their asses and have no problem with both trades. They’re throwing walls a party with fairy bread when he gets back

 

[s_wd6]

I think Freo will end up with a future pick in that. Otherwise we aren't well balanced at all in the trade.

F3 (from Brisbane)

 

[2big2strom]

As if the AFL would step in to save us from ourselves

AFL would hand us a sharpened sword for seppuku

 

[freo84]

I feel like the melts are a touch premature at this stage. Let's see who goes where, and how they perform before we start saying that the club is doing a poor job.

 

[Ge3ks]

23 for McVee
How does that compare to the Jordan Clark

6

Jordan Clark

Age

25

Ht

185cm

Wt

83kg

Pos.

Def

Career

Season

Last 5

D

13.7

4star

K

9.4

4star

HB

4.3

3star

M

4.2

4star

T

2.6

4star

MG

172.0

3star

D

12.5

3star

K

8.5

3star

HB

4.0

3star

M

4.0

4star

T

1.5

2star

MG

172.0

3star

D

12.2

3star

K

10.4

4star

HB

1.8

2star

M

3.4

4star

T

2.4

4star

trade? (that we clearly won) And factoring in that this is a supposedly weak draft.

 

[Purple Jesus]

Butters to Doggies getting louder and louder.

That would be the world’s dumbest trade for them. Defenders doggies, you need defenders.

 

[Taylor]

F3 (from Brisbane)

WC's F2 balances it out and gives us the picks to match a late first bid for Robinson

 

[Randomizor]

Of course the nerds on reddit have their heads up their asses and have no problem with both trades. They’re throwing walls a party with fairy bread when he gets back

It is pretty unfair that he’s on a standard contract instead of JLs infinitely long one. It does need rectifying.

 

[Tonga Bob]

I feel like the melts are a touch premature at this stage. Let's see who goes where, and how they perform before we start saying that the club is doing a poor job.

You new here?

 

[Randomizor]

That would be the world’s dumbest trade for them. Defenders doggies, you need defenders.

Never interrupt your enemy while he is making a mistake

 

[Jezzitizle]

The majority of people aren't upset at paying 23 for McVee (it's not great but it is what it is).

It's more that this trade makes us as the 3rd club seem like we've been done a favour in getting that pick 23. Moving down AND losing points in the same trade as the 3rd club (which usually gets a "bonus" for unlocking the trade) is fairly gross.

It’s still nonsense - points are irrelevant, they don’t consider needs or how we we rate the draft, nor whatever else we have planned.

And it isn’t a bonus to unlock a trade - there was something we valued we got out of it, we weren’t doing anyone a favour.

 

[Superkoops]

I’d still like a token later pick as well

50>46 involved